Interventions to improve the mechanical ventilation fidelity of the Laerdal SimMan® 3G simulation mannequin

  • Neil J. Mehta
  • Renee Latoures
  • Martin M. Stechert
  • Richard L. Fidler
  • Jan Hirsch


Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors to disclose.


There are no other associations to disclose.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.


There are no external funding sources to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Haenel JB, Johnson JL. Mechanical Ventilation in Critical Illness. In: Duke J (Ed.). Anesthesia Secrets, 4th ed. Mosby; 2011: 149-16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meurling L, Hedman L, Lidefelt KJ, Escher C, Fellander-Tsai L, Wallin CJ. Comparison of high- and low equipment fidelity during paediatric simulation team training: a case control study. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hess DR. Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care 2014; 59: 1773-94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henderson WR, Sheel AW. Pulmonary mechanics during mechanical ventilation. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012; 180: 162-72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simulation Center and Anesthesia ServiceSan Francisco VA Medical Center and University of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations