The effects of supplementation with creatine and protein on muscle strength following a traditional resistance training program in middle-aged and older men
Creatine and protein supplementation can enhance the training outcomes of young subjects, but it is not clear if there are benefits for older individuals. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of creatine and protein supplementation on strength gains following a traditional resistance training program for middle-aged and older men.
Design, Setting, Participants
This study assessed changes in strength of men aged 48–72 years following 14 weeks of resistance training supplemented with creatine and/or protein. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design placed 42 males into one of four groups: Resistance Trained Placebo (RTP, n=10); Resistance Trained Creatine (RTCr, 5g Cr, n=10); Resistance Trained Protein (RTPr, 35g whey Pr, n=11); or Resistance Trained Creatine and Protein (RTCrPr, 5g Cr and 35g Pr, n=11).
All groups trained 3 days per week for 14 weeks. The resistance training program was based on progressive overload. Training loads corresponded to 80% 1RM (one repetition maximum strength), 3 sets of 8 repetitions for the following exercises: knee extension/knee flexion; bicep curl/tricep extension; military press; lat pull down; seated leg press; and bench press.
1 RM for each exercise and measures of lean body mass were assessed prior to and following the 14 week program.
Each group significantly (p<0.05) increased strength and lean body mass, however, there were no significant group effects or group X trial interactions.
Resistance training in middle-aged and older men significantly increased muscular strength and added muscle mass with no additional benefits from creatine and/or protein supplementation.
Key wordsCreatine monohydrate whey protein weight training strength aging
- 1.Roubenoff R, Hughes V. Sarcopenia: Current Concepts. J Gerontol Medical Series A 2000: 55A: M716–M724.Google Scholar
- 6.Hartman J, Tang J, Wilkinson S, Tarnopolsky M, Lawrence R, Fullerton A, Phillips S. Consumption of fat-free fluid milk after resistance exercise promotes greater lean mass accretion than does consumption of soy or carbohydrate in young, novice, male weightlifters. Am J Clin Nutr 2007: 86(2): 373–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kerksick C, Rasmussen C, Lancaster S, Magu B, Smith P, Melton C, Greenwood M, Almada A, Earnest C, Kreider R. The effects of protein and amino acid supplementation on performance and training adaptations during ten weeks of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2006: 20(3): 643–653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Brose A, Parise G, Tarnopolsky M. Creatine supplementation enhances isometric strength and body composition improvements following strength exercise training in older adults. J Gerontol, Series A 2003: 58: B11–B19.Google Scholar
- 18.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ.Google Scholar
- 21.Wilder N, Gilders R, Haterman F. The effects of a 10 week, periodized, off-season resistance-training program and creatine supplementation among college football players. J Health res 2002:16(3): 343–352.Google Scholar
- 24.Stevenson S, Dudley G. Creatine loading, resistance exercise performance, and muscle mechanics. J Strength Cond Res 2002: 15(4): 413–419.Google Scholar
- 25.Esmarck B, Anderson J, Olsen S, Richter E, Mizuno M, Kiaer M. Timing of post exercise protein intake is important for muscle hypertrophy with resistance training in elderly humans. Am J Physiol 2001: 535(1): 301–311.Google Scholar
- 28.Earnest C, Snell P, Mitchell T, Rodriguez R, Almada A. Effect of creatine monohydrate ingestion on peak anaerobic power, capacity, and fatigue index. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1994: 26: S39.Google Scholar
- 39.Theodrou A, Havenetidis K, Zanker C, O’Hara J, King R, Hood C, Paradisis G, Cooke C. Effects of acute creatine loading with or without carbohydrate on repeated bouts of maximal swimming in high-performance swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 2005: 19(2): 265–269.Google Scholar