Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty
Most conceptual and operational definitions of frailty place heavy emphasis on the physical problems encountered by older people. The accompanying models are based largely on a medical model. An integral approach is almost never adopted. This study aims to develop both an integral operational definition of frailty and an integral conceptual model of frailty.
In order to achieve these aims, a thorough literature search was performed on components of operational definitions and models of frailty. In addition, experts (N=17) were consulted during two expert meetings.
There was consensus among the experts on the inclusion of the following components in the operational definition of frailty: strength, balance, nutrition, endurance, mobility, physical activity and cognition. Some respondents indicated that they would wish to add components from the psychological or social domain. Supported by results from the literature search, a new integral operational definition of frailty was developed. This operational definition lies at the heart of an integral conceptual working model of frailty. This model expresses the relationships between three domains of frailty, adverse outcomes such as disability and the determinants.
The model should be able to serve as a basis for further scientific research on frailty. The model also provides a framework for the development of a measurement instrument which can be used for the identification of frail elderly persons.
Key wordsFrailty elderly definition integral model expert meetings
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 15.Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar
- 17.Fawcett. Analysis and evaluation of conceptual models of nursing. 2nd edn. ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: F.A. Davis Company; 1989.Google Scholar
- 28.Imuta H, Yasumura S, Abe H, Fukao A. The prevalence and psychosocial characteristics of the frail elderly in Japan: a community-based study. Aging (Milano). 2001 Dec;13(6):443–453.Google Scholar
- 32.Bergman H, Béland F, Karunananthan S, Hummel S, Hogan D, Wolfson C. English translation of article published in ‘Gérontologie et société’. Dévelopment d’un cadre de travail pour comprendre et étudier la fragilité. Gérontologie et société. 2004;109:15–29.Google Scholar
- 39.Nourhashemi F, Andrieu S, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Vellas B, Albarede JL, Grandjean H. Instrumental activities of daily living as a potential marker of frailty: a study of 7364 community-dwelling elderly women (the EPIDOS study). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Jul;56(7):M448–M453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):991–1001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar