Investigation of the stable and the metastable liquidus miscibility gaps in Fe–Sn and Fe–Cu binary systems

  • Jiang-tao Gao
  • Chang-rong LiEmail author
  • Cui-ping Guo
  • Zhen-min Du


Two kinds of experimental methods were tried in the present work: (i) the powder metallurgy method combined with differential thermal analysis (DTA) to determine the metastable liquidus miscibility gap for a Fe–Cu binary system and (ii) the high-temperature melting method combined with isothermal treatment to determine the stable liquidus miscibility gap for a Fe–Sn binary system. The experimental method was adopted according to the characteristics of the liquidus miscibility gap of the specific system. Using the powder metallurgy method, a uniform microstructure morphology and chemical composition was obtained in the DTA specimen, and the phase-separation temperature of the supercooled metastable liquid was measured. The isothermal treatment was applied for the samples inside the stable liquidus miscibility gap; here, equilibrated compositions were reached, and a layered morphology was formed after rapid cooling. The liquid miscibility gaps of the Fe–Cu and Fe–Sn binary systems were measured, and the peak temperatures of the corresponding miscibility gaps were determined to be about 1417°C at x(Cu) = 0.465at% and 1350°C at x(Sn) = 0.487at%, respectively. On the basis of the experimental results, both the Fe–Cu and the Fe–Sn binary systems were thermodynamically assessed.


binary systems miscibility gap differential thermal analysis (DTA) metastable state 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0701201) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51271027). Special thanks are given to the Thermo-Calc software from Thermo-Calc AB, Sweden and Pandat program licensed from The CompuThermo LLC, USA.


  1. [1]
    J.E. Morral and S.L. Chen, High entropy alloys, miscibility gaps and the rose geometry, J. Phase Equilib. Diff., 38(2017), No. 3, p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    MSI Eureka phase diagram database,
  3. [3]
    S.P. Elder, A. Munits, and G.J. Abashian, Metastable liquid immiscibility in Fe–Cu and Co–Cu alloys, Mater. Sci. Forum, 50(1989), p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.E. Amara, A. Belhadj, R. Kesri and S. Hamar-Thibault, Stable and metastable equilibria in the binary Fe–Cu and ternary Fe–Cu–C system, Z. Metallkd., 90(1999), p. 116.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Wilde and J.H. Perepezko, Critical-point wetting at the metastable chemical bimodal in undercooled Fe–Cu alloys, Acta Mater., 47(1999), No. 10, p. 3009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. Nakagawa, Liquid immiscibility in copper–iron and copper–cobalt systems in the supercooled state, Acta Metall., 6(1958), No. 11, p. 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Shubhank and Y.B. Kang, Critical evaluation and thermodynamic optimization of Fe–Cu, Cu–C, Fe–C binary systems and Fe–Cu–C ternary system, Calphad, 45(2014), p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y.J. Liu, Y. Ge, and D. Yu. Thermodynamic descriptions for Au–Fe and Na–Zn binary systems, J. Alloys Compd., 476(2009), No. 1–2, p. 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, and K. Ishida, Formation of immiscible alloy powders with egg-type microstructure, Science, 297(2002), No. 5583, p. 990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K.C.H. Kumar, P. Wollants, and L. Delaey, Thermodynamic evaluation of Fe–Sn phase diagram, Calphad, 20(1996), No. 2, p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    X.W. Zuo, E.G. Wang, H. Han, L. Zhang, and J.C. He, Magnetic properties of Fe–49%Sn monotectic alloys solidified under a high magnetic field, J. Alloys Compd., 492(2010), No. 1–2, p. 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y.H. Wu, W.L. Wang, Z.C. Xia, and B. Wei, Phase separation and microstructure evolution of ternary Fe–Sn–Ge immiscible alloy under microgravity condition, Comput. Mater. Sci., 103(2015), p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    W.Q. Lu, S.G. Zhang, and J.G. Li, Depressing liquid phase separation and macrosegeregation of Fe–Sn immiscible alloys by Cu alloying, Mater. Sci. Technol., 30(2014), No. 2, p. 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.A. Turchanin, P.G. Agraval, and I.V. Nikolaenko, Thermodynamics of alloys and phase equilibria in the copper-iron system, J. Phase Equilib., 24(2003), No. 4, p. 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J.D. Verhoeven, S.C. Chueh, and E.D. Gibson, Strength and conductivity of in situ Cu–Fe alloys, J. Mater. Sci., 24(1989), No. 5, p. 1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. He, J.Z. Zhao, and L. Ratke, Solidification microstructure and dynamics of metastable phase transformation in undercooled liquid Cu–Fe alloys, Acta. Mater., 54(2006), No. 7, p. 1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Liu, L. Feng, Z. Chen, G.C. Yang, C.L. Yang, and Y.H. Zhou, Liquid-phase separation in rapid solidification of undercooled Fe–Co–Cu melts, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 28(2012), No. 7, p. 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    X.Y. Lu, C.D. Cao, and B. Wei, Microstructure evolution of undercooled iron–copper hypoperitectic alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 313(2001), No. 1–2, p. 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A.N. Campbell, J.H. Wood, and G.B. Skinner, The system iron–tin: liquidus only, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71(1949), No. 5, p. 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    K.C. Mills and E.T. Turkdogan, Liquid miscibility gap in iron–tin system, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 230(1964), No. 5, p. 1202.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. Nunoue and E. Kato, Mass spectrometric determination of the miscibility gap in the liquid Fe–Sn system and the activities of this system at 1550°C and 1600°C, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 73(1987), No. 7, p. 868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Z.A. Munir, U. Anselmi-Tamburini, and M. Ohyanagi, The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: A review of the spark plasma sintering method, J. Mater. Sci., 41(2006), No. 3, p. 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    H. Xu, J.H. Chen, S.B. Ren, X.B. He, and X.H. Qu, Sintering behavior and thermal conductivity of nickel-coated graphite flake/copper composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 25(2018), No. 4, p. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Science and Technology Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiang-tao Gao
    • 1
  • Chang-rong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cui-ping Guo
    • 1
  • Zhen-min Du
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations