The resource utilization in dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community-living patients with dementia
- First Online:
- 968 Downloads
Informal care is a significant component of the societal resource use and costs in dementia care. Thus it is fundamental that assessments of informal care are valid. Thus the aim was to analyse the validity of time estimates with the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument.
Prospective observational study.
Fourteen married and cohabiting patient-caregiver pairs.
Comparisons of estimates of caregiver time by recall with the RUD instrument, by diaries and by direct observation, with calculation of agreement statistics for recall vs. diary and recall vs. direct observation to assess accuracy of the time estimates derived from recall.
The patients and their caregivers participated in 47 diaries and 30 observation sessions. The agreement between diaries and recall estimates was high for personal ADL (intra-class correlation (ICC) 0.93), supervision (ICC 0.87) and total time (ICC 0.91) and lower but acceptable for instrumental ADL (ICC 0.75). Regarding observation vs recall estimates, the corresponding figures were for personal ADL (ICC 0.81), for instrumental ADL (ICC 0.74), for supervision (ICC 0.78) and for total time (ICC 0.80).
The RUD instrument appears to accurately estimate the amount of informal care provided by caregivers to dementia patients
Key wordsRUD resource utilization in dementia Alzheimer's disease economics validation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Wimo A. Cost of dementia. In: May M, Sartorius N, editors. Dementia WPA Series Evidence and experience in Psychiatry. London: John Wiley & Son; 2000. p. 335–363.Google Scholar
- 3.Wimo A, Wetterholm AL, Mastey V, Winblad B. Evaluation of the resource utilization and caregiver time in Anti-dementia drug trials — a quantitative battery. In: Wimo A, Jonsson B, Karlsson G, Winblad B, editors. The Health Economis of dementia. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1998. p. 465–499.Google Scholar
- 7.Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 2001. p. 200–224.Google Scholar
- 10.Coduras A, Rabasa I, Frank A, Bermejo-Pareja F, Lopez-Pousa S, Lopez-Arrieta JM, et al. Prospective one-year cost-of-illness study in a cohort of patients with dementia of Alzheimer's disease type in Spain: the ECO study. J Alzheimers Dis. Jan; 19(2):601–615.Google Scholar
- 14.Mesterton J, Wimo A, By A, Langworth S, Winblad B, Jonsson L. Cross Sectional Observational Study on the Societal Costs of Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2009 Nov 26.Google Scholar
- 15.Wimo A, Winblad B. Resource utilisation in dementia: RUD Lite. Brain Aging. 2003;3:48–59.Google Scholar