pp 1–12 | Cite as

Evaluation of Microstructure, Mechanical, Thermal and Erosive Wear Behavior of Aluminum-Based Composites

  • Mohammad Mohsin KhanEmail author
  • Gajendra Dixit
Original Paper


In the present study, we have shown the effect of a varying content of silicon carbide (SiC, 0, 10 and 15 wt.%) on the microstructure, mechanical, thermal and erosive wear behavior aluminum alloy (LM13). The erosive wear response was thoroughly studied by the sample rotation technique using slurry pot erosion tester. The influence of critical parameters; speed, sand content and slurry environment on the wear behavior have been studied. In order to examine the influence of the SiC particle, matrix alloy was also characterized under identical conditions. The microstructural studies of the composite suggest that there is the presence of significant interaction between the matrix and SiC particles. In the composite, the SiC particles were uniformly distributed, but dispersing SiC particles eventually deteriorate the tensile and fatigue life under the present domain of experiments. The composite exhibited minimum wear rate than the matrix alloy in an acidic and saline medium, however, the matrix showed enhanced wear resistance in the basic media (when compared to that of SiC reinforced composites). The rate of material loss is found to be higher with increased sand concentration due to an increase in the impinging action of the sand particles. The study reveals that the loss of material was due to the combined effect of corrosive, erosive and abrasive actions of the slurry medium. Erosion mechanism is found to be a predominant in the acidic medium, whereas corrosion is responsible in the case of the basic medium.


Erosion-corrosion Aluminum-silicon alloy Metal matrix composites SiC particulate SEM 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors acknowledge the Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, and CSIR-AMPRI, Bhopal (Advanced Materials & processes Research Institute) for providing laboratory facilities. Authors also acknowledge the support from the Advanced Centre for Materials Science (ACMS) at IITK for Electron Microscopy and Mechanical characterization facilities.


  1. 1.
    Selvam JDR, Smart DR, Dinaharan I (2013) Microstructure and some mechanical properties of fly ash particulate reinforced AA6061 aluminum alloy composites prepared by compocasting. Mater Des 49:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chawla KK (2012) Composite materials: science and engineering. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handbook A (2008) Volume 15 Casting. Materials Park: ASM International, p. 416–522Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan MM, Dixit G (2017) Effects of test parameters and SiCp reinforcement on the slurry erosive wear response of Al-Si alloy. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(2):3141–3149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tavoosi M, Karimzadeh F, Enayati M (2008) Fabrication of Al–Zn/α-Al2O3 nanocomposite by mechanical alloying. Mater Lett 62(2):282–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalaiselvan K, Murugan N, Parameswaran S (2011) Production and characterization of AA6061–B4C stir cast composite. Mater Des 32(7):4004–4009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiu Z, Yang W, Chen G, Jiang L, Ma K, Wu G (2012) Microstructure and tensile properties of Si3N4p/2024Al composite fabricated by pressure infiltration method. Mater Des 33:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amirkhanlou S, Rezaei MR, Niroumand B, Toroghinejad MR (2011) High-strength and highly-uniform composites produced by compocasting and cold rolling processes. Mater Des 32(4):2085–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srivastava V, Ojha S (2005) Microstructure and electrical conductivity of Al-SiC p composites produced by spray forming process. Bull Mater Sci 28(2):125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahimian M, Ehsani N, Parvin N, Baharvandi H (2009) The effect of particle size, sintering temperature and sintering time on the properties of Al–Al2O3 composites, made by powder metallurgy. J Mater Process Technol 209(14):5387–5393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srinivasarao B, Suryanarayana C, Oh-ishi K, Hono K (2009) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Zr nanocomposite materials. Mater Sci Eng A 518(1–2):100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixit G, Khan MM (2014) Sliding Wear response of an Aluminium metal matrix composite: effect of solid lubricant particle size. JJMIE 8(6)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan M, Dixit G (2017) Erosive wear response of SiCp reinforced aluminium based metal matrix composite: effects of test environments. JMES 14:2401–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kok M (2005) Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Technol 161(3):381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramesh C et al (2009) Influence of heat treatment on slurry erosive wear resistance of Al6061 alloy. Mater Des 30(9):3713–3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu S, Ishii H, Chuang T (1996) Corrosive wear of SiC whisker-and particulate-reinforced 6061 aluminum alloy composites. Metall Mater Trans A 27(9):2653–2662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lentzaris K et al (2017) Solid particle Erosion of aluminum in-situ reinforced with a cobalt aluminide. Mater Sci Eng Adv Res (Special):19–25Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramesh CS, Khan S, Khan Z, Sridhar KS (2014) Slurry erosive wear behavior of hot extruded Al6061-Si3N4 composite. Mater Sci Forum, vol. 773, pp. 454–460. Trans Tech PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saxena M, Modi OP, Prasad BK, Jha AK (1993) Erosion and corrosion characteristics of an aluminium alloy-alumina fibre composite. Wear 169(1):119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norma A (1996) E466-96 Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, Filadelfia (EE. UU.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan MM, Dixit G (2017) Comparative study on erosive Wear response of SiC reinforced and Fly ash reinforced Aluminium based metal matrix composite. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(9):10093–10098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh M, Mondal DP, Modi OP, Jha AK (2002) Two-body abrasive wear behaviour of aluminium alloy–sillimanite particle reinforced composite. Wear 253(3–4):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan MM, Gurupanchayan V, Dixit G (2016) Abrasive Wear response of SiC p reinforced ZA-43 alloy metal matrix composite. Indian J Sci Technol 9(33)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan MM, Dixit G (2017) Abrasive Wear characteristics of silicon carbide particle reinforced zinc based composite. Silicon:1–13Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan MM, Dixit G (2016) Effects of test environment on the sliding wear behaviour of cast iron, zinc-aluminium alloy and its composite. WASET, International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 3(4)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mousavian RT, Khosroshahi RA, Yazdani S, Brabazon D (2017) Manufacturing of cast A356 matrix composite reinforced with nano-to micrometer-sized SiC particles. Rare Metals 36(1):46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reddy AC (2011) Tensile fracture behaviour of 7072/SiCp metal matrix composites fabricated by gravity die casting process. Mater Technol 26(5):257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tu S, Zhang X (2016) Fatigue crack initiation mechanisms. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. p. 1–23Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hiremath A, Hemanth J (2017) Experimental Evaluation of the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Chilled Aluminum Alloy-Borosilicate Glass (P) CompositeGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ceschini L et al (2017) Aluminum and magnesium metal matrix nanocomposites. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang L, Geng L (2017) Discontinuously reinforced titanium matrix composites. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kalantari M, Dong C, Davies IJ (2017) Effect of matrix voids, fibre misalignment and thickness variation on multi-objective robust optimization of carbon/glass fibre-reinforced hybrid composites under flexural loading. Compos Part B 123:136–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saraswathi Y, Das S, Mondal D (2006) Influence of microstructure and experimental parameters on the erosion–corrosion behavior of Al alloy composites. Mater Sci Eng A 425(1–2):244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saraswathi Y, Das S, Mondal D (2001) A comparative study of corrosion behavior of Al/SiCp composite with cast iron. Corrosion 57(7):643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mayyas AT et al (2012) Effect of copper and silicon carbide content on the corrosion resistance of Al-mg alloys in acidic and alkaline solutions. Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering 11(4):435–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologySrinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations