Silicon

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 51–56 | Cite as

A Comparison of Protease Active Sites and their Ability to Process Silicon-Based Substrates

Original Paper

Abstract

Many enzymes have been identified that can participate in the hydrolysis of alkoxysilanes; each with a different degree of specificity. Our working hypothesis was that the nature of the active site of the enzyme (i.e., the compatibility of binding pockets with the substrate) could have a direct effect on the rate of catalysis. This communication reports our experiments on the relative rates of hydrolysis of a model alkoxysilane, phenyltrimethoxysilane (PTMS), by three proteases: trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and pepsin. Trypsin which typically accepts amino acids bearing positively charged basic residues was not particularly proficient for the hydrolysis of PTMS. On the other hand, both α-chymotrypsin and pepsin, each of which contains a binding pocket, or two in the case of pepsin, suitable for accommodating aromatic residues, were more suitable for mediating hydrolysis. This report provides some preliminary data to support the hypothesis that the architecture of the enzyme active site is important in determining the proficiency with which an enzyme will process a given organosilicon substrate.

Keywords

Silicon Biotechnology Enzymes Alkoxysilane Active Site 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frampton M, Vawda A, Fletcher J, Zelisko PM (2008) Chem Commun 5545Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frampton M, Simionescu R, Zelisko PM (2009) Silicon 1:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frampton MB, Simionescu R, Dudding T, Zelisko PM (2010) J MolCat B: Enz 66:105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassindale AR, Brandstadt KF, Lane TH, Taylor PG (2003) J Inorg Biochem 96:401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbate V, Bassindale AR, Brandstadt KF, Lawson R, Taylor PG (2010) Dalton Trans 39:3961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iler RK (1979) The chemistry of silica, solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kroger N, Deutzmann R, Sumper M (1999) Science 286:1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shimizu K, Cha JN, Stucky GD, Morse DE (1998) Proc Nat’l Acad Sci USA 95:6234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cha JN, Shimizu K, Zhou Y, Christiansen SC, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD, Morse DE (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tacke R, Linoh H, Stumpf B, Abraham W, Kieslich K, Ernst L (1983) Zeit für Natur 38:616Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frampton MB, Zelisko PM (2009) Silicon 1:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schröder HC, Krasko A, Brandt D, Wiens M, Nawaz Tahir M, Tremel W, Müller WEG (2007) Porifera Research: Biodiversity Innovation and Sustainability 581Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zelisko PM, Dudding T, Arnelien KR, Stanisic H (2010) Trypsin-catalyzed cross-linking of α,ω-triethoxysilyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane: An experimental and computational approach. In Clarson SJ, Owen MJ, Smith SD, Van Dyke ME (eds) Advance in silicones and silicone-modified materials. Chapter 5, 47–57, American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou Y, Shimizu K, Cha JN, Stucky GD, Morse DE (1998) Angew Chem Int Ed 38:780Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taglieber A, Höbenreich H, Carballeira JD, Mondière RJG, Reetz MT (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:8597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brinker CJ, Scherer GW (1991) Sol-gel science and technology, the chemistry and physics of sol-gel processing. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belton DJ, Patwardhan SV, Annenkov VA, Danilovtseva EN, Perry CC (2008) Proc Nat’l Acad Sci USA 105:5963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Annenkov VA, Patwardhan SV, Belton DJ, Danilovtseva EN, Perry CC (2006) Chem Commun 1521Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patwardhan SV, Mukerjee N, Steinitz-Kannan M, Clarson SJ (2003) Chem Commun 1123Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Artaki I, Bradley M, Zerda TW, Jonas J (1985) J Phys Chem 89:4399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knight CTG, Balec RJ, Kinrade SD (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:8148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dong H, Lee M, Thomas RD, Zhang Z, Reidy RF, Meuller DW (2003) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 28:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fruton JS (1974) Acc Chem Res 7:241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poojari Y, Palsule A, Clarson SJ, Gross RA (2008) Eur J Polym Chem 44:3080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Voet D, Voet JG (1990) Biochemistry 3rd Edition (2005). Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hung SH, Hedstrom L (1998) Prot Eng 11:669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer J (2002) Biochemistry, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eaborn C (1960) Organosilicon compounds. Butterworths Scientific, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brook MA (2000) Silicon in organic, organometallic, and polymer chemistry. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Centre for BiotechnologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations