Tailoring the Structural and Optical Parameters of Eu3+:CeO2-SiO2 Nanopowder Via Thermal Treatment
- 14 Downloads
Nanocrystalline Eu3+:CeO2-SiO2 powder samples were prepared by sol-gel technique. This technique is suitable for large-scale production and it is also a cost effective process. The prepared samples were annealed at different temperatures which were characterized by many complementary techniques. The formation of cubic fluorite structure of CeO2 nanocrystal with a uniform distribution was confirmed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The average nanocrystalline size has been calculated as 3, 7 and 15 nm using Debye-Scherrer formula for different annealed samples. The calculated nanocrystalline sizes were compared with W-H plot and TEM histograms. It was investigated that FWHM of diffraction peaks decreases with increase in temperature results in increase nanocrystalline size. The FTIR spectroscopy provides the valuable information and identification of different chemical group/bonds present in the prepared samples. It is found that if we fixed the dopant concentration, then particle size, morphology and band gap energy of prepared nanopowder can be tailored by applying the annealing conditions. Comparative studies of absorption spectra and corresponding band gap energies have been done and a red shift has been observed in absorption spectra with thermal treatment. The shift of the optical absorption edge of prepared nanopowder towards lower energies increases its utilization in the visible region specially photocatalytic activity.
KeywordsNanopowder Structural properties Thermal annealing Absorption spectra Band gap energy etc.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Khachatouriana AM, Golestani-Fardb F, Sarpoolaky H, Vogt C, Toprak MS (2015). Colloids Surf A 41:2006Google Scholar
- 9.Sun X, Wen J, Guo Q, Zhenyi FP, Luo CY, Peng G, Wang T (2017). Opt Mater Express 7:751Google Scholar
- 10.Anitha R, Ramesh KV, Sudheer kumar KH (2017). Int J Pharm Bio Sci 8:933Google Scholar
- 11.Parvathya S, Venkatramanb BR (2017). J Nanosci Curr Res 2:2Google Scholar
- 22.Ahlawat R (2015). Mod Phys Lett B 2:1550046Google Scholar
- 29.Patsalas P, Logothetidis S, Sygellou L, Kennou S (2003). Phys Rev B 68:035104Google Scholar