Insufficient Protein Intake is Highly Prevalent among Physically Active Elderly
Sufficient protein intake and habitual physical activity are key factors in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. In the present study, we assessed habitual dietary protein intake and the contribution of animal proteins in male versus female physically active elderly and identified determinants of protein intake.
a cross-sectional study.
the study was performed within the Nijmegen Exercise Study.
physically active elderly ≥ 65 yrs.
Physical activity was assessed using the SQUASH questionnaire and expressed in Metabolic Equivalent of Task hours per week (METhr/wk). Dietary protein intake was determined using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine whether age, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol intake and physical activity were associated with protein intake (g/kg/d).
A total of 910 participants (70±4 yrs, 70% male) were included and reported a habitual physical activity level of 85.0±53.5 METhr/wk. Protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg/d with 57% animal-based proteins for males, and 1.2±0.3 g/kg/d with 59% animalbased proteins for females (both P<0.05). In total, 16%, 42% and 67% of the male elderly and 10%, 34% and 56% of the female elderly did not meet the recommended protein intake of 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 g/kg/d, respectively. Female sex (β=0.055, P=0.036) and more physical activity (β=0.001, P=0.001) were associated with a higher daily protein intake (g/kg/d).
The majority of physically active elderly and in particular males (i.e. 67%) does not reach a protein intake of 1.2 g/kg/d, which may offset the health benefits of an active lifestyle on muscle synthesis and prevention of sarcopenia. Intervention studies are warranted to assess whether protein supplementation may enhance muscle mass and strength in physically active elderly.
Key wordsProtein physical activity elderly active ageing sarcopenia
- 2.Houston DK, Nicklas BJ, Ding J, Harris TB, Tylavsky FA, Newman AB, et al. Dietary protein intake is associated with lean mass change in older, community-dwelling adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008;87(1):150–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Volpi E, Campbell WW, Dwyer JT, Johnson MA, Jensen GL, Morley JE, et al. Is the optimal level of protein intake for older adults greater than the recommended dietary allowance? The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2013;68(6):677–81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.(World Health Organization. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: Report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. Geneva:WHO Press; 2007. Report 935.).Google Scholar
- 7.Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, Cesari M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Morley JE, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2013;14(8):542–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423–34. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders: journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2000;24(9):1119–30.Google Scholar
- 18.Timmerman KL, Dhanani S, Glynn EL, Fry CS, Drummond MJ, Jennings K, et al. A moderate acute increase in physical activity enhances nutritive flow and the muscle protein anabolic response to mixed nutrient intake in older adults. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2012;95(6):1403–12. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.020800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Trijsburg L, de Vries JH, Boshuizen HC, Hulshof PJ, Hollman PC, van ‘t Veer P, et al. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake. The British journal of nutrition. 2015;114(8):1304–12. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515002871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar