Journal of Parasitic Diseases

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 129–134

Investigation of parasitic and bacterial diseases in pigs with analysis of hematological and serum biochemical profile

  • K. Kalai
  • R. S. Nehete
  • S. Ganguly
  • M. Ganguli
  • S. Dhanalakshmi
  • S. K. Mukhopadhayay
Short Communication

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to evaluate various disease conditions prevalent in slaughtered pigs and zoonotic importance. The study was conducted on two hundred non-descript pigs slaughtered at an organized slaughter house, Mumbai. The animals included in the study were randomly selected. Post mortem examination of the animals was performed to note various disease conditions and tissues were collected for histopathology. Direct examination of stool was found negative for parasites. Gross and microscopical examination revealed presence of Ascarops strongylina, Sarcocyst, Hydatid cyst, Cysticercus cellulosae, Ascaris suum and Cysticercus tenuicollis, along with bacteria like Salmonella, Pseudomonas, Shigella, Streptococci, Proteus and Pasteurella spp. were isolated. Indirect ELISA was performed for detection of antibody titer in the pig serum against classical swine fever. Studies on hematological and serum biochemical profile revealed decreased total protein concentration and globulin level with leukocytosis and neutrophilia and in parasitic infections eosinophilia was evident.

Keywords

Bacteria Classical swine fever Hematological Parasites Pigs Post mortem examination Serum biochemical profile 

References

  1. Benjamin MM (2005) Outline of veterinary clinical pathology, 3rd edn. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, New Delhi, pp 180–212Google Scholar
  2. Bruce HJ (1995) Diagnosis of viral respiratory disease. Swine Health Product 3:116–120Google Scholar
  3. Chauhan RS, Agarwal DK (2006) Textbook of veterinary clinical & laboratory diagnosis, 2nd edn. JP Publishers, New Delhi, pp 184–188Google Scholar
  4. Coles EH (1980) Textbook of veterinary clinical pathology, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, pp 188–246Google Scholar
  5. Cowan ST, Steel KT (1993) Manual for identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Bentley House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP, Swain RHA (1975) Medical microbiology, 12th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Souza PE, Hafeez M (1998) Incidence of Cysticercus cellulosae infection in pigs in Andhra Pradesh. Mysore J Agric Sci 32(1):75–78Google Scholar
  8. Doumas BT, Arend RL, Pinto PC (1972) Estimation of serum albumin, In: Standard methods of clinical chemistry, vol 7. Academic Press, Chicago, pp 175–189Google Scholar
  9. Gatne ML (2001) Studies on the antigenic profiles of hydatidosis in farm animals with particular emphasis on specific immunodiagnostics. Ph.D. Thesis. Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, MaharashtraGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe MZ (1986) Estimation of serum creatinine. Physiol Chem 10:91–400Google Scholar
  11. Nandi S (2002) Classical swine fever virus—its survival & inactivation. The Blue Cross Book 17:8–10Google Scholar
  12. Odink JJFM, Smeets IJR, Visser H, Snijders JMAS (1990) Hematological and clinicochemical profiles of healthy swine and swine with inflammatory processes. J Anim Sci 68(1):163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearlman PC, Lee RT (1974) Estimation of total and direct bilirubin. Clin Chem 20:447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pednekar RP, Gaurat RP, Gatne ML (2009) Prevalence, fertility rate and protein content of hydatid cysts in food animals slaughtered at Deonar Abattoir. J Bombay Vet Coll 17(1):49–51Google Scholar
  15. Rajan A (2007) Histopathology as a tool in the diagnosis of animal disease. In: ICAR summer school in diagnostic pathology with special reference to diagnosis of animal neoplasm. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India, pp 28–30Google Scholar
  16. Rajbonshi G (2007) Isolation and characterization of classical swine fever virus. M.V.Sc. Thesis. College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Khanapara, GawahatiGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarma PC, Sarma DK (1996) Use of indirect ELISA for detecting HCV antibodies in vaccinated piglet. Indian J Anim Sci 66(11):1128–1129Google Scholar
  18. Shastri UV (1966) Helminth parasites domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica) in Bombay (Maharashtra State). M.V.Sc. Thesis. University of Bombay, BombayGoogle Scholar
  19. Snedecor GW, Cochron WG (1994) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  20. Soulsby EJL (1982) Helminths, arthropods and protozoan of domesticated animals, 7th edn. In: The English language book society. Bailliere Tindall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Tietz NW (1976) Estimation of blood urea nitrogen. In: Fundamentals of clinical chemistry. W.B. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Tietz NW (1983) Textbook of clinical chemistry. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  23. Tietz NW (1986) Textbook of clinical chemistry. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  24. Tietz NW (1995) Estimation of serum alanine amino transferase. In: Clinical guide to laboratory tests, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 76Google Scholar
  25. Varma TK (1990) Prevalence of Echinococcus granulosus infection in domestic animals of district Gurgaon (Haryana), India. Philippines J Vet Med 27(2):65–69Google Scholar
  26. Varma S, Mallik PD, Lal SS, Varma SS (1977) Survey of gastrointestinal nematodes of the domestic pigs at Hissar. HAU J Res 7(4):221–225Google Scholar
  27. Vijayasmitha R, Jagannath MS, Rahman SA, Honnappa TG (1993) The utility of leucocyte migration inhibition test in the diagnosis of hydatidosis in food animals. Indian J Anim Sci 63:596–599Google Scholar
  28. Yadav AK, Tendon V (1989) Nematode parasite infection of domestic pigs in a subtropical and high rainfall area of India. Vet Parasitol 31(2):133–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kalai
    • 1
  • R. S. Nehete
    • 1
  • S. Ganguly
    • 2
  • M. Ganguli
    • 3
  • S. Dhanalakshmi
    • 3
  • S. K. Mukhopadhayay
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary PathologyBombay Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences UniversityMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.All India Coordinated Research Project on Post Harvest Technology (ICAR) [Kolkata Centre], Department of Fish Processing Technology, Faculty of Fishery SciencesWest Bengal University of Animal and Fishery SciencesKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal SciencesWest Bengal University of Animal and Fishery SciencesKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations