, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 211–221 | Cite as

Wear Behaviour of Al-Silicon (LM13) Alloy Composite Reinforcement with TiC and ZrSiO4 Particles

  • Surendra Kumar PatelEmail author
  • Virendra Pratap Singh
  • Nitin Kumar
  • Basil Kuriachen
  • Raman Nateriya
Original Paper


This paper mainly reports a relative description, impacts of TiC and ZrSiO4 grains, blending extents on the slurry wear qualities and microstructural analysis of composite materials. The TiC/ZrSiO4 dual reinforced particles (DRP) of LM13 amalgam composite was blended effectively. Double strengthened composites (particles) were orchestrated through mixes of titanium carbide and zircon sand to LM13 amalgam framework composites. The LM13 compound composite with reinforcement tests were similarly arranged for correlation of double support particles on microstructural analysis and wear conduct in different slurry concentrations. The reinforcements particles are stimulated in the mixture by stir casting technique. The slurry disintegration wear conduct uncovers double molecule support that upgrades wear opposition when contrasted with single molecule fortification whenever blended in a precise rate. The results demonstrate a proper blend support (15 wt%) with titanium carbide and zircon sand particles in the stoichiometric proportion (10 and 5 wt%) individually into the grid. Analysis indicates the further enhancement in hardness and the wear behaviour are associated with extra amalgamation.


LM13 alloy Titanium carbide Zircon sand Quartz silica sand Slurry erosive wear 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors are appreciatively to acknowledge the MSME Laboratory, MANIT, Bhopal (INDIA) for providing innumerable characterization facilities of as-synthesized samples.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Singh V, Kumar S, Panwar RS, Panday OP (2012) Microstructural and wear behavior of dual reinforced particle (DRP) aluminum alloy composite. J Mater Sci 47:6633–6646Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar S, Panwar RS, Pandey OP (2012) Wear behavior at high temperature of dual-particle size zircon-sand-reinforced aluminum alloy composite. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 44:1548–1565Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desale GR, Gandhi BK, Jain SC (2012) Slurry erosion of ductile materials under normal impact condition. Wear 264:322–330Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thangarasu A, Murugan N, Vijay SJ, Dinaharan I (2012) Fabrication of AA1050/10wt.% TiC surface composite using friction stir processing. Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Materials: 277–281Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asuquo LO, Bassey EN, Ihoms AP (2013) Characteristics of zircon sand the effect on foundry casting. Journal of Mechanics & Industry Research 1:27–32Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandraveer S, Mer KKS (2013) Abrasion wear characterization of AL-Al2O3 in-situ particulate composite synthesized in open hearth furnace with manually controlled stirring method. International journal of advanced materials manufacturing & characterization 3:227–230Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michael Rajan HB, Ramabalan S, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ (2013) Effect of TiB2 content and temperature on sliding wear behavior of AA7075/TiB2 in situ aluminum cast composites. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 4:72–79Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henein H, Kaftelen H, Unlu N, Gultekin G, Lutfi Ovecoglu M (2011) Comparative processing-structure-property studies of Al-Cu matrix composites reinforced with TiC particulates. Arch Civ Mech Eng 42(7):812–824Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Assadi H, Alidokht SA, Abdollah-Zadeh A (2013) Effect of applied load on the dry sliding wear behaviour and the subsurface deformation on hybrid metal matrix composite. Wear 305(1–2):291–298Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazahary A, Shabani MO (2012) Study on microstructure and abrasive wear behavior of sintered Al matrix composite. Ceram Int 38:4263–4269Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viswanathan S, Mandal D (2013) Effect of re-melting on particle distribution and interface in SiC reinforced 2124Al matrix composite. Mater Charact 86:21–27Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bobic B, AleksandarVencl SA, Marinkovic A, Babic M (2010) Structural, mechanical and tribological properties of A356 aluminum alloy reinforced with Al2O3, SiC and SiC+ graphite particles. J Alloys Compd 506:631–639Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hou X, Zhang R, Fang D (2018) An ultralight silica-modified ZrO2–SiO2 aerogel composite with ultra-low thermal conductivity and enhanced mechanical strength. Scr Mater 143:113–116Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yadav PK, Dixit G (2018) Erosive-corrosive wear of aluminium-silicon matrix (AA336) and SiCp/TiB2p ceramic composites. Silicon. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naveena BE, Keshavamurthy R, Sekhar N (2018) Dry sliding wear behaviour of plasma sprayed flyash-al2o3 and flyash-sic coatings on the al6061 aluminum alloy. Silicon. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tiwari K, Gautam G, Kumar N, Mohan A, Mohan S (2018) Effect of primary silicon refinement on mechanical and wear properties of a hypereutectic Al-Si alloy. Silicon 10(5):2223–2239Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agarwal M, Srivastava R (2018) Friction, wear and mechanical properties of Al-Si LM6 cast alloy processed in semi-solid stage. Silicon 11:355–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patel SK, Kuriachen B, Kumar N, Nateriya R (2018) The slurry abrasive wear behaviour and microstructural analysis of A2024-SiC-ZrSiO4 metal matrix composite. Ceram Int 44:6426–6432Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das S (1997) The influence of matrix microstructure and particle reinforcement on the two-body abrasive wear of cast Al–Si-alloy composites. J Mater Sci Lett 16:1757–1760Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar N, Shukla A, Kumar N, Choudhary RNP (2019) Structural, electrical and magnetic properties of eco-friendly complex multiferroic material: Bi (Co0.35Ti0.35Fe0.30)O3. Ceram Int 45:822–831Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar N, Shukla A, Kumar N, Choudhary RNP, Kumar A (2018) Structural, electrical and multiferroic characteristics of lead-free multiferroic: bi (Co0.5Ti0.5)O3–BiFeO3 solid solution. RSC Adv 8:36939–36950Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Kumar, A. Shukla, R.N.P Choudhary (2018) Development of lead free multifunctional materials Bi (Co0.45Ti0.45Fe0.10)O3. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int, 28: 308–314Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh VP, Patel SK, Kumar N, Kuriachen B (2019) Parametric effect on dissimilar friction stir welded steel-magnesium alloys joints: a review. Journal of Science and Technology of Welding and Joining. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar N, Shukla A (2018) A novel approach to synthesize, studies of structural and electrical characteristic of Bi (Ni0.30Ti0.30Fe0.40)O3 nanoceramics. IOP Conf. Series. Mater Sci Eng 330:012025Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan MM, Dixit G (2017) Abrasive wear characteristics of silicon carbide particle reinforced zinc-based composite. Silicon 10:1315–1327Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Behler KD, Marvel CJ, La Salvia JC, Walck SD, Harmer MP (2018) Observations of grain boundary chemistry variations in a boron carbide processed with oxide additives. Scr Mater 142:106–110Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Uyyuru RK, Surappa MK, Brusethaug S (2007) Tribological behavior of Al–Si–SiCp composites/automobile brake pad system under dry sliding conditions. Tribol Int 40:365–373Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bucevaca D, Krstic V (2012) Microstructure-mechanical properties relations in SiC–TiB2 composite. Mater Chem Phys 133:197–204Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu L, Fan X, Wei S, Liu D, He Z, Zhang G, Zhou Y (2017) Microstructure and wear properties of high-speed steel with high molybdenum content under rolling-sliding wear. Tribol Int 116:39–46Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lai P, Gao X, Tang L, Guo X, Zhang L (2018) Effect of temperature on fretting wear behavior and mechanism of alloy 690 in water. Nucl Eng Des 327:51–60Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marques FP, Bozzi AC, Scandian C, Tschiptschin AP (2017) Microabrasion of three experimental cobalt-chromium alloys: Wear rates and wear mechanisms. Wear. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Konyashin I, Ries B, Hlawatschek S, Mazilkin A, Konyashin I, Ries B, Hlawatschek S, Mazilkin A (2018) Novel industrial hardmetals for mining, construction and wear applications. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 71:357–365Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu W, Zhang L (2018) Tool wear and its effect on the surface integrity in the machining of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Postlethwaite J, Tinker EB, Hawrylak MW (1974) Erosion-corrosion in slurry pipelines. Corrosion 30(8):285–290Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yin C-h, Liang Y-l, Jiang Y, Yang M, Long S-l (2017) Formation of nano-laminated structures in a dry sliding wear-induced layer under different wear mechanisms of 20CrNi2Mo steel. Appl Surf Sci 423:305–313Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ma L, Shi LB, Guo J, Liu QY, Wang WJ (2018) On the wear and damage characteristics of rail material under low temperature environment condition. Wear 394–395:149–158Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang P, Liu X, Lu W, Zhai W, Zhou M, Wang J (2018) Fretting wear behavior of CuNiAl against 42CrMo4 under different lubrication conditions. Tribol Int 117:59–67Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pan R, Ren R, Zhao X, Chen C (2018) Influence of microstructure evolution during the sliding wear of CL65 steel. Wear. Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boneh Y, Ze’evReches, Geotribology-Friction (2017) Wear and lubrication of faults. Tectonophysics. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nascimento EM, Amaral LM, D'Oliveira ASCM (2017) Characterization and wear of oxides formed on CoCrMoSi alloy coatings. Surf Coat Technol.
  41. 41.
    Nicholas T (1995) An approach to fatigue life modeling in titanium-matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 200:29–37Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cao W, Dong G, Xie Y-B, Peng Z (2018) Prediction of wear trend of engines via on-line wear debris monitoring. Tribol Int. Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jia X, Grejtak T, Krick B, Vermaak N (2017) Design of composite systems for rotary wear applications. Mater Des 135:281–292Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zeng G, Tansu N, Krick BA (2018) Moisture dependent wear mechanisms of gallium nitride. Tribol Int. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Madsen BW (1988) Measurement of erosion-corrosion synergism with a slurry wear test apparatus. Wear 123:127–142Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Peng Y, Wu T, Wang S, Peng Z (2017) Wear state identification using dynamic features of wear debris for on-line purpose. Wear 379-377:1885–1891Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhao M, Yao X, Zhu YF, Jiang Q (2018) Effect of the interface energy on the pressure-induced superheating of metallic nanoparticles embedded in a matrix. Scr Mater 142:23–27Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumar S, Sharma V, Panwar RS, Pandey OP (2012) Wear behavior of dual particle size (DPS) zircon sand reinforced aluminum alloy. Tribol Lett 47:231–251Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surendra Kumar Patel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Virendra Pratap Singh
    • 1
  • Nitin Kumar
    • 2
  • Basil Kuriachen
    • 1
  • Raman Nateriya
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology MizoramAizawlIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsNational Institute of Technology MizoramAizawlIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringMaulana Azad National Institute of TechnologyBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations