Comparison of hand dynamometers in elderly people
- 414 Downloads
Some dynamometers previously tested in healthy adults showed variable degrees of practicality, weight and ergonomics. More practical models could also be used as a more suitable tool in gerontological field and clinical studies. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the measurements and the performance of hand grip strength dynamometers in the elderly.
A retirement home and a social day care centre for old people in Porto, Portugal.
Participants and measurements
The accuracy of four static grip strength dynamometers (Smedlay’s® Hand, Sammons Preston Rolyan® Bulb, Eisenhut® and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand) was first tested in laboratory. The grip strength of fifty-five elderly individuals 65–99 years was measured with the four dynamometers and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand which was used as the comparison dynamometer.
The accuracy of the four dynamometers measurements compared to known forces was excellent (r > 0.96). A strong association between the measurements obtained by the Jamar® Hydraulic and the other instruments evaluated was found (r > 0.77) but significant differences between the mean hand grip strength values evaluated with the Jamar® Hydraulic and each one of the other dynamometers were found. The Bland and Altman plots confirmed that none of the three dynamometers reflects a good agreement with the Jamar® Hydraulic.
All four dynamometers showed excellent results regarding their laboratory tested accuracy. However, their application among elderly people rendered very different results. The Smedlay’s® results’ were closer to the Jamar® Hydraulic, though none of these three dynamometers produced comparable results to the Jamar® Hydraulic.
Key wordsHand grip strength dynamometers elderly Mini Nutritional Assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 11.Mathiowetz V, Vizenor L, Melander D. Comparison of baseline instruments to the Jamar dynamometer and the B&L engineering pinch gauge. Occup Ther J Res. 2000; 20:147–162.Google Scholar
- 14.Fike ML, Rousseu E. Measurement of adult hand strength: a comparison of 2 instruments. OccupTher J Res. 1982; 2:43–49.Google Scholar
- 15.Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chernier TC. Measurement of grip strength — validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and Jamar grip dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992; 16:216–219.Google Scholar
- 19.Fess EE. Grip Strength. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992.Google Scholar
- 21.Lee RD, Nieman DC. Nutritional Assessment, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Mosby; 1996.Google Scholar
- 23.Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini Nutritional Assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts and Research in Gerontology. 1994; 2Suppl:15–59.Google Scholar
- 24.Rubenstein LZ, Harker J, Guigoz Y and Vellas B. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and the MNA: An Overview of CGA, Nutritional Assessment, and Development of a Shortened Version of the MNA. In: “Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA): Research and Practice in the Elderly”. Vellas B, Garry PJ and Guigoz Y, editors. Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series. Clinical & Performance Programme, vol. 1. Karger, Basel 1999, pp101–116.Google Scholar
- 25.Nestlé Nutrition Institute, MNA® Elderly [homepage]. NNI [accessed in 2008 Jan03]. MNA® Forms, Portuguese. Available at: http://www.mnaelderly.com/forms/MNA_portuguese.pdf
- 32.Last J. A dictionary of epidemiology. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar