Advertisement

Silicon

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 155–169 | Cite as

Material Selection for Automotive Piston Component Using Entropy-VIKOR Method

  • Sanni Dev
  • Amit AherwarEmail author
  • Amar Patnaik
Original Paper

Abstract

Development and selection of appropriate material with unlike properties (density, hardness, compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, friction coefficient, wear rate and many others) for piston material is one of the most exigent tasks. Inappropriate material often causes component failure at some point during functioning. Therefore, in this article, piston material containing different amount of recycled porcelain (used as reinforcement) were manufactured by induction furnace. The density, mechanical strength and specific wear behaviour were tested. The weight percentages of porcelain were in the range of 0 wt%-8 wt% in the base i.e. LM-26 alloy (Al-Si10Cu3Mg1). Micro-hardness tester and universal testing machine (INSTRON-5967) apparatus were utilized to record the mechanical properties of the manufactured materials and Pin-on-disc tribometer was conducted to evaluate the friction coefficient and specific wear rate at room temperature. Since no single material could merely satisfy all the desired characteristics, the Entropy-VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenjemeaning) multi criterion decision technique was employed to choose the preeminent composite amongst the examined materials. The entropy was applied to calculate weights of criteria, and VIKOR method was implemented for the ranking of manufactured composites. From the results obtained, it was indicated that A-3 (having 6 wt.% porcelain) piston material possesses the best combination of all the properties for a given application. Also, sensitivity analysis is performed to study the stability and robustness of the ranking with respect to the weights of the criterions.

Keywords

Material selection LM-26 alloy Entropy-VIKOR Multi-criteria decision analysis Sensitivity analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Advance Material Research Centre and Advance Research Lab of Tribology at Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur for providing them experimental support to complete their research work smoothly.

References

  1. 1.
    Tjong SC (2014) Nanocrystalline materials, 2nd ed, Elsevier, London; Waltham, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu S, Li J (2010) China Foundry 7(4):408–412Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arsha AG, Jayakumar E, Rajan TPD, Antony V, Pai BC (2015) Mater Des 88:1201–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahdavi S, Akhlaghi F (2011) Tribol Lett 44:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jun D, Yao-hui L, Si-rong Y, Wen-fang L (2004) Wear 257:930–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh J, Chauhan A (2016) Ceram Int 42:56–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kukshal V, Gangwar S, Patnaik A (2015) Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications 229(2):91–105Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rohatgi PK, Schultz BF, Daoud A, Zhang WW (2010) Tribol Int 43:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosisa E, Eazhin VY, Savchenko S (2016) Res J Appl Sci 11(5):188–196Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang H, Binner J, Higginson R (2010) Wear 268:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leng J, Jiang L, Wu G, Tian S, Chen G (2009) Rare Metal Mater Eng 38:1894–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassan AM, Alrashdan A, Hayajneh MT, Mayyas AT (2009) Tribol Int 42:1230–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gui M, Kang SB (2001) Mater Trans A 32A:2383–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh J (2016) Friction 4(3):191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nieto A, Yang H, Jiang L, Schoenung JM (2017) Wear.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhan Y, Zhang G (2003) J Mater Sci Lett 22:1087–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ma W, Lu J (2011) Tribol Lett 41:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Srirangan AK, Paulraj S (2016) Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(2):811–817Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cicek K, Celik M (2010) Mater Des 31(4):2129–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jahan A, Edwards KL, Bahraminasab M (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of engineering materials in product design2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fayazbakhsh K, Abedian A (2010) Adv Space Res 45(6):741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar SR, Patnaik A, Bhatt IK, Singh T (2016) Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420716629825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ermatita S, Hartati R, Wardoyo HA (2011) Int J Comp Sci Info Tech 3(1):40–52Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh T, Patnaik A, Chauhan R (2016) Mater Des 89:1335–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bahraminasab M, Jahan A (2011) Mater Des 32:4471–4477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jahan A, Mustapha F, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Bahraminasab M (2011) Mater Des 32:1215–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aherwar A, Patnaik A, Bahraminasab M, Singh A (2017) Proc IMechE Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420717714495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ASTM G99-95 (2000) Standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on disc apparatus. Annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gangwar S, Bhat IK, Patnaik A (2016) Silicon 9:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bharath V, Nagaralb M, Auradib V, Kori SA (2014) Procedia Mater Sci 6:1658–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sayuti M, Sulaiman S, Hang Tuah Baharudin BT, Khairol M, Arifin A, Vijayaram TR, Suraya S (2011) Compos Key Eng Mater 471-472:727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suresh KR, Niranjan HB, Martin Jebaraj P, Chowdiah MP (2003) Wear 255:638–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramesh M, Karthikeyan T, Kumaravel A (2014) J Ind Pollut Control 30(1):109–116Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu X, Wang Y, Wang F (2007) Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 17:276–279Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahmada F, Lob SHJ, Aslam M, Haziqa A (2013) Procedia Eng 68:674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Seyed Reihani SM (2006) Mater Des 27:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aherwar A, Singh A, Patnaik A, Unune D (2018) Handbook, REAOA. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chauhan R, Singh T, Thakur NS, Patnaik A (2016) Renewable energy 99:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chauhan R, Singh T, Tiwari A, Patnaik A, Thakur NS (2017) Energy 134:360–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kok M, Ozdin K (2007) J Mater Process Technol 183:301–309Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elango G, Raghunath BK (2013) Procedia Engineering 64:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMadhav Institute of Technology and ScienceGwaliorIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMalaviya National Institute of TechnologyJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations