Advertisement

Silicon

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Influence of pH and Temperature on Structural, Optical and Catalytical Investigations of CeO2-SiO2 Nanoparticles

  • Muhammad Akhyar FarrukhEmail author
  • Komal Mehmood Butt
  • Amna Altaf
  • Sadia khadim
Original Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized by surfactant assisted via sol-gel process at variable pH 9, 10 and 11 by keeping constant temperature of 27 ± 2 °C. However, same method was adopted for synthesis of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles at higher temperature 70 ± 2 °C while pH of the solution was kept constant at 9. Prepared nanoparticles were characterized using FTIR, SEM-EDX, PL spectrophotometer, UV-Vis spectrophotometer, XRD and DLS-PSA. Influence of varying pH and temperature on particle size, band gap, oxygen vacancies and catalytic activity for degradation of chlorpyrifos pesticide was studied. It was found that increase in pH increased the particle size and band gap, however decreased the catalytic activity towards chlorpyrifos pesticide. It was observed that increase in temperature at constant pH 9 showed slight effects on above mentioned properties. CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles prepared at pH 9 and at temperature 27 ± 2 °C were found to have lowest particle size and band gap with highest catalytic activity.

Keywords

Band gap Oxygen vacancies Degradation Photocatalysis Pesticide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author (Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh) is thankful to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan for providing funds for the Project No. 20-3142/NRPU/R&D/HEC/14 entitled “Synthesis of iron doped CeO2-SiO2 nanocomposites for catalytic degradation of organophosphorus pesticides in water”.

References

  1. 1.
    Bootharaju MS, Pradeep T (2012) Understanding the degradation pathway of the pesticide, chlorpyrifos by noble metal nanoparticles. Langmuir 28:2671–2679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahdavi M, Ahmad MB, Haron MJ (2013) Synthesis, surface modification and characterisation of biocompatible magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Molecules 18:7533–7548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farrukh MA, Shahid M, Muneer I, Javaid S (2016) Influence of gadolinium precursor on the enhanced red shift of Gd/SnO2–TiO2 nanoparticles and catalytic activity. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:2994–3002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farrukh MA, Muneer I, Butt KM (2016) Effect of dielectric constant of solvents on the particle size and bandgap of La/SnO2-TiO2 nanoparticles and their catalytic properties. J Chin Chem Soc 63:952–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imtiaz A, Farrukh MA, Khaleeq-ur-Rahman (2013) Micelle-assisted synthesis of Al2O3·CaO nanocatalyst:optical properties and their applications in photodegradation of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol. Sci World J 641420:11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farrukh MA, Thong CK, Adnan R (2012) Preparation and characterization of zinc oxide nanoflakes using anodization method and their photodegradation activity on methylene blue. Russ J Phys Chem A 86:2041–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sancheti SV, Saini C, Ambati R, Gogate PR (2018) Synthesis of ultrasound assisted nanostuctured photocatalyst (NiO supported over CeO2) and its application for photocatalytic as well as sonocatalytic dye degradation. Catal Today 300:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin KS, Chowdhury S (2010) Synthesis, characterization, and application of 1-D ceriumoxide nanomaterials: a review. Int J Mol Sci 11:3226–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao KS, El-Hami K, Kodaki T, Matsushige K, Makino K (2005) A novel method for synthesis of silica nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 28:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman IA, Padavettan V (2012) Synthesis of silica nanoparticles by sol-gel: size-dependent properties, surface modification, and applications in silica-polymer nanocomposites—a review. J Nanomater 132424:15.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/132424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farahmandjou M, Zarinkamar M, Firoozabadi TP (2016) Synthesis of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles using simple CO-precipitation method. Rev Mex Fis 62:496–499Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harraz FA, Abdel-Salam OE, Mostafa AA, Mohamed RM, Hanaf M (2013) Rapid synthesis of titania–silica nanoparticles photocatalyst by a modified sol–gel method for cyanide degradation and heavy metals removal. J Alloys Compd 551:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benedetti F, Luches P, Spadaro MC, Gasperi G, D’Addato S, Valeri S, Boscherini F (2015) Structure and morphology of silver nanoparticles on the (111) surface of cerium oxide. J Phys Chem C 119:6024–6032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Imtiaz A, Farrukh MA (2016) Influence of CdS dopant on oxygen vacancies and Ce3+ formationin CeO2–ZnO nanocomposites: structural, optical andcatalytic properties. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:2788–2794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang F, Cheng CH (2006) Phases in ceria–zirconia binary oxide (1x)CeO2–xZrO2 nanoparticles: the effect of particle size. J Am Ceram Soc 89:1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohan S, Navamani P, Jayamoorthy K, Srinivasan N (2017) Nano-silica catalyzed synthesis, solvent effect, NMR spectral and DFT studies of some imidazole derivatives. Silicon 9:817–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adam F, Appaturi JN, Thankappan R, Navi MAM (2010) Silica–tin nanotubes prepared from rice husk ash by sol–gel method: characterization and its photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 257:811–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alalm MG, Tawfik A, Ookawara S (2015) Comparison of solar TiO2 photocatalysis and solar photo-Fenton fortreatment of pesticides industry wastewater: operational conditions, kinetics, and costs. J Water Proc Eng 8:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Javaid S, Farrukh MA, Muneer I, Shahid M, Khaleeq-ur-Rahman M, Umar AA (2015) Influence of optical band gap and particle size on the catalytic properties of Sm/SnO2–TiO2 nanoparticles. Superlattice Microst 82:234–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cochran RC (2002) Appraisal of risks from nonoccupational exposure to chlorpyrifos. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 35:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Afzaal A, Farrukh MA (2017) Zwitterionic surfactant assisted synthesis of Fe doped SnO2-SiO2 nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activity under sun light. Mater Sci Eng B 223:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li M, Hu Y, Liu C, Huang J, Liu Z, Wang M, An Z (2013) Synthesis of cerium oxide particles via polyelectrolyte controlled nonclassical crystallization for catalytic application. The RSC Adv 4:992–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gnanam S, Rajendran V (2013) Influence of various surfactants on size, morphology, and optical properties of CeO2 nanostructures via facile hydrothermal route. J Nanoparticle 839391:6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    An D, Guo Y, Zhu Y, Wang Z (2010) A green route to preparation of silica powders with rice husk ash and waste gas. Chem Eng J 162:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jiang C, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang T (2013) Superhydrophobic polyurethane and silica nanoparticles coating with high transparency and fluorescence. J Appl Polym Sci 129:2959–2965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang J, Ge X, Wang M (2012) Facile fabrication of flower-like nanocomposite microparticles via seeded miniemulsion polymerization. Polym Chem 3:2011–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sevik C, Bulutay C (2007) Theoretical study of the insulating oxides and nitrides: SiO2, GeO2, Al2O3, Si3N4, and Ge3N4. J Mater Sci 42:6555–6565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laberty-Robert C, Long JW, Lucas EM, Pettigrew KA, Stroud RM, Doescher MS, Rolison DR (2006) Sol−gel-derived ceria nanoarchitectures: synthesis, characterization, and electrical properties. Chem Mate 18:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colis S, Bouaine A, Schmerber G (2012) High-temperature ferromagnetism in co-doped CeO2 synthesized by the coprecipitation technique. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:7256–7263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Balestrieri M, Colis S, Gallart M, Schmerber G, Ziegler M, Gilliot P, Dinia A (2015) Photoluminescence properties of rare earth (Nd, Yb, Sm, Pr)-doped CeO2 pellets prepared by solid-state reaction. J Mater Chem C 3:7014–7021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lim J, Yeap SP, Che HX, Low SC (2013) Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle by dynamic light scattering. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun C, Li H, Chen L (2012) Nanostructured ceria-based materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Energy Environ Sci 5:84785–88505Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu X-D, Huebner W (2001) Size-induced lattice relaxation in CeO2 nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 79:3512–3514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Butt KM, Farrukh MA, Muneer I (2016) Influence of lanthanum doping via hydrothermal and reflux methods on the SnO2–TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method and their catalytic properties. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:8493–8498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao X, Long R, Chen Y, Chen Z (2010) Synthesis, characterization of CeO2@SiO2 nanoparticles and their oxide CMP behavior. Microelectron Eng 87:1716–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee S-H, Lu Z, Babu VS, Matijević E (2002) Chemical mechanical polishing of thermal oxide films using silica particles coated with ceria. J Mater Res 17:2744–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lin J, Wu Y, Khayambashi A, Wang X, Wei Y (2018) Preparation of a novel CeO2/SiO2 adsorbent and its adsorption behavior for fluoride ion. Adsorpt Sci Technol 36:743–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Farrukh MA, Butt KM, Chong K-K, Chang WS (2018) Photoluminescence emission behaviour on the reduced band gap of Fe doping in CeO2-SiO2 nanocomposite and photophysical properties. J Saudi Chem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2018.10.002
  39. 39.
    Pervaiz S, Farrukh MA, Adnan R, Qureshi FA (2012) Kinetic investigation of redox reaction between vitamin C and ferric chloride hexahydrate in acidic medium. J Saudi Chem Soc 16:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryForman Christian College (A Chartered University)LahorePakistan
  2. 2.Nano-Chemistry LaboratoryGovernment College University LahoreLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations