, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 109–116 | Cite as

Novel Polymer Nanocomposites Comprising Triazole Functional Silica for Dental Application

  • Umar S. Yushau
  • Lama Almofeez
  • Ayhan BozkurtEmail author
Original Paper


In the present work, the synthesis of novel nanocomposite polymer resins with silica bearing triazole functional groups was realized. Silica nanoparticles were produced by sol-gel method known as stöber process. Then the surface was modified with 1H-1,2,4-triazole to form functional silica nanoparticles. Dental nanocomposites were produced by insertion of functional nanoparticles into the Bis-GMA/TEGDMA different weight fractions. The initiator system was CQ/EDMAB:0.1:0.4 wt%, and then photopolymerization was carried out by means of LED light having wavelength of 450 nm–500 nm and power density of 1000 mW/cm2. FT-IR used to confirm the final structures of the functional nanoparticles as well as nanocomposites. The surface morphology of the materials was analyzed by SEM and thermal properties were studied by TGA. Cytotoxicity test and mechanical test were carried out to evaluate cell viability and mechanical properties of the materials, respectively. Sorption and solubility were conducted on the different formulations to obtain the mean sorption and solubility values of the materials. The test results demonstrated that the composition of the nanocomposite resins significantly changed their properties compared to control samples.


Dental nanocomposites Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity Sorption Solubility Mechanical analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. 1.
    Bowen RL (1963) Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 66:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stein P, Sullivan J, Haubenreich J, Osborne P (2005) Composite resin in medicine and dentistry. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 15(6):641–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Aure, P. Anto, M. Se, and A. D. Logue, (2006) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations : 17-year findings, 34: 427Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ (1994) Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125:687–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rueggeberg FA (2002) From vulcanite to vinyl, a history of resins in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 87:364–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moszner N, Salz U (2001) New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 26:535–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF (2003) Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater 19:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruddell DE, Maloney MM, Thompson JY (2002) Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 18:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Antonucci JM, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC (2002) Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskers—effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties. Biomaterials 23:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor DF, Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M, McGrath JE (1998) Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 19:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung C-M, Kim J-G, Kim M-S, Kim K-M, Kim K-N (2002) Development of a new photocurable composite resin with reduced curing shrinkage. Dent Mater 18:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atai M, Nekoomanesh M, Hashemi SA, Amani S (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer. Dent Mater 20:663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA, Fonseca RG, Vaz LG (2003) The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. J Dent 31:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei Y, Jin D, Wei G, Yang D, Xu J (1998) Novel organic–inorganic chemical hybrid fillers for dental composite materials. J Appl Polym Sci 70:1689–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xia Y, Zhang F, Xie H, Gu N (2008) Nanoparticle-reinforced resin-based dental composites. J Dent 36:450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC (2003) Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dent. Mater 19(5):–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fong H (2004) Electrospun nylon 6 nanofiber reinforced BIS-GMA/TEGDMA dental restorative composite resins. Polymer 45:2427–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang X, Cai Q, Zhang X, Wei Y, Xu M, Yang X, Ma Q, Cheng Y, Deng X (2016) Improved performance of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composites by net-like structures formed from SiO2 nanofiber fillers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 59:464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mofarrehi MR, Shojaosadati SA (2012) Antibacterial properties of pure titanium coated with silver nanoparticles. Int J Nano Biomater 4:281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge K-LV (1998) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 26:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferracane JL (2006) Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern?: is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 22:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Sadeghpour, Y. Ghasemi, Z. Rezaie, and S. Khabnadideh, (2012) Antibacterial Activity of Some New Azole Compounds 8: 267Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. A. Rahman et al., (2007) An optimized sol – gel synthesis of stable primary equivalent silica particles 294:102Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Stober and A. Fink, (1968) Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica Spheres in the Micron Size Range 1:69:62Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Sreenivasa, K. El-hami, T. Kodaki, and K. Matsushige, (2005) A novel method for synthesis of silica nanoparticles, 289:125Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Alzina, N. Sbirrazzuoli, and A. Mija, (2011) Epoxy-Amine Based Nanocomposites Reinforced by Silica Nanoparticles. Relationships between Morphologic Aspects , Cure Kinetics, and Thermal Properties, 22789Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    U. S. YUSHA’U, (2017) Synthesis and characterization of multi-functional azole silica based nanocomposites for dental application. İstanbul UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. S. Achilias, M. M. Karabela, and I. D. Sideridou, (2008) Thermal degradation of light-cured dimethacrylate resins Part I. Isoconversional kinetic analysis 472:74Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vouvoudi EC, Achilias DS, Sideridou ID (2015) Dental light-cured nanocomposites based on a dimethacrylate matrix : thermal degradation and isoconversional kinetic analysis in N 2 atmosphere. Thermochim Acta 599:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Standard I (2000) ISO 4049 polymer based filling, restorative and luting materials. Int Organ Stand 1Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Samuel SP, Li S, Mukherjee I, Guo Y, Patel AC, Baran G, Wei Y (2009) Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent Mater 25:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leprince J, Palin W, Mullier T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G (2010) Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J Oral Rehabil 37:364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Roman, M. Moldovan, and P. Iuliu, (2012) Study Regarding some Physico-chemical Properties of Composite Resins for Direct Restoration vol. 31, no. 3 pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang H, Zhu M, Li Y, Zhang Q, Wang H (2011) Mechanical properties of dental resin composites by co- fi lling diatomite and nanosized silica particles. Mater Sci Eng C 31:600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cramer NB, Couch CL, Schreck KM, Carioscia JA, Boulden JE, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN (2010) Investigation of thiol-ene and thiol-ene-methacrylate based resins as dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 26:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of chemistryIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biophysics, IRMCImam Abdulrrahman bin Faisal UniversityDammamSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations