Journal of Parasitic Diseases

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 633–642 | Cite as

Real scale environmental monitoring of zoonotic protozoa and helminth eggs in biosolid samples in Brazil

  • Taís Rondello BonattiEmail author
  • Regina Maura Bueno Franco
Original Article


Biosolid is the product of the activated sludge treatment system and its final disposition is subject of ongoing discussion as this residue can therefore harbor a great number and variety of pathogens. This study was aimed to (1) monitor the presence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in biosolid samples from a treatment plant in Campinas, SP, Brazil, (2) observe Giardia cyst wall morphological integrity in treated samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and (3) verify the presence and viability of helminth eggs. Cysts were present in 33.3 % of the samples, whereas oocysts were detected in 8.3 %. Viable Ascaris sp. Toxocara sp. and similar to Trichuris sp. eggs were found through the use of Mexican Official Norm. Results demonstrate the difficulties inherent in working with biosolid as factors such as temperature, ionic strength and pH influenced the recovery of cysts and oocysts. Pores and ruptures were not observed in cyst wall visualized by SEM following 45 days of exposure to sunlight, only minimal morphological changes. These observations emphasize both the importance of adequate treatment of sewage sludge and the need to develop appropriate techniques for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in this type of sample. This is the first time that a study was done in a real scale for biosolid samples in determining the presence of pathogenic protozoa as Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Brazil, and also observed minimal cyst wall damage after sunlight treatment.


Giardia Cryptosporidium Helminth eggs Biosolid Monitoring 



We would like to thank Sanasa (Sanitation and Water Supplying Society, Campinas) and Opersan Company at Jundiaí that allowed the sampling and provided the samples. Also, we would like to thanks CAPES (Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for the project funding.


  1. Abreu-Acosta N, Vera L (2011) Occurrence and removal of parasites, enteric bacteria and faecal contamination indicators in wastewater natural reclamation systems in Tenerife-Canary Islands, Spain. Ecol Eng 37:496–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman SA, Randers L, Rao G (1993) Comparison of Trypan Blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations. Biotechnol Prog 9:671–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anceno A, Katayama H, Houpt E, Chavalitshewinkoon-Petmitr P, Chuluun B, Shipin OV (2007) IMS-free DNA extraction for the PCR-based quantification of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in surface and waste water. Int J Environ Heal R 17:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonadonna L, Briancesco R, Ottaviani O, Veschetti E (2002) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in sewage effluents and correlation with microbial, chemical and physical water variables. Environ Monit Assess 75:241–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonatti TR, Franco RMB, Cantusio NR (2007) Comparison of two methodologies for detection of Giardia spp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in activated sludge samples from a sewage treatment plant in the city of Campinas, São Paulo State Brazil. J Water Health 5:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branco N, Leal DAG, Franco RMB (2012) A parasitological survey of natural water springs and inhabitants of a tourist city in Southeastern Brazil. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 12:410–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantusio Neto R, Santos LU, Sato MIZ, Franco RMB (2010) Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in surface water supply of Campinas Southeast Brazil. Water Sci Technol 62:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capizzi-Banas S, Deloge M, Remy M, Schwartzbrod J (2004) Liming as an advanced treatment for sludge sanitisation: helminth eggs elimination—Ascaris eggs as model. Water Res 38:3251–3258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. CETESB—Company of Technology of Environmental Sanitation (1999) Application of sewage sludge from biological handling systems in agricultural areas: criteria for project and operation: Technical Manual, Norm P 4230, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  10. CONAMA National Environmental Council (2011) Resolution no. 430. Brasília, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook N, Paton CA, Wilkinson N, Nichols RAB, Baker K, Smith HV (2006) Towards standard methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts on lettuce and raspberries. Part 1: development and opmitization of methods. Int J Food Microbiol 109:222–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Daí X, Boll J, Hayes ME, Aston DE (2004) Adhesion of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia to solid surfaces: the role of surface charge and hydrophobicity. Colloid Surf B 34:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drozd C, Schwartzbrod J (1996) Hydrophobic and electrostatic cell surface properties of Cryptosporidium parvum. Appl Environ Microb 62:1227–1232Google Scholar
  14. Franco RMB (1996) Giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis in daycares at Campinas, SP. Rev Soc Bras Med Tro 29:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guadagnini R, Santos L, Franco R, Guimarães J (2013) Inactivation of bacteria and helminth in wastewater treatment plant effluent using oxidation processes. Water Sci Technol 68(8):1825–1829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guzmán C, Jofre J, Montemayor M, Lucena F (2007) Occurrence and levels of indicators and selected pathogens in different sludges and biosolids. J Appl Microbiol 103:2420–2429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hachich EM, Galvani AT, Padula JA, Stoppe NC, Garcia SC, Bonanno VMS, Barbosa MRF, Sato MIZ (2013) Pathogenic parasites and enteroviruses in wastewater: support for a regulation on water reuse. Water Sci Technol 67:1512–1518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammes F, Berney M, Egli T (2011) Cultivation-independent assessment of bacterial viability. Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol 124:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller L (2007) Basic Sanitation in Brazil: lessons from the past, opportunities from the present, challenges for the Future. J Comp Soc Welf 2:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu CJ, Gibbs RA, Mort NR, Hofstede HT, Ho GE, Unkovich I (1996) Giardia and its implications for sludge disposal. Water Sci Technol 34:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins MB, Bowman DD, Ghiorse WC (1998) Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by ammonia. Appl Environ Microb 64:784–788Google Scholar
  22. Jensen PKM, Phuc PD, Konradsen F, Klank LT, Dalsgaard A (2009) Survival of Ascaris eggs and hygienic quality of human excreta in Vietnamese composting latrines. Environ Health 8:57–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiménez B, Maya C, Sánchez E, Romero A, Lira L, Barrios JA (2002) Comparison of the quantity and quality of the microbiological content of sludge in countries with low and high content of pathogens. Water Sci Technol 46:17–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson DC, Enriquez CE, Pepper IL, Davis TL, Gerba PC, Rose JB (1997) Survival of Giardia, Cryptosporidium, poliovirus and Salmonella in marine waters. Water Sci Technol 35:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King BJ, Monis PT (2007) Critical processes affecting Cryptosporidium oocysts survival in environment. Parasitology 134:309–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lapen DR, Topp E, Edwards M, Sabourin L, Curnoe W, Gottschall N, Bolton P, Raman S, Ball-Coelho B, Payne M, Kleywegt S, McLaughLin N (2008) Effect of liquid municipal biosolid application method on tile and ground water quality. J Environ Qual 37:925–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemarchand K, Lebaron P (2003) Occurrence of Salmonella spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in a French coastal watershed: relationship with fecal indicators. FEMS Microbiol Lett 218:203–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lima MRP, Zandonade E, Sobrinho PA (2012) Characteristics of WWTP sludge after drying in greenhouse for agricultural purposes. Water Sci Technol 66:1460–1466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindahl V, Bakken LR (1995) Evaluation of methods for extraction of bacteria from soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Q, He ZL, Stoffela P (2012) Land application of biosolids in the USA: a review applied and environmental soil science. Appl Environ Sci. doi: 10.1155/2012/201462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Navarro I, Jiménez B, Cifuentes E, Lucario S (2009) Application of helminth ova infection dose curve to estimate the risks associated with biosolid application on soil. J Water Health 7:31–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Norma Oficial Mexicana México. (NOM-001-ECOL) (1996) Anexo I: Técnica para la determinación y cuantificación de huevos de helminto. Accessed Nov 2013
  33. O’Connor GA, Elliott HA, Basta NT, Bastiand RK, Pierzynskig GM, Simse RC, Smith JE (2005) Sustainable land application. J Environ Qual 34:7–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinheiro IO, Castro MF, Mitterofhe A, Pires FAC, Abramo C, Ribeiro LC, Tibiriçá SHC, Coimbra ES (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for giardiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in three municipalities of Southeastern Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Parasitol Res 108:1123–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Redlinger T, Corela-Barud V, Graham J, Galindo A, Avitia R, Cardenas V (2002) Hyperendemic Cryptosporidium and Giardia in households lacking municipal sewer and water on the United States—México border. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66:794–798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rimhanen-Finne R, Vuorinen A, Marmo S, Malmberg GS, Hänninen ML (2004) Comparative analysis of Cryptosporidium, Giardia and indicator bacteria during sewage sludge hygienization in various composting process. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:301–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Robertson LJ, Hermansen L, Gjerde BK (2006) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in Norway. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5297–5303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. SANASA—Sanitation and Water Supplying Society (2011) Accessed Nov 2013
  39. Santamaria J, Toranzos G (2003) Enteric pathogens and soil: a short review. Int Microbiol 6:5–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Searcy KE, Packman AI, Atwill ER, Harter T (2005) Association of Cryptosporidium parvum with suspended particles: impact on oocyst sedimentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1072–1078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Shamma M, Al-Adawi MA (2002) The morphological changes of Ascaris lumbricoides ova in sewage sludge water treated by gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 65:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sidhu JPS, Toze SG (2009) Human pathogens and their indicators in biosolids: a literature review. Environ Int 35:187–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Silva PRP, Barbisan LF, Dagli MLZ, Saldiva PHN (2012) Sewage sludge does not induce genotoxicity and carcinogenesis. Genet Mol Biol 35:657–663CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith AL, Smith HV (1989) A comparison of fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide staining and in vitro excystation for determining Giardia intestinalis cyst viability. Parasitology 99:329–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thiriat L, Bigot V, Schwartzbrod J (1997) Evaluation of a procedure for detection of viable Giardia cysts in wastewater sludge. Water Sci Technol 35:377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Udeh PJ, John G, Veenstra JN (2003) Field inactivation of oocysts exposed to agricultural land. Water Air Soil Poll 142:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999) Environmental regulations and technology: control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge. Revised in October 2011. Washington, DC. Report no. EPA/625/R-92/013Google Scholar
  48. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2005) Office of Water. Method 1623: Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water by filtration/IMS/FA. EPA 815-R-05-002. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC, EEUUGoogle Scholar
  49. Victorica J, Galvan M (2003) Preliminary testing of a rapid coupled methodology for quantification/viability determination of helminth eggs in raw and treated wastewater. Water Res 37:1278–1287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. WHO—World Health Organization (2006) The International Decade for Action Water for Life—2005–2015.,pdf. Accessed Oct 2013
  51. Widmer G, Clancy T, Honorine DW, Miller D, Batzer GM, Pearson CB, Bukhari Z (2002) Structural and biochemical alterations in Giardia lamblia cysts exposed to ozone. J Parasitol 88:1100–1106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taís Rondello Bonatti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Regina Maura Bueno Franco
    • 1
  1. 1.Animal Biology Department, Biology InstituteState University of CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations