Genetic Variation of pln Loci Among Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Group Strains with Antioxidant and Cholesterol-Lowering Ability
- 228 Downloads
In the present study, 14 different plantaricin-encoding genes of pln loci were studied and compared to available sequences from public domain database of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Based upon the presence and absence of selected genes, pln locus was grouped into eight clusters. Further, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for seven genes has discriminated the complex pln locus into five types which includes WCFS1 (in Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum MCC 2976 and MCC 2974 and Lactobacillus paraplantarum MCC 2978), closely related to J51 (in Lb. paraplantarum MCC 2973 and MCC 2977), J23 (in Lb. plantarum MTCC 5422), NC8 (in Lb. paraplantarum MTCC 9483), and a new E1 type (in Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum E1). It was observed that the plnA, EF, NC8βα, NC81F, NC8HK, and G were expressed in E1 strain. Further, southern hybridization confirmed the chromosome-encoded plantaricin in Lb. plantarum group (LPG) strains. Several PCR assays and DNA sequence analysis of the regions amplified in pln loci of E1 isolate suggested a hybrid variant of NC8 and J51 plantaritypes. This indicates the wide distribution of plantaricin with remarkable variation, diversity, and plasticity among the LPG strains of vegetable origin. Further, the selected strains were able to reduce the growth of Kocuria rhizophila ATCC 9341 by 40–54% within 6 h of co-incubation under in vitro pathogen exclusion assay. These isolates also possessed cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant activity suggesting their application in the development of functional foods.
KeywordsLactobacillus plantarum Plantaricin Probiotic Pathogen exclusion Diversity Real-time PCR
We express our gratitude to the Director, CSIR-CFTRI, for encouragement and facilities. SMD extend her thanks to SERB-Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for endorsing the study under start-up grant scheme (Project No. SB/YS/LS-353/2013).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Zhang Z-Y, Lui C, Zhu Y-Z, Wei Y-X, Tian F (2012) Safety assessment of Lactobacillus plantarum JDM1 based on the complete genome. Int J Food Microbiol 153:116–170Google Scholar
- 6.Pisano MB, Patrignani F, Cosentino S, Guerzoni ME, Franz CMAP, Holzapfel WH (2011) Diversity and functional properties of Lactobacillus plantarum group strains isolated from Italian cheese products. Dairy Sci Technol 91:65–76Google Scholar
- 7.Huang C-H, Huang L, Wu C-P, Chang M-T (2016) Molecular discrimination of Lactobacillus plantarum group using comparative sequence analysis of the dnaJ gene and as a target for developing novel species-specific PCR primers. J Chinese Soc Ani Sci 45:45–55Google Scholar
- 9.Sabo SS, Vitolo M, Gonzalez JMD, de Souza Oliveira RP (2014) Overview of Lactobacillus plantarum as a promising bacteriocin producer among lactic acid bacteria. Food Res Int 64:27–536Google Scholar
- 14.Yadav R, Puniya AK, Shukla P (2016) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum RYPR1 from an indigenous fermented beverage Rabadi. Front Microbiol 7:1–9Google Scholar
- 15.Liu C, Pan T (2010) In vitro effects of lactic acid bacteria on cancer cell viability and antioxidant activity. J Food Drug Anal 18:77–86Google Scholar
- 17.Xiang J, Wang G, Zhang Q, Liu X, Gu Z, Zhang H, Chen YQ, Chen W (2015) Determining antioxidant activities of lactobacilli cell-free supernatants by cellular antioxidant assay: a comparison with traditional methods. PLoS One 10(3):1–16Google Scholar
- 25.Devi SM, Halami PM (2013) Detection of mobile genetic elements in pediocin PA-1 like producing lactic acid bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 52:1–7Google Scholar
- 32.Rudel LL, Morris MD (1973) Determination of cholesterol using Ophtaldealdehyde. J Lipid Res 14:364–366Google Scholar
- 33.Albright SC, Winston WL, Zappe C (1999) Data analysis and decision making with Microsoft Excel. The engineering economist: A journal devoted to the problems of capital investment. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove; 2001. 46(3):998. ISBN: 0-534-38932-5Google Scholar
- 39.Ben Omar N, Abriouel H, Keleke S, Sanchez Valenzuela A, Martinez-Canamero M, Lucas Lopez R, Ortega E, Galvez A (2008) Bacteriocin producing Lactobacillus strains isolated from poto poto, a Congolese fermented maize product, and genetic fingerprinting of their plantaricin operons. Int J Food Microbiol 30:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Kandi V, Palange P, Vaish R, Bhatti AB, Kale V, Kandi MR, Bhoomagiri MR (2016) Emerging bacterial infection: identification and clinical significance of Kocuria species. Cureus 8(8):1–6Google Scholar
- 42.Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Jones ML, Shah D, Jain P, Saha S, Prakash S (2014) Cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus probiotic bacteria: an in vitro investigation. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–9Google Scholar
- 45.Russo P, de Chiara MLV, Vernile A, Amodio ML, Arena MP, Capozzi V, Massa S, Spano G (2014) Fresh-cut pineapple as a new carrier of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–9Google Scholar