Advertisement

Der Freie Zahnarzt

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 70–73 | Cite as

Leistungsvermögen unterschiedlicher Adhäsive im Milchgebiss

  • Roland FrankenbergerEmail author
  • Vera E. Hartmann
  • Matthias J. Roggendorf
  • Michael Krech
  • Andreas Braun
  • Norbert Kramer
Fortbildung
  • 2 Downloads

Die Adhäsivtechnik ist auch in der Kinderzahnmedizin ein übliches Verfahren. Allerdings unterscheiden sich die mikromorphologischen Strukturen des Milchzahnschmelzes und -dentins von denen bleibender Zähne. Kenntnisse der Schmelz- und Dentinhaftung im Milchgebiss sind notwendig, um die erzielbare Randqualität beurteilen zu können.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Momeni A, Hartmann T, Born C et al (2007) Association of caries experience in adolescents with different preventive measures. Int J Public Health 52:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS et al (2006) Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J Dent 34:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E et al (2005) Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 18:198–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM (2001) Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 23:481–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    el-Kalla IH (1999) Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. Am J Dent 12:37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Lewinstein I (2002) Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique. ASDC J Dent Child 69:239–242, 233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gwinnett AJ, Garcia-Godoy F (1992) Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent 5:237–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hosoya Y (1991) The effect of acid etching times on ground primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 15:188–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peutzfeldt A, Nielsen LA (2004) Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel: phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. Pediatr Dent 26:240–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA (1996) Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 75:1396–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA (1997) Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 19:246–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osorio R, Aguilera FS, Otero PR et al (2010) Primary dentin etching time, bond strength and ultra-structure characterization of dentin surfaces. J Dent 38:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sardella TN, de Castro FL, Sanabe ME, Hebling J (2005) Shortening of primary dentin etching time and its implication on bond strength. J Dent 33:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosoya Y, Goto G (1990) Effects of cleaning, polishing pretreatments and acid etching times on unground primary enamel. J Pedod 14:84–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hosoya Y, Goto G (1992) Resin adhesion to the ground primary enamel: influence of etching times and thermal cycling test. J Clin Pediatr Dent 17:25–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knoll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolff M (1985) Should primary enamel be ground prior to bonding? J Clin Orthod 19:137–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramires-Romito AC, Reis A, Loguercio AD et al (2004) Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesive systems applied on occlusal primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 28:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tandon S, Kumari R, Udupa S (1989) The effect of etch-time on the bond strength of a sealant and on the etch-pattern in primary and permanent enamel: an evaluation. ASDC J Dent Child 56:186–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F et al (2007) In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 86:529–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Tay FR (2005) Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res 84:741–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, de Souza Costa CA et al (2010) Chlorhexidine increases the longevity of in vivo resin-dentin bonds. Eur J Oral Sci 118:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Frankenberger
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Vera E. Hartmann
    • 1
  • Matthias J. Roggendorf
    • 1
  • Michael Krech
    • 1
  • Andreas Braun
    • 1
  • Norbert Kramer
    • 2
  1. 1.MarburgDeutschland
  2. 2.GießenDeutschland
  3. 3.Abteilung für Zahnerhaltungskunde, Medizinisches Zentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und KieferheilkundePhilipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort MarburgMarburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations