Construction of an integral formula of biological age for a healthy Chinese population using principle component analysis
- 199 Downloads
Whereas chronological age (CA) cannot distinguish functional differences among individuals of the same age, the biological age (BA) may be used to reflect the functional state of the body. The purpose of this study was to construct an integral formula of the BA, by using principle component analysis (PCA).
The vital organ function of 505 healthy individuals of Han origin (age 35–91 years) was examined. A total of 114 indicators of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and brain functions, and clinical, inflammatory, genetic, psychological, and life habit factors were assessed as candidate indicators of aging. Candidate indicators were submitted with CA to correlation and redundancy analyses. The PCA method was used to build an integral formula of the BA for the population.
Seven biomarkers were selected in accordance with a certain load standard. These biomarkers included the trail making test (TMT), pulse pressure (PP), mitral valve annulus ventricular septum of the peak velocity of early filling (MVES), minimum carotid artery intimalmedial thickness (IMTmin), maximum internal diameter of the carotid artery (Dmax), maximal midexpiratory flow rate 75/25 (MMEF75/25), and Cystatin C (CysC). The formula for the BA was: BA = 0.0685 (TMT) + 0.267 (PP)–1.375 (MVES) + 22.443 (IMTmin) + 2.962 (Dmax)–2.332 (MMEF75/25) + 16.104 (CysC) + 0.137 (CA) + 0.492.
Several genetic and lifestyle indicators were considered as candidate markers of aging. However, ultimately, only markers reflecting the function of the vital organs were included in the BA formula. This study represents a useful attempt to employ multiple indicators to build a comprehensive BA evaluation formula of aging populations.
Key wordsBiological age chronological age principal component analysis China healthy people
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? NATURE-LONDON 233–238.Google Scholar
- 6.Majkić-Singh N (2011) What is a Biomarker? From its Discovery to Clinical Application.Google Scholar
- 13.Ahammer IM, Baltes PB (1972) Objective versus perceived age differences in personality: how do adolescents, adults, and older people view themselves and each other? Journal of Gerontology.Google Scholar
- 14.Barak B, Schiffman LG (1981) Cognitive age: A nonchronological age variable. Advances in consumer research 8:602–606.Google Scholar
- 17.Grubb A, Björk J, Nyman U (2011) Cystatin C, a marker for successful aging and glomerular filtration rate, is not influenced by inflammation. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 71:145–149.Google Scholar
- 23.Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature 464:504–12.Google Scholar