An OSSE Study for Deep Argo Array using the GFDL Ensemble Coupled Data Assimilation System
- 97 Downloads
An observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) using an ensemble coupled data assimilation system was designed to investigate the impact of deep ocean Argo profile assimilation in a biased numerical climate system. Based on the modern Argo observational array and an artificial extension to full depth, “observations” drawn from one coupled general circulation model (CM2.0) were assimilated into another model (CM2.1). Our results showed that coupled data assimilation with simultaneous atmospheric and oceanic constraints plays a significant role in preventing deep ocean drift. However, the extension of the Argo array to full depth did not significantly improve the quality of the oceanic climate estimation within the bias magnitude in the twin experiment. Even in the “identical” twin experiment for the deep Argo array from the same model (CM2.1) with the assimilation model, no significant changes were shown in the deep ocean, such as in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and the Antarctic bottom water cell. The small ensemble spread and corresponding weak constraints by the deep Argo profiles with medium spatial and temporal resolution may explain why the deep Argo profiles did not improve the deep ocean features in the assimilation system. Additional studies using different assimilation methods with improved spatial and temporal resolution of the deep Argo array are necessary in order to more thoroughly understand the impact of the deep Argo array on the assimilation system.
Keywordsobserving system simulation experiment coupled data assimilation deep Argo array
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Delworth TL, Broccoli AJ, Rosati A, Stouffer RJ, Balaji V, Beesley JA, Cooke WF, Dixon KW, Dunne J, Dunne KA, Durachta JW, Findell KL, Ginoux P, Gnanadesikan A, Gordon CT, Griffies SM, Gudgel R, Harrison MJ, Held IM, Hemler RS, Horowitz LW, Klein SA, Knutson TR, Kushner PJ, Langenhorst AR, Lee H-C, Lin S-J, Lu J, Malyshev SL, Milly PCD, Ramaswamy V, Russell J, Schwarzkopf MD, Shevliakova E, Sirutis JJ, Spelman MJ, Stern WF, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Wyman B, Zeng F, Zhang R (2006) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: formulation and simulation characteristics. J Climate 19(5):643–674. doi:10.1175/JCLI3629.1Google Scholar
- Kobayashi T (2013) Deep NINJA collects profiles down to 4,000 meters. Sea Technol 54:41–44Google Scholar
- Kouketsu S, Doi T, Kawano T, Masuda S, Sugiura N, Sasaki Y, Toyoda T, Igarashi H, Kawai Y, Katsumata K, Uchida H, Fukasawa M, Awaji T (2011) Deep ocean heat content changes estimated from observation and reanalysis product and their influence on sea level change. J Geophys Res 116:C03012. doi:10.1029/2010JC006464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCarthy G, Frajka-Williams E, Johns WE, Baringer MO, Meinen CS, Bryden HL, Rayner D, Duchez A, Roberts C, Cunningham SA (2012) Observed interannual variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19609Google Scholar
- Song YT, Colberg F (2011) Deep ocean warming assessed from altimeters, gravity recovery and climate experiment, in situ measurements, and a non-Boussinesq ocean general circulation model. J Geophys Res 116:C02020. doi:10.1029/2010JC006601Google Scholar
- Zilberman N, Maze G (2015) Report on the deep Argo implementation workshop. IFREMER Doc. LPO-15-04, 36 pGoogle Scholar