Advertisement

Evaluation of a Multi-robot Cafe Based on Service Quality Dimensions

  • Takeshi MoritaEmail author
  • Naho Kashiwagi
  • Ayanori Yorozu
  • Hideo Suzuki
  • Takahira Yamaguchi
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

While AI applications are popular in many domains, they should work harmoniously with domain exerts and end users. Furthermore, to develop such harmonious AI applications, we need agile AI platforms for not only developers, but also domain experts. Currently, we have developed PRactical INTElligent aPplicationS (PRINTEPS), which is a user-centric platform to develop integrated intelligent applications. This paper reports on a multi-robot cafe as a practical application of PRINTEPS and evaluates its service quality at a university festival. It is not clear if robotic services are perceived as attractive and/or valuable, and how the concept of robotic services could lead to customer satisfaction. Therefore, the evaluation of the quality of such services is necessary to identify the key factors that could contribute to improving customer satisfaction. The purpose of this research is to identify key factors in improving customer satisfaction in robotic services by evaluating the service quality of the multi-robot cafe. We designed questionnaire items based on SERVQUAL which is one of the service quality evaluation measurement methods and conducted a questionnaire survey at a multi-robot cafe held at a university festival. From the collected data, we modeled and evaluated the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction to identify key factors in robotic services using a Bayesian network. In addition, the experiment confirms the usefulness of PRINTEPS.

Keywords

PRINTEPS multi-robot cafe service quality SERVQUAL 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Hideo Saito, Dr. Yuko Ozasa, and Mr. Toshiki Kikuchi for implementing the image processing modules, to Mr. Kodai Nakamura for implementing the knowledge modules, to Prof. Yukiko Nakano, Dr. Fumio Nihei, and Mr. Jie Zeng for implementing the spoken dialog system, and to Prof. Masaki Takahashi, Mr. Jun Kurosu, and Mr. Yosuke Kawasaki for implementing the motion management modules. This study was supported by the Project of “A Framework PRINTEPS to Develop Practical Artificial Intelligence,” (JPMJCR14E3) the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).

References

  1. 1.
    Choi, D., Ha, J., Jung, M., Park, W., & Park, H. (2015). Development of robot scenario script language and tool for non-expert. Journal of Automation and Control Engineering, 3(6), 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Datta, C., Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I. H., & MacDonald, B. A. (2012). RoboStudio—A visual programming environment for rapid authoring and customization of complex services on a personal service robot. Madrid: IROS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eksiri, A., & Kimura, T. (2015). Restaurant service robots development in Thailand and their real environment evaluation. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 27, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertzberg, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Rockel, S., Neumann, B., Lehmann, J., et al. (2014). The race project. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 28(4), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, M., Lee, H., Lee, J., Kwak, S.S., & Joo, Y. (2015). Effectiveness and service quality of robot museum through visitors experience: A case study of RoboLife Museum in South Korea. In 2015 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS) (pp 1–5).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.2015.7438289
  8. 8.
    Kim, Y., & Seok Lee, H. (2014). Quality, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, and intention to use: An empirical study of ubiquitous personal robot service. Asian Social Science, 10, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1, 172–198.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690910971445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mei Lau, M., Cheung, R., Y C Lam, A., & Ting Chu, Y. (2013). Measuring service quality in the banking industry: A Hong Kong based study. Contemporary Management Research, 9(3), 263–282.  https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.11060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morita, T., Nakamura, K., Komatsushiro, H., & Yamaguchi, T. (2018). PRINTEPS: An integrated intelligent application development platform based on stream reasoning and ROS. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 12(1), 71–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-018-0020-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of the service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pot, E., Monceaux, J., Gelin, R., & Maisonnier, B. (2009). Choregraphe: a graphical tool for humanoid robot programming. In RO-MAN 2009—The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE (pp 46–51).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326209.
  14. 14.
    Reichheld, F. F., & Teal, T. (1996). The loyalty effect: The hidden force behind growth, profits, and lasting value/Frederick F. Reichheld with Thomas Teal. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press Boston.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tenorth, M., & Beetz, M. (2013). KnowRob: A knowledge processing infrastructure for cognition-enabled robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(5), 566–590.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913481635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waibel, M., Beetz, M., D’Andrea, R., Janssen, R., Tenorth, M., Civera, J., et al. (2011). RoboEarth—A World Wide Web for robots. Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(2), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walch, M., & Karagiannis, D. (2019). How to connect design thinking and cyber-physical systems: the s*IoT conceptual modelling approach. In 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2019. http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/5848/. Accessed 26 Aug 2019.
  18. 18.
    Yamaguchi, T. (2015). A Platform PRINTEPS to Develop Practical Intelligent Applications. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp 919–920). Osaka, Japan: ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2815383.
  19. 19.
    Zander, S., Heppner, G., Neugschwandtner, G., Awad, R., Essinger, M., & Ahmed, N. (2016). A Model-Driven Engineering Approach for ROS using Ontological Semantics. CoRR cs. RO. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03998.

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations