The effectiveness of IDF and ATP-III in identifying metabolic syndrome and the usefulness of these tools for health-promotion in older Taiwanese
- 112 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of IDF (International Diabetes Federation) and ATP-III (National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III) for predicting metabolic syndrome, and to evaluate the usefulness of these definitions for health promotion.
A cross-sectional study.
A national random sample.
A population representative sample of 1021 54–91 year-old Taiwanese.
Subjects were measured for anthropometric and biochemical indicators and rated for the presence of metabolic syndrome using the two definitions. We evaluated the effectiveness of the two definitions in predicting MetS among those who had specific metabolic disorders. Results were analyzed with Student t-test and McNemar’s test.
Among the 918 subjects who had one or more MetS-item disorders, ATP-III rated greater proportions of subjects as having MetS than IDF, but both definitions predicted less than 50% (37.7% and 45.4%, respectively) as having MetS.
Compared to IDF, ATP-III rated a greater proportion of subjects as having MetS, but both definitions missed more than 50% of subjects who had metabolic disorder(s). Since those who are missed have as much need for lifestyle intervention, the definitions appear not appropriate for health promotion.
Key wordsMetabolic syndrome metabolic disorder health promotion Taiwan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Hermalin AL, Liang J, Chang MC. 1989 survey of the health and living status of the elderly in Taiwan: questionnaire and survey design. Comparative study of the elderly in Asia research report 89-1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.; 1989.Google Scholar
- 11.Tong PC, Kong AP, So WY, Yang X, Ho CS, Ma RC, et al. The usefulness of the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III definitions of the metabolic syndrome in predicting coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1206–1211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Moebus S, Hanisch JU, Aidelsburger P, Bramlage P, Wasem J, Jockel KH. Impact of 4 different definitions used for the assessment of the prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in primary healthcare: The German Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Project (GEMCAS). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007;6:22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Succurro E, Marini MA, Arturi F, Grembiale A, Fiorentino TV, Andreozzi F, et al. Usefulness of Hemoglobin A1c as a Criterion to Define the Metabolic Syndrome in a Cohort of Italian Nondiabetic White Subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2011(170):1650–1655.Google Scholar