The SF-36: A simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies
- 184 Downloads
Mobility disability is a major problem in older people. Numerous scales exist for the measurement of disability but often these do not permit comparisons between study groups. The physical functioning (PF) domain of the established and widely used Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire asks about limitations on ten mobility activities.
To describe prevalence of mobility disability in an elderly population, investigate the validity of the SF-36 PF score as a measure of mobility disability, and to establish age and sex specific norms for the PF score.
We explored relationships between the SF-36 PF score and objectively measured physical performance variables among 349 men and 280 women, 59–72 years of age, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Normative data were derived from the Health Survey for England (HSE) 1996.
32% of men and 46% of women had at least some limitation in PF scale items. Poor SF-36 PF scores (lowest fifth of the gender-specific distribution) were related to: lower grip strength; longer timed-up-and-go, 3m walk, and chair rises test times in men and women; and lower quadriceps peak torque in women but not men. HSE normative data showed that median PF scores declined with increasing age in men and women.
Our results are consistent with the SF-36 PF score being a valid measure of mobility disability in epidemiological studies. This approach might be a first step towards enabling simple comparisons of prevalence of mobility disability between different studies of older people. The SF-36 PF score could usefully complement existing detailed schemes for classification of disability and it now requires validation against them.
Key wordsEpidemiology physical functioning disability ageing mobility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.International classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO Health Organisation, 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.Bond, J. and Carstairs, V. Services for the elderly. 1982. Scottish Home and Health Department. Scottish Health Service Studies.Google Scholar
- 8.Harwood RH, Ebrahim S and Kalache A; Locomotor Disability in The epidemiology of Old Age; London BMJ/WHO 1996: 378–388Google Scholar
- 10.Prescott-Clarke, P. and Primatesta, P. Health Survey for England’ 96. Vol I: Findings and Vol II: Methodology and Documentation. 1998. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
- 16.Syddall HE, Sayer AA, Dennison EM et al. Cohort Profile: The Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol 2005.Google Scholar
- 17.Sayer AA, Syddall HE, Gilbody HJ, et al. Does sarcopenia originate in early life? Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. J Gerontol 2004;59A:930–934.Google Scholar
- 19.Ware JE, Kosinski M, and Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 2000. Lincoln, RI, Quality Metric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 21.Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetic Books; 1988Google Scholar
- 22.Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, et al. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am] 1984; 9: 222–226.Google Scholar
- 23.Podsiadlo D and Richardson S. The timed “up & go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society 39:142–148, 1991.Google Scholar
- 25.E. J. Bassey, M. A. Fiatarone, E. F. O’Neill, et al. Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci (Lond) (3):321–327, 1992.Google Scholar
- 28.Joint Health Surveys Unit of Social and Community Planning Research and University College London, Health Survey for England, 1996 [computer file]. 3rd ed. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], 26 March 2001. SN: 3886.Google Scholar
- 30.Kuh D, Bassey EJ, Butterworth S, et al. Grip strength, postural control, and functional leg power in a representative cohort of British men and women: associations with physical activity, health status, and socioeconomic conditions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Feb;60(2):224–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Julious SA, George S, Campbell MJ. Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36). JECH 1995; 49: 642–644.Google Scholar