Advertisement

The journal of nutrition, health & aging

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 880–884 | Cite as

Initial Validation of the Toulouse St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment in Older Adults

  • John E. Rouck
  • T. K. Malmstrom
  • J. E. Morley
Article

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Falls are one of the most prevalent health issues facing older adults. This study examines the validity of the Toulouse-St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment (TSLUMFA). Objectives were to validate the TSLUMFA by testing if it differentiates between prior non fallers (n=80) and fallers (n=23), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the gold standard Tinetti Gait and Balance Instrument (TGBI). Examine if the subset of FRAIL Scale items on the TSLUMFA distinguishes between previous non fallers (n=75) and fallers (n=20), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the TGBI. Identify TSLUMFA cut offs scores for fall risk.

Design

Prospective validation study.

Setting

Participants were ambulatory patients presenting to the SLU Geriatrics Clinic.

Participants

103 ambulatory older adults.

Measurements

Fall risk was assessed using the three assessments. Outcome measures were previous falls and follow up falls.

Results

TSLUMFA, FRAIL, and TGBI differentiated between previous fallers and non fallers. A TSLUMFA score <23 stratified patients as moderate risk (Sensitivity=0.806 Specificity=0.776) and a score <21 stratified patients as high risk (Sensitivity=0.929 Specificity=0.897). 78% of patients (n=80) participated in follow up and 20% (n=16) of these patients fell during follow up. TSLUMFA and TGBI absolute scores were lower among patients who fell during the follow up period versus non fallers but the observed differences were not statistically significant (TSLUMFA P=0.123 and TGBI P=0.074).

Conclusion

This study validated the TSLUMFA and FRAIL. No test predicted falls with statistical significance (most likely due to the low follow up participation) but a positive trend was seen. Clinical recommendations from this study are to use the FRAIL as an initial fall screen and patients scoring > 3 should be analyzed by TSLUMFA. The TSLUMFA’s advantage is that it pinpoints areas that will directly benefit from therapy to reduce falls.

Key words

Falls FRAIL Tinetti balance 

References

  1. 1.
    Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age and Ageing. 2006;35:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stevens JA. Falls among older adults -risk factors and prevention strategies. J Safety Res. 2005;36(4):409–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker SP, Harvey A. Fall injuries in the elderly. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 1985;1(3):501–512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murphy J, Isaacs B. The post-fall syndrome. Gerontology. 1982;28(4):265–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vetter NJ, Ford D. Anxiety and depression scores in elderly fallers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 1989;4(3):159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liddle J, Gilleard C. The emotional consequences of falls for patients and their families. Age Ageing. 1994;23(Suppl 4):17.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliver D, Hopper A, Seed P. Do hospital fall prevention programs work? A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2000;48(12):1679–1689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME. The Cost and Frequency of Hospitalization for Fall-Related Injuries in Older Adults. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(7):1020–1023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi M, Hector M. Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):188 e113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cameron ID, Murray GR, Gillespie LD, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in nursing care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(1):CD005465.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morley JE, Rolland Y, Tolson D, Vellas B. Increasing awareness of the factors producing falls: the mini falls assessment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):87–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gokce Kutsal Y, Barak A, Atalay A, et al. Polypharmacy in the elderly: a multicenter study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(7):486–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Hofstee HM, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM, Lips P. Falls in the elderly: a prospective study of risk factors and risk profiles. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(11):1129–1136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Morley JE. A comparison of four frailty models. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):721–726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(7):601–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1986;34(2):119–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaught SL. Gait, balance, and fall prevention. Ochsner J. 2001;3(2):94–97.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Serdi and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Rouck
    • 1
    • 4
  • T. K. Malmstrom
    • 2
  • J. E. Morley
    • 3
  1. 1.Saint Louis University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Division of Geriatric MedicineSaint Louis University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Division of Geriatric MedicineSaint Louis University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Division of Geriatric MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations