pp 1–17 | Cite as

Mechanical Properties and Morphologies of High Density Polyethylene Reinforced with Calcium Carbonate and Sawdust Compatibilized with Vinyltriethoxysilane

  • Boonsri KusukthamEmail author
Original Paper


In this study, the influence of vinyltriethoxysilane on the mechanical and morphological properties of high density polyethylene filled with calcium carbonate and sawdust were investigated. The fillers were treated with 2% (v/v) vinyltriethoxysilane before mixing with the high density polyethylene. The results showed that the modification of the fillers with the vinyltriethoxysilane promoted the adhesion between the matrix and fillers. All of fillers increased the modulus and tensile strength of the high density polyethylene composites but the %elongation at break decreased. Also, the fillers loading increased the mechanical properties of the composites. The mechanical properties of the high density polyethylene/calcium carbonate composite was higher than the high density polyethylene/sawdust composite. In addition, vinyltriethoxysilane with acted as the modifying agent of the fillers slight increased the mechanical properties of the composites. The factors that influencing the mechanical properties of the high density polyethylene composites were type of fillers, particle loading and vinyltriethoxysilane. In addition, the thermal properties of the high density polyethylene composite were related to type of fillers and vinyltriethoxysilane.


Vinyltriethoxysilane High density polyethylene Sawdust Calcium carbonate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Su CY, Tang HZ, Chu K, Lin CK (2014) Cosmetic properties of TiO2/mica-BN composite powder prepared by spray drying. Ceram Int 40:6903–6911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang R, Xu X, Lee S, Zhang Y, Kim BJ, Wu Q (2013) High density polyethylene composites reinforced with hybrid inorganic fillers: morphology, mechanical and thermal expansion performance. Material 6:4122–4138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saeed U, Hussain K, Rizvi G (2014) HDPE Reinforced with glass fibers: rheology, tensile properties, stress relaxation, and orientation. Polym Composite 35:2159–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erol M (2013) Graphite-flake carbon- black-reinforced polystyrene-matrix composite films deposited on glass-fiber woven fabrics as plane heaters. Mater and Technol 47:25–28Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar PN, Rajadurai A, Muthuramalingam T (2018) Multi-response optimization on mechanical properties of silica fly ash filled polyester composites using taguchi-grey relational analysis. Silicon 10:1723–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuhaira AAN, Rahmah M (2013) Effect of calcium carbonate on thermal properties of CaCO3/ Kenaf/HDPE and CaCO3/Rice Husk/HDPE composite. Adv Mat Res 812:175–180Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saeedi M, Sharahi SJ (2010) Morphological and thermal properties of HDPE/ CaCO3nanocomposites: Effect of content of nano and MFI. In: International Conference on Nanotechnology and Biosensors. IACSIT, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garbarski J, Fabijański M (2013) The mechanical properties of a mixture of high density polyethylene and calcium carbonate dedicated for packaging. Adv Manufac Sci and Technol 37:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Migneault S, Koubaa A, Erchiqui F, Chaala A, Englund K, Krause C, Wolcott M (2008) Effect of fiber length on processing and properties of extruded wood-fiber / HDPE composites. J Appl Polym Sci 110:1085–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petchwattana N, Sanetuntikul J (2018) Static and dynamic mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) and waste rice husk ash composites compatibilized with γaminopropyltrimethoxy silane. Silicon 10:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nath S, Priyanka JH, Sahini D (2018) Analysis of mechanical properties of jute epoxy composite with cenosphere filler. Silicon:
  12. 12.
    Li X, Panigrahi S, Tabil LG (2009) A study on flaxfiber-reinforced polyethylene biocomposites. App Eng Agric 25:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Viet CX, Ismail H, Rashid AA, Takeichi T (2012) Kenaf powder filled recycled high density polyethylene/ naturalrubber biocomposites: the effect of filler content. Int J Integr Eng 4: 22–25Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stevulova N, Kidalova L, Cigasova J, Junak J, Sicakova A, Terpakova E (2013) Lightweight composites containing hemp hurds. Procedia Eng 65:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shah DU (2013) Developing plant fiber composites for structural applications by optimizing composite parameters: a critical review. J Mater Sci 48:6083–6107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mantia FP, Morreale M (2011) Green composite:A brief review. Compos Part A 42:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rhee KY, Park SJ, Hui D, Qiu Y (2012) Effect of oxygen plasma-treated carbon fibers on the tribological behavior of oil-absorbed carbon/epoxy woven composites. Compos Part B 43:2395–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rein A (2014) Analysis of plasma treated carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites by portable Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): Agilent Technologies, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prakash VRA, Jaisingh SJ (2018) Mechanical strength behaviour of silane treated e-glass fiber/Al 6061 & SS-304 wire mesh reinforced epoxy resin hybrid composite. Silicon:
  20. 20.
    Wu W, Wang J (2018) Effect of KH550 on the preparation and compatibility of carbon fibers reinforced silicone rubber composites. Silicon:
  21. 21.
    Dhanapal D, Srinivasan1 AK, Ramalingam N (2018) Role of POSS as coupling agent for DGEBA/GF reinforced nanocomposites. Silicon 10:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mojumdar SC, Raki L (2005) Preparation and properties of calcium silicate hydrate-poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite materials. J Therm Anal Cal 82:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carrott SPJM, Carrott MMLR (2007) Lignin– from natural adsorbent to activated carbon: a review. Bioresource Technol 98:2301–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shieh YT, Liu CM (1999) Silane grafting reactions of LDPE, HDPE, and LLDPE. J Appl Polym Sci 74:3404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franco GEL, Huang A, Camacho NP, Stone DS, Blank RD (2006) Increased young’s modulus and hardness of col1a2oim dentin. J Dent Res 85:1032–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Killmann W (2014) The wood database: Eric Meier. Accessed 22 Oct 2014
  27. 27.
    Westrup JL, Paula MMDS, Dal-Bó AG, Benavides R, Caldart CA, Coronetti JC, Doy TA, Frizon T, Silva L (2014) Effect of chemical treatments on the properties of HDPE composites with Luffa cylindrical fiber. Cellulose Chem Technol 48:337–344Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Domka L, Malicka A, Stachowiak N (2008) Production and structural investigation of polyethylene composites with modified kaolin. ACTA Physica Polonica A 114:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhu P, Sui S, Wang B, Sun K, Sun G (2004) A study of pyrolysis and pyrolysis products of flame-retardant cotton fabrics by DSC, TGA, and PY-GC-MS. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 71:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Textile Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Textile IndustriesRajamangala University of Technology KrungthepBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations