Relative validity of a diet history questionnaire against a four-day weighed food record among older men in Australia: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP)
To evaluate the relative validity of the diet history questionnaire (DHQ) used in the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP) against a four-day weighed food record (4dWFR) as the reference method.
Design and measurements
Detailed DHQ followed by a 4dWFR were completed between July 2012 and October of 2013. Setting: Burwood, Canada Bay and Strathfield in Sydney, Australia.
Fifty six community- dwelling men aged 75 years and over (mean=79 years).
DHQ estimates of intakes were generally higher than estimates from 4dWFR. Differences between the two methods were generally less than 20% with the exception of ß-carotene (37%). Fixed and proportional biases were only present for retinol, ß-carotene, magnesium, phosphorus and percentage of energy from protein; however, 95% limits of agreement were in some cases wide. Pearson correlation coefficient of log-transformed unadjusted values ranged from 0.15 (zinc) to 0.70 (alcohol), and from 0.06 (iron) to 0.63 (thiamin) after energy-adjustment. Spearman’s correlation coefficients ranged from 0.16 (zinc) to 0.80 (alcohol) before energy adjustment, and from 0.15(zinc) to 0.81(alcohol) after energy adjustment.
Our findings suggest that the DHQ used in CHAMP to measure the nutritional intake of its participants is appropriate to this age group and provides reasonably similar results to the 4dWFR for the majority of nutrients analysed.
KeywordsValidity weighed food record diet history questionnaire elderly men
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Year Book Australia. Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012 [updated 21 January 201310/02/2014]; Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs.Google Scholar
- 3.Van Staveren WA, De Groot LC, Blauw YH, Van der Wielen RP. Assessing diets of elderly people: problems and approaches. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994;59(1):221S–3S.Google Scholar
- 8.Pedersen AN, Fagt S, Ovesen L, Schroll M. Quality control including validation in dietary surveys of elderly subjects. The validation of a dietary history method (the SENECA-method) used in the 1914-population study in Glostrup of Danish men and women aged 80 years. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2001;5(4):208–16.Google Scholar
- 9.Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 11.Bingham SA. The dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations 1987.Google Scholar
- 18.Burke BS. The dietary history as a tool in research. J Am Diet Assoc. 1947;23(12):1041–6.Google Scholar
- 19.Williams T. This=That: a life-size photo guide to food serves: revised and expanded 2013.Google Scholar
- 20.Henderson L, Gregory J, Swan G, Britain G, Britain G. The national diet & nutrition survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years: HM Stationery Office; 2002.Google Scholar
- 23.Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. International Journal of Obesity & Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2000;24(9):1119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Goldberg G, Black A, Jebb S, Cole T, Murgatroyd P, Coward W, et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1991;45(12):569–81.Google Scholar
- 26.AUSNUT2007—Australian Food, Supplement and Nutrient Database for Estimation of Population Nutrient Intakes. Canberra: Food Standards Australia New Zealand; [cited 2014 05/03/14]; Available from: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/ausnut2007/.Google Scholar
- 29.Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.Google Scholar
- 31.Wood SN. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R: Chapman and Hall/CRC.; 2006.Google Scholar
- 32.Hastie TJ TR. Generalized additive models. London: Chapman and Hall 1990.Google Scholar
- 39.Lassale C, Guilbert C, Keogh J, Syrette J, Lange K, Cox DN. Estimating food intakes in Australia: validation of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) food frequency questionnaire against weighed dietary intakes. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2009;22(6):559–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Martin Bland J. How can I decide the sample size for a study of agreement between two methods of measurement? [updated 12 january, 200406 march 2014]; Available from: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas/sizemeth.htm.Google Scholar