Advertisement

The journal of nutrition, health & aging

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 213–218 | Cite as

Automatic video monitoring system for assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease symptoms

  • R. Romdhane
  • E. Mulin
  • A. Derreumeaux
  • N. Zouba
  • J. Piano
  • L. Lee
  • I. Leroi
  • P. Mallea
  • R. David
  • M. Thonnat
  • F. Bremond
  • P. H. RobertEmail author
JNHA: Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Abstract

In order to fully capture the complexity of the behavioural, functioning and cognitive disturbances in Alzheimer Disease (AD) and related disorders information and communication techniques (ICT), could be of interest. This article presents using 3 clinical cases the feasibility results of an automatic video monitoring system aiming to assess subjects involved in a clinical scenario.

Method and population

The study was conducted in an observation room equipped with everyday objects for use in activities of daily living. The overall aim of the clinical scenario was to enable the participants to undertake a set of daily tasks that could realistically be achieved in the setting of the observation room. The scenario was divided in three steps covering basic to more complex activities: (1) Directed activities, (2) Semi-directed activities, (3) Undirected (“free”) activities. The assessment of each participant of the study was done with an automatic video monitoring system composed of a vision component and an event recognition component. The feasibility study involved three participants: two AD patients and one elderly control participant.

Results

The first result of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility of this new assessment method from both the patient and the technical points of view. During the first step the control participant performed all these activities faster than the two AD participants. During the second step of the scenario AD participants were not able to follow the correct order of the tasks and even omitted some of them. Finally during the last step of the scenario devoted to free activities the control participant chose one of the proposed activities (reading) and undertook this activity for almost the entire duration. In contrast, the two AD participants had more difficulties choosing one of the suggested activities and were not able to undertake any one activity in a sustained manner.

Discussion

The automatic video monitoring system presented here analyzes human behaviours and looks for changes in activity through the detection of the presence of people and their movements in real time. Once the technique has been standardized, it could significantly enhance the assessment of AD patients in both clinical and clinical trial settings as well as providing further information regarding patient frailty that could enhance their safety and ease caregiver burden.

Key words

Alzheimer’s disease BPSD ICT 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clarkson B, Sawhney N, Pentland A. Auditory context awareness via wearable computing. In Proceedings of PUI’98: The Perceptual User Interfaces Workshop; 1998. p. 37–42.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore D, Essa I, Hayes M. Exploiting human actions and object context for recognition tasks. In Proceedings of ICCV99: The 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 1999. p. 80–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang S, et al., Common sense based joint training of human activity recognizers. In Proceedings of IJCAI 2007: The 20th IEEE International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2007. p. 2237–2242.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biswas J, et al., Sensor based micro context for mild dementia assistance. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foerster F, Fahrenberg J. Motion pattern and posture: correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2000. 32(3): p. 450–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Folstein, M.F., L.N. Robins, and J.E. Helzer, The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1983. 40(7): p. 812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummings, J.L., et al., The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 1994. 44(12): p. 2308–2314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert, P.H., et al., The apathy inventory: assessment of apathy and awareness in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2002. 17(12): p. 1099–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montgomery, S.A. and M. Asberg, A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry, 1979. 134: p. 382–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yesavage, J.A., et al., Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res, 1982. 17(1): p. 37–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katz, S., et al., Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist, 1970. 10(1): p. 20–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guralnik, J.M., et al., A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol, 1994. 49(2): p. M85–M94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Avanzi, et al., Design and assessment of an intelligent Activity Monitoring Platform. In EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, special issue in “Advanced in intelligent Vision Systems: Methods and Application”, 2005. 14: p. 2359–2374.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nordin, E., E. Rosendahl, and L. Lundin-Olsson, Timed “Up & Go” test: reliability in older people dependent in activities of daily living—focus on cognitive state. Phys Ther, 2006. 86(5): p. 646–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ries, J.D., et al., Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed “up & go” test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease. Phys Ther, 2009. 89(6): p. 569–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esposito, F., et al., Apathy and executive dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 24(2): p. 131–137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Serdi and Springer Verlag France 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Romdhane
    • 1
  • E. Mulin
    • 2
  • A. Derreumeaux
    • 2
  • N. Zouba
    • 1
  • J. Piano
    • 2
    • 3
  • L. Lee
    • 2
    • 3
  • I. Leroi
    • 4
  • P. Mallea
    • 5
  • R. David
    • 2
  • M. Thonnat
    • 1
  • F. Bremond
    • 1
  • P. H. Robert
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Pulsar teamINRIA, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueParisFrance
  2. 2.Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche, EA CoBTeKCHU de Nice, UNSANiceFrance
  3. 3.CIU-S Centre d’innovation et d’usage en SantéNiceFrance
  4. 4.Lancashire Care Foundation NHS Trust/University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  5. 5.CNR Centre National de Réference Santé à domicile et autonomieNiceFrance
  6. 6.Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de RechercheHôpital de CimiezNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations