pp 1–5 | Cite as

Non-destructive Testing of a Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cell: Magnetic Field - Electrical Properties Correlation

  • A. IbrahimEmail author
Original Paper


Magnetic field - Electrical characteristic correlation for a silicon solar cell (Si-SC) of n+ pp + structure was studied in the dark and illumination modes. In the dark, both the current and the voltage decreased with increasing the magnetic field in forward bias. However, in reverse bias, the behavior was quite different. Under illumination, the effect of magnetic field on I-V characteristics of the (Si-SC) was studied experimentally. Both short circuit current (Isc) and open circuit voltage (Voc) were measured under the influence of magnetic field. Isc under 200 mT decreased by 0.7 mA (i.e. 2.2%) while the corresponding value for Voc shows a reduction by 1.93%. The SC efficiency and the fill factor (FF) were calculated with and without the magnetic field. The Si SC efficiency and the fill factor were decreased by 7.04 % and 2.70%, respectively, under a magnetic field of 200 mT. This quality investigation, testing of the SC under magnetic field could be considered as one of the non-destructive reliability tools.


Silicon solar cell Magnetic field effect I–V characteristics Dark and illumination modes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chopra KL, Paulson PD, Dutta V (2004) Thin-film solar cells: an overview. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 12:69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handy R (1967) Theoretical analysis of the series resistance of a solar cell. Solid-State Electron 10:765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolf M, Rauschenbacht H (1963) Series resistance effects on solar cell measurements. Adv Energy Convers Adv Energy Conv 3:455–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kobayashi E, De Wolf S, Levrat J, Descoeudres A, Despeisse M, Haug F-J, Ballif C (2017) Increasing the efficiency of silicon heterojunction solar cells and modules by light soaking. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 173:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shakya P, Desai P, Kreouzis T, Gillin WP, Tuladhar SM, Ballantyne AM, Nelson J (2008) The effect of applied magnetic field on photocurrent generation in poly-3-hexylthiophene:[6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester photovoltaic devices. J Phys Condens Matter 20(45):452203(4pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibrahim A, Ramadan MRI (2011) Characteristics of Global Solar Radiation Monitor Utilizing Solar Cells. J Sol Energy Eng 134(1):014503(4 pages)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibrahim A, El-Aasser MA (2014) Performance analysis of γ-radiation test monitor using monocrystalline n+ pp + + silicon solar cell: CsI(Tl) Scintillator. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014 (Article ID 345831):5. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diab HM, Ibrahim A, El-Mallawany R (2013) Silicon solar cells as a gamma ray dosimeter. Measurement 46(9):3635–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalinowski J, Cocchi M, Virgili D, Di Marco P, Fattori V (2003) Magnetic field effects on emission and current in Alq3-based electroluminescent diodes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 380:710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serafettin E, Mustafa A, Gazi Kamil E, Celik V (2006) The behaviour of a typical single-crystal Si solar cell under high intensity of electric field. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 90:582–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dieng A, Thiam N, Thiam A, Maiga AS, Sissoko G (2011) Magnetic field effect on the electrical parameters of a polycrystalline silicon solar cell. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(7):602–61Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soika E, Moller HJ (2004) Magnetic field measurements and numerical simulation of the current distribution in the emitter region of solar cells. J Magn Magn Mater 272–276:667–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mell H, Movaghar B (1980) Influence of magnetic field on the charge transport in amorphous silicon photovoltaic diodes. J Non-Crystall Solids 35-36(Part 2):761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamdy M, Call R (1987) Effect of diode ideality factor on determination of series resistance of solar cells. Solar Cells 20(2):119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aberle A et al (1993) New method for accurate measurement of the lumped series resistance of solar cells. In: 23rd IEEE PVSC, pp 133–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IEEE Std 1272 (1996) Recommended Practice for Qualification of Photovoltaic (PV) ModulesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    King DL, Dudley JK (1996) PVSIM: A simulation program for cells, modules, and arrays. In: 25th IEEE PVSC, pp 1295–1297Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S Madougou F, Made MS, Boukary G, Sissoko I-V (2007) Characteristics for bifacial silicon solar cell under a magnetic field.. In: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 18-19) Advances in Materials and Systems Technologies, June, 2007, pp 303–312Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    von Helmolt R, Wecker J, Holzapfel B, Schultz L, Samwer K (1993) Giant negative magnetoresistance in perovskitelike La2/3Ba1/3MnOx ferromagnetic films. Phys Rev Lett 71:2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chahara K, Ohno T, Kasai M, Kozono Y (1993) Appl Phys Lett 63:1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin S, Tiefel TH, McCormack M, Fastnacht RA, Ramesh R, Chen LH (1994) Science 264:413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Volkov NV, Tarasov AS, Rautskii MV, Lukyanenko AV, Bondarev IA, Varnakov SN, Ovchinnikov SG (2018) Magneto-transport phenomena in metal/SiO2/n(p)-Si hybrid structures. J Magn Magn Mater 451:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics department, Faculty of ScienceTanta UniversityTantaEgypt

Personalised recommendations