Current Breast Cancer Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 211–218

Involving Patients in Their Care

  • Vikki A. Entwistle
  • Rebecca C. H. Brown
  • Heather M. Morgan
  • Zoë C. Skea
Psycho-Oncology and Supportive Care (P Butow, Section Editor)

Abstract

There has been growing interest internationally in how health services might more actively involve—and support the involvement of—patients in deciding about their treatments and in the delivery of their own care. Patient involvement can take diverse forms, and can be valued for a range of reasons. There has been a strong tendency for policies and service development initiatives to emphasize the need for health professionals to communicate to inform patients’ choice-making and to encourage patients to make particular practical contributions to their care. Recent studies of patients’ experiences, however, particularly in the context of breast cancer, have highlighted the additional significance of the relational aspects of involvement and the social factors (including those operating within healthcare settings) that influence patients’ potential to contribute. Further research and debate is needed to illuminate the ethical as well as the practical aspects of involving patients in their care.

Keywords

Patient participation Breast cancer Treatment decision-making Shared decision-making Professional-patient relations Patient activation Self-management 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:268–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee EO, Emmanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Härter M, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G. Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision-making: an international perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundh Wesen. 2011;105:229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alambuya RN, Ali S, Apostolidis K, et al. Salzburg statement on shared decision-making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, de Wit MPT. Shared decision-making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;354:e256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King E, Taylor J, Williams R, et al. The MAGIC programme evaluation. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.•
    Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Int Med. 2012;27:1361–7. A summary for clinicians that outlines 3 key steps in shared decision making.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O'Connor AM, Légaré F, Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003;327:736.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lux MP, Bayer CM, Loehberg CR, et al. Shared decision-making in meta-static breast cancer: discrepancy between the expected prolongation of life and treatment efficacy between patients and physicians, and influencing factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:429–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thiel FC, Schrauder MG, Fasching PA, et al. Shared decision-making in breast cancer: discrepancy between the treatment efficacy required by patients and by physicians. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:811–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fowler Jr FJ, Gallagher PM, Drake KM, et al. Decision dissonance: evaluating an approach to measuring the quality of surgical decision-making. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:136–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, et al. Establishing the effectiveness of decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13(Suppl2):S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz SJ, Morrow M. The challenge of individualizing treatments for patients with breast cancer. JAMA. 2012;307:1379–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.•
    Brown R, Butow P, Wilson-Genderson M, et al. Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:857–62. An international study showing that people’s preferences for involvement can shift during consultations and that people who are at least as involved as they prefer have better decision-related outcomes.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Au A, Lam W, Chan M, et al. Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for use among Chinese women facing breast cancer surgery. Health Expect. 2011;14:405–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peate M, Meiser B, Cheah B, et al. Making hard choices easier: a prospective multicentre study to assess the efficacy of a fertility-related decision aid in young women with early stage breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1053–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patient decision aids (Ottawa Health Research Institute), Available at: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
  19. 19.
    Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, et al. Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Butow P, et al. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective: a critical review of evidence and theory? BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13(Suppl2):S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shaffer VA, Tomek S, Hulsey L. The effect of narrative information in a publicly available patient decision aid for early-stage breast cancer. Health Commun. 2014;29:64–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elwyn G, Caldron L, Rosenkranz K, et al. Breast cancer surgery option grid, 2013. Available at: http://www.optiongrid.org/resources/breastcancersurgery_grid_USA.pdf.
  23. 23.
    Jibaja-Weiss M, Volk R, Granchi T, Neff N, Robinson E, Spann S, et al. Entertainment education for breast cancer surgery decisions: a randomized trial among patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:41–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.•
    Volk R, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, et al. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S1. An overview of a major international effort to develop evidence-based standards for decision support materials for patients.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, et al. Many miles to go…” a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, et al. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes? Psychooncology. 2012;21:1265–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision-making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;5:CD006732. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Entwistle VA, Cribb A. Enabling people to live well: fresh thinking about collaborative approaches to care for people with long term conditions. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Politi MC, Dizon DS, Frosch DL, et al. Importance of clarifying patients’ desired role in shared decision-making to match their level of engagement with their preferences. BMJ. 2013;347:f7066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cribb A, Entwistle VA. Shared decision-making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptions. Health Expect. 2011;14:210–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Donetto S, Cribb A. Researching involvement in health care practices: interrupting or reproducing medicalization? J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:907–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:291–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KA, et al. Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labelled ‘difficult’ among key obstacles to shared decision-making. Health Aff. 2012;31:1030–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Entwistle VA, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis J. Involvement in decision-making: a qualitative investigation of its meaning for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:362–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Entwistle VA, Cribb A, Watt IS. Shared decision making: enhancing clinical relevance. J R Soc Med. 2012;105:416–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pieters HC, Heilemann MV, Maliski S, et al. Instrumental relating and treatment decision-making among older women with early stage breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;39:E10–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sinding C, Hudak P, Wiernikowski J, et al. I like to be an informed person but…” negotiating responsibility for treatment decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1094–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    O’Brien MA, Charles C, Whelan TJ, et al. Women’s perceptions of their involvement in treatment decision-making for early stage breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:1717–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    O’Brien MA, Ellis PM, Whelan TJ, et al. Physician related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients. Health Expect. 2011;16:373–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, et al. The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:904–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.•
    Swainston K, Campbell C, van Wersche, et al. Treatment decision-making in breast cancer: a longitudinal exploration of women’s experiences. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17:155–70. A recent example of a qualitative study illustrating women’s appreciation of treatment recommendations from multidisciplinary teams when these are given with explanations and scope for discussion.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pass M, Belkora J, Moore D, et al. Patient and observer ratings of physician shared decision-making behaviours in breast cancer consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88:93–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Epstein RM, Street Jr RL. Shared mind: communication, decision making and autonomy in serious illness. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:454–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith A, Juraskova I, Butow P, et al. Sharing vs caring: the relative impact of sharing decisions versus managing emotions on patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:233–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery KM. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinical relationships. J Gen Int Med. 2010;25:741–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Anderson RT, et al. Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters. Implement. 2014;9:26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Frongillo M, Feibelmann S, Belkora J, et al. Is there shared decision-making when the provider makes a recommendation? Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:69–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sarradon-Eck A, Pellegrini I, Largillier R, et al. Self-management strategies adopted by breast cancer survivors to improve their adherence to tamoxifen. Breast J. 2012;18:389–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spichiger E, Rieder E, Muller-Frohlich C, et al. Fatigue in patients undergoing chemotherapy, their self-care and the role of health professional: a qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:165–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Speck RM, DeMichele A, Farrar JT, et al. Scope of symptoms and self-management strategies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:2433–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ridner SH, Bonner CM, Deng J, et al. Voices from the shadows: living with lymphedema. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35:E18–26.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thewes B, Bell ML, Butow P. Fear of cancer recurrence in early-stage breast cancer survivors: the role of metacognitive style and disease related factors. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2059–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brennan ME, Butow P, Marven M, et al. Survivorship care after breast cancer treatment–experiences and preferences of Australian women. Breast. 2011;20:271–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Adirim T, Chafranskaia A, Nyhof-Young J. Investigating the impact of socioeconomic status on the effectiveness of a pamphlet on achieving and maintaining bone health in breast cancer survivors: a patient education resource development primer. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27:54–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Patel RA, Klasnja P, Hartzler A, et al. Probing the benefits of real-time tracking during cancer care. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2012;1340–9.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Van den Berg SW, Gielissen MFM, Ottevanger PB, et al. Rationale of the BREAst cancer e-healTH [BREATH] multicentre randomised controlled trial: an internet-based self-management intervention to foster adjustment after curative breast cancer by decreasing distress and increasing empowerment. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:394.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.•
    Ruland CM, Maffei RM, Borosund E, et al. Evaluation of an eHealth application for personalized illness management support: cancer patients’ use and appraisal of usefulness. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:593–603. A description and initial evaluation of a comprehensive intervention to support women’s ongoing management of their symptoms.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ruland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, et al. Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36:6–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Int Med. 2012;27:520–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Easton P, Entwistle VA, Williams B. How the stigma of low literacy can impair patient-professional interactions and affect health: insights from a qualitative investigation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:319.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McLay JS, Stewart D, George J, et al. Complementary and alternative medicines use by Scottish women with breast cancer. What, why and the potential for drug interactions? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:811–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ernst E. Alternative treatments for breast cancer. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:453–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yeom HE, Heidrich SM. Relationships between three beliefs as barriers to symptom management and quality of life in older breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40:E108–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Clayton J, Natalia C, Butow P, et al. Physician endorsement alone may not enhance question-asking by advanced cancer patients during consultations about palliative care. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:1457–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dimoska A, Butow PN, Lynch J, et al. Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86:252–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Walczak A, Mazer B, Butow P, et al. A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: development and cross-cultural evaluation. Palliat Med. 2013;27:779–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Spiegle G, Al-Sukhni E, Schmocker S, et al. Patient decision aids for cancer treatment: are there any alternatives? Cancer. 2013;119:189–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Eggly S, Tkatch R, Penner LA, et al. Development of a question prompt list as a communication intervention to reduce racial disparities in cancer treatment. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28:282–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fouquet C, Bredart A, Boueuc C. French adaptation of a question prompt list for cancer patients and their careers in supportive and palliative care. Bull Cancer. 2012;99:693–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.•
    Sinding C, Miller P, Hudak P, et al. Of time and troubles: patient involvement and the production of health care disparities. Health. 2011;16:400–17. A careful qualitative investigation that highlights the social and material resources patients need to engage effectively in the management of their care.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Entwistle VA, Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: a qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Doherty C, Stavropoulou C. Patients’ willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:257–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hrisos S, Thomson R. Seeing it from both sides: do approaches to involving patients in improving their safety risk damaging the trust between patients and healthcare professionals? An interview study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80759.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vikki A. Entwistle
    • 1
  • Rebecca C. H. Brown
    • 1
  • Heather M. Morgan
    • 1
  • Zoë C. Skea
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Services Research Unit (HSRU)University of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations