Advertisement

Silicon

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Dry Sliding Friction and Wear Behaviour of AA6082-TiB2 in Situ Composites

  • Harpal Singh
  • Mir Irfan Ul HaqEmail author
  • Ankush Raina
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In this study a composite with AA6082 as the matrix and TiB2 as the reinforcement has been fabricated by in situ method. The effect of TiB2 addition on the mechanical and tribological behaviour has been investigated. The purpose of the study is to improve the friction and wear properties of AA6082 so as to widen the engineering applications of the alloy. The reinforcement varied as (0, 3, 6, 9 wt%). The mechanical characteristics such as hardness and density improved with the addition of the reinforcement particles. The microhardness also shows slight increase in its value with increase in reaction time. The microstructural examination depicted grain refinement of the cast composites with increase in reinforcement. The wear resistance also increases with the addition of the reinforcement. The coefficient of friction exhibited an increasing trend and thereafter it decreased with increasing reinforcement at lower load. However, at higher load, an increase in the coefficient of friction is observed with an increase in reinforcement. SEM and EDS analysis revealed distinct wear mechanisms for different composites and different loads. The present study reveals that with addition of hard TiB2 particles the mechanical and tribological of AA6082 are improved. The results suggest that the developed composite material could be a potential material for various engineering applications.

Keywords

Composites In situ method AA6082 Friction Wear TiB2 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Prasad SV, Asthana R (2004) Aluminum metal-matrix composites for automotive applications: Tribological considerations. Tribol Lett 17(3):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Jayalakshmi and M. Gupta, Light Metal Matrix Composites, in Metallic Amorphous Alloy Reinforcements in Light Metal Matrices, Springer, 2015, pp. 7–58Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Anand, M. I. U. Haq, K. Vohra, A. Raina, and M. F. Wani, Role of green tribology in sustainability of mechanical systems: a state of the art survey, Mater Today Proc, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3659–3665, 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Dev, A. Aherwar, and A. Patnaik, Preliminary evaluations on development of recycled porcelain reinforced LM-26/Al-Si10Cu3Mg1 alloy for piston materials, Silicon, pp. 1–17, 2018Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirsch J (2014) Recent development in aluminium for automotive applications. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24(7):1995–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naik SK, Sanjay SJ, Math VB, Matti RS (2015) Connecting rod made using particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite - a review. J Emerg Technol Innov Res 2(12):228–233Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. I. Ul Haq and A. Anand (2018) Dry sliding friction and wear behaviour of hybrid AA7075/Si 3 N 4 /Gr self lubricating composites. Mater Res Express 5(6):66544.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aacc50
  8. 8.
    Yadav PK, Dixit G (2018) Erosive-corrosive Wear of Aluminium-silicon matrix (AA336) and SiC p/TiB 2p ceramic composites. Silicon:1–12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Irfan, U. Haq, and A. Anand, Dry sliding friction and Wear behavior of AA7075-Si 3 N 4 composite. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9675-1
  10. 10.
    A. Tyagi, Y. Koli, and D. Sharma, Fabrication & Mechanical Testing of AA6082/Si3N4 composites, 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharma P, Khanduja D, Sharma S (2014) Metallurgical and Mechanical Characterization of Al 6082-B<sub>4</sub>C/Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> Hybrid Composite Manufactured by Combined Ball Milling and Stir Casting. Appl Mech Mater 592–594:484–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma P, Sharma S, Khanduja D (2015) Production and some properties of Si3N4 reinforced aluminium alloy composites. J Asian Ceram Soc 3(3):352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Singh, S. P. Dwivedi, H. S. Pali, and M. T. Student, Wear Characterization of Aa6082 / Sic Composite Produced By Mechanical Stir Casting Process Department of Mechanical & Engineering , Noida Institute of Engineering and * Corresponding author Email Id : shashi_gla47@rediffmail.com, pp. 2–8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahrıman F, Zeren M (2017) The effect of Zr on aging kinetics and properties of as-cast AA6082 alloy. Int J Met 11(2):216–222Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Thangarasu, N. Murugan, I. Dinaharan, and ..., Processing and characterization of AA 6082/TiC composites by stir casting, Emerg. Mater. …, pp. 1–7, 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh G, Goyal S (2016) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of AA6082-T6/SiC/B4C-based aluminum hybrid composites. Part Sci Technol 0(0):1–8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeevan V, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N, Rao GB (2018) Fabrication and characterization of AA6082 ZTA composites by powder metallurgy process. Mater Today Proc 5(1):254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Teko\uglu, D. A\ugao\ugullar\i, S. Mertdinç, and M. L. Öveço\uglu, Effects of reinforcement content and sequential milling on the microstructural and mechanical properties of TiB2 particulate-reinforced eutectic Al-12.6 wt% Si composites, J Mater Sci, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 2537–2552, 2018Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akbari MK, Baharvandi HR, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2015) Tensile and fracture behavior of nano / micro TiB 2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater Des 66:150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Kamble, Grain refiner master alloys and grain modifiers for the aluminum foundry, pp. 1–11, 2016Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar N, Gautam G, Gautam RK, Mohan A, Mohan S (2016) Synthesis and characterization of TiB2 reinforced Aluminium matrix composites: a review. J Inst Eng Ser D 97(2):233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poria S, Sahoo P, Sutradhar G (2016) Tribological characterization of stir-cast aluminium-TiB 2 metal matrix composites. Silicon 8(4):591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. O. Lai, Impro v ement in mechanical properties of in-situ Al Á TiB 2 composite by incorporation of carbon, vol. 3, pp. 227–231, 2003Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asthana R (1998) Reinforced cast metals: part II evolution of the interface. J Mater Sci 33(8):1959–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren S, He X, Qu X, Li Y (2008) Effect of controlled interfacial reaction on the microstructure and properties of the SiCp/Al composites prepared by pressureless infiltration. J Alloys Compd 455(1):424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. R. Rajasekaran and V. Sampath, Effect of in-situ TiB2 particle addition on the mechanical properties of AA 2219 Al alloy composite, J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, p. 527, 2011Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Kumar, M. Chakraborty, V. S. Sarma, and B. S. Murty, Tensile and wear behaviour of in situ Al – 7Si / TiB 2 particulate composites, vol. 265, pp. 134–142, 2008Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. Mohanavel, K. Rajan, and K. R. Senthil Kumar, Study on Mechanical Properties of AA6351 Alloy Reinforced with Titanium Di-Boride (TiB<sub>2</sub>) Composite by <i>In Situ</i> Casting Method, Appl Mech Mater, vol. 787, pp. 583–587, 2015Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Michael Rajan HB, Ramabalan S, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ (2013) Synthesis and characterization of in situ formed titanium diboride particulate reinforced AA7075 aluminum alloy cast composites. Mater Des 44:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramesh CS, Ahamed A, Channabasappa BH, Keshavamurthy R (2010) Development of Al 6063-TiB2 in situ composites. Mater Des 31(4):2230–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suresh S, Moorthi NSV (2013) Process development in stir casting and investigation on microstructures and wear behavior of TiB2on A16061 MMC. Procedia Eng 64:1183–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lu L, Lai MO, Chen FL (1997) In situ preparation of TiB2 reinforced Al base composite. Adv Compos Mater 6(4):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeykrishnan J, Nathan SJ, Karthik MR (2017) Fabrication and characterization of aluminum titanium di-boride metal matrix composites using stir casting technique. Int J Mech Eng Technol 8(4):13–18Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ravnikar D, Mrvar P, Medved J, Grum J (2013) Microstructural analysis of laser coated ceramic components TiB2 and TiC on aluminium alloy en AW-6082-T651. Stroj Vestnik/Journal Mech Eng 59(5):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCartney DG (1989) Grain refining of aluminium and its alloys using inoculants. Int Mater Rev 34(1):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mallikarjuna C, Shashidhara SM, Mallik US, Parashivamurthy KI (2011) Grain refinement and wear properties evaluation of aluminum alloy 2014 matrix-TiB2 in-situ composites. Mater Des 32(6):3554–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang C, Wang M, Yu B, Chen D, Qin P, Feng M, Dai Q (2007) The grain refinement behavior of TiB2 particles prepared with in situ technology. Mater Sci Eng A 459(1–2):238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lawrance CA, Prabhu PS (2015) Al 6061-TiB 2 metal matrix composite synthesized with different reaction holding times by in-situ method. Int J Compos Mater 5(5):97–101Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hamid AA, Ghosh PK, Jain SC, Ray S (2006) Influence of particle content and porosity on the wear behaviour of cast in situ Al (Mn)--Al2O3 (MnO2) composite. Wear 260(4–5):368–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Keshavamurthy R, Mageri S, Raj G, Naveenkumar B, Kadakol PM, Vasu K (2013) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al7075-TiB 2 in-situ composite. Res J Mater Sci 1(10):6–10Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    C. Chen, J. Luo, Z. Guo, W. Yang, and J. Chen, Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of in situ TiB 2 / Al composites under high-intensity ultrasound, vol. 34, pp. 168–172, 2015Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R. G. Guan and D. Tie, A review on grain refinement of aluminum alloys: progresses, challenges and prospects, Acta Metall Sin (English Lett, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 409–432, 2017Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shen Y-L, Chawla N (2001) On the correlation between hardness and tensile strength in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 297(1–2):44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    K. R. Ramkumar, H. Bekele, and S. Sivasankaran, Experimental Investigation on Mechanical and Turning Behavior of Al 7075/x% wt. TiB2–1% Gr In Situ Hybrid Composite, Adv Mater Sci Eng, vol. 2015, 2015Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mandal A, Chakraborty M, Murty BS (2007) Effect of TiB2 particles on sliding wear behaviour of Al--4Cu alloy. Wear 262(1–2):160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang ZF, Zhang LC, Mai Y-W (1995) Particle effects on friction and wear of aluminium matrix composites. J Mater Sci 30(23):5999–6004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Mahamani, A. Jayasree, K. Mounika, K. R. Prasad, and N. Sakthivelan, Evaluation of mechanical properties of AA6061- TiB 2 / ZrB 2 in-situ metal matrix composites fabricated by K 2 TiF 6 – KBF 4 – K 2 ZrF 6 reaction system, vol. 10, pp. 185–200, 2015Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Archard J (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8):981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Baradeswaran A, Elaya Perumal A (Nov. 2013) Influence of B4C on the tribological and mechanical properties of Al 7075-B4C composites. Compos Part B Eng 54(1):146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ul Haq MI, Anand A (2018) Friction and Wear behavior of AA 7075- Si3N4 composites under dry conditions: effect of sliding speed. Silicon, Aug.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2012) A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of semisolid--liquid processed Al--Si matrix reinforced with coated B4C reinforcement. Trans Indian Inst Metals 65(2):145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Thakur SK, Dhindaw BK (2001) The influence of interfacial characteristics between SiCp and mg/Al metal matrix on wear, coefficient of friction and microhardness. Wear 247(2):191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Venkataraman B, Sundararajan G (2000) Correlation between the characteristics of the mechanically mixed layer and wear behaviour of aluminium, Al-7075 alloy and Al-MMCs. Wear 245(1–2):22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShri Mata Vaishno Devi UniversityKatraIndia

Personalised recommendations