Advertisement

Ocean Science Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 43–60 | Cite as

Contrast in life histories of exploited fishes and ecosystem structures in coastal waters off west Canada and east Korea

  • Gordon A. McFarlane
  • Chang Ik Zhang
  • Jacquelynne R. King
  • Suam Kim
  • Richard J. Beamish
  • Jae Ho Oh
Review

Abstract

By reviewing the history of fishery exploitation in the coastal waters of west Canada and east Korea, related with contrasting life history strategies of the dominant species, the fishery management challenges that each country would face in the upcoming decades were outlined. In the ecosystem of the Canadian western coastal waters, the dominant oceanographic feature is the coastal upwelling domain off the west coast of Vancouver Island, the northernmost extent of the California Current System in the eastern North Pacific. In the marine ecosystem of the eastern coasts of Korea (the Japan/East Sea), a major oceanographic feature is the Tsushima Warm Current, a branch of the Kuroshio Current in the western North Pacific. Fishes in the Canadian ecosystem are dominated by demersal, long-lived species such as flatfish, rockfish, sablefish, and halibut. During summer, migratory pelagic species such as Pacific hake, Pacific salmon, and recently Pacific sardine, move into this area to feed. In the late 1970s, Canada declared jurisdiction for 200 miles from their coastline, and major fisheries species in Canadian waters have been managed with a quota system. The overall fishing intensity off the west coast of Vancouver Island has been relatively moderate compared to Korean waters. Fishes in the ecosystem of the eastern Korean waters are dominated by short-lived pelagic and demersal fish. Historically, Korea has shared marine resources in this area with neighbouring countries, but stock assessments and quotas have only recently (since the late-1990s) been implemented for some major species. In the Korean ecosystem, fisheries can be described as intensive, and many stocks have been rated as overfished. The two ecosystems responded differently to climate impacts such as regime shifts under different exploitation histories. In the future, both countries will face the challenge of global warming and subsequent impacts on ecosystems, necessitating developing adaptive fisheries management plans. The challenges will be contrasting for the two countries: Canada will need to conserve fish populations, while Korea will need to focus on rebuilding depleted fish populations.

Key words

Canadian Pacific waters Japan/East Sea ecosystem comparison climate change life histories of fishes fisheries management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beamish RJ (2008) Impacts of climate and climate change on the key species in the fisheries in the North Pacific. PICES Scientific Report No 35, 217 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Beamish RJ, Bouillon DB (1993) Pacific salmon production trends in relation to climate. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1002–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beamish RJ, Mahnken C (2001) A critical size and critical period hypothesis to explain the natural regulation of salmon abundance and the linkage to climate and climate change. Prog Oceanogr 49:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beamish RJ, McFarlane GA (1999) Applying ecosystem management to fisheries in the Strait of Georgia. In: Ecosystem Approaches for Fisheries Management, Univ Alaska Sea Grant AK-SG-99-01, Fairbanks, pp 637–664Google Scholar
  5. Beamish RJ, McFarlane GA, King JR (2000) Fisheries Climatology: understanding the decadal scale processes that naturally regulate British Columbia fish populations. In: Harrison PJ, Parsons TR (ed) Fisheries Oceanography: an Integrative Approach to Fisheries Ecology and Management, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 94–145Google Scholar
  6. Beamish RJ, Neville CM, Sweeting RM, Poier KL (2001) Persistence of the improved productivity of 2000 in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Canada, through to 2001. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch — Pacific Region, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, Canada, NPAFC Doc. 565Google Scholar
  7. Beamish RJ, Noakes DJ, McFarlane GA, Klyashtorin L, Ivanov VV, Kurashov V (1999) The regime concept and natural trends in the production of Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beamish RJ, Riddell, Neville CM, Thomson BL, Zhang Z (1995) Declines in chinook salmon catches in the Strait of Georgia in relation to shifts in the marine environment. Fish Oceanogr 4:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beamish RJ, Schnute JT, Cass AT, Neville CM, Sweeting RM (2004) The influence of climate on the stock and recruitment of pink and sockeye salmon from the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1396–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang KI, Kim S, Suk MS, Kim CH, Yoo S (1999/2000) Overview of KORDI’s physical and biological research activties in the East/Japan Sea. MTS Journal 32:24–33Google Scholar
  11. Gong Y, Hirano T, Zhang CI (1985) A study on oceanic environmental conditions for Pacific saury in Korean waters. Bull Japan Soc Fish Oceanogr 47/48:36–58Google Scholar
  12. Guttormsen MD, Wilson CD, Cooke K, Saunders MW, McKelvey DR, Kieser R (2005) Echo Integration-trawl Survey of Pacific Hake, Merluccius productus, off the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada during June–August, 2001. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tech Mem NMFS-AFSC-65, 61 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Hahn SB (1994) SST warming of Korean coastal waters during 1881–1990. Korea Oceanographic Data Center Report 24, pp 29–37Google Scholar
  14. Hare SR, Mantua N (2000) Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989. Prog Oceanogr 47:103–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007a) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (ed) Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007b) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (ed) Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC (2007c) Climate Change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (ed) Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamieson G, Zhang CI (2005) Report of the study group on ecosystem-based management science and its application to the North Pacific. PICES Scientific Report No 29, 77 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung S (2008) Spatial variability in long-term changes of climate and oceanographic conditions in Korea. J Environ Biol 29:519–529Google Scholar
  20. Kim S (1995) Climate change and the fluctuation of fishery resources in the North Pacific. Ocean Pol Res 10:107–142Google Scholar
  21. Kim S (2003) Change in fisheries resources in relation to variability of ocean environment. J Korean Soc Fish Res 6:11–20Google Scholar
  22. Kim S, Kang S (1998) The status and research direction for fishery resources in the East Sea/Sea of Japan. J Korean Soc Fish Res 1:44–58Google Scholar
  23. Kim S, Khang S-H (2000) Yellow Sea. In: Sheppard C (ed) Seas at the Millennium: an environmental evaluation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 487–497Google Scholar
  24. Kim S, Zhang CI, Kim JY, Kim JY, Oh JH, Kang S, Lee JB (2007) Climate variability and its effects on major fisheries in Korea. Ocean Sci J 42(3):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King JR (ed) (2005) Report of the Study Group on Fisheries and Ecosystem Responses to Recent Regime Shifts. PICES Scientific Report No 28, 162 pGoogle Scholar
  26. King JR, McFarlane GA (2003) Marine fish life history strategies: applications to fishery management. Fish Manag Ecol 10:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King JR, McFarlane GA (2006) A framework for incorporating climate regime shifts into the management of marine resources. Fish Manag Ecol 13:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee SW (1992) Hankuk-kunhae-haesangji. Jibmundang, Seoul, 334 p (In Korean)Google Scholar
  29. McFarlane GA, Beamish RJ (1992) Climatic influences linking copepod production with strong year classes in sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 19:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McFarlane GA, King JR, Beamish RJ (2000) Have there been recent changes in climate? Ask the fish. Prog Oceanogr 41:147–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minobe S (1997) A 50–70 year oscillation over the North Pacific and North America. Geophys Res Lett 24:683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Minobe S (2002) Interannual to interdecadal changes in the Bering Sea and concurrent 1998/99 changes over the North Pacific. Prog Oceanogr 55:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MOMAF(Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries) (1997–2006) Statistical year book of maritime affairs and fisheries. Korea Ministry of Maritime Affairs and FisheriesGoogle Scholar
  34. MOMAF(Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries) (2000) Studies on the TAC-based fisheries management system and quota allocations for jointly exploited fisheries resource under the EEZ regime. MOMAF, Seoul, Korea, 542 pGoogle Scholar
  35. MOMAF(Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries) (2003) Climate effects on marine ecosystem and fisheries resources. MOMAF, Seoul, Korea, 193 pGoogle Scholar
  36. MOMAF(Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries) (2005) Statistical year book of maritime affairs and fisheries. MOMAF, Seoul, Korea, 335 pGoogle Scholar
  37. MOMAF(Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries) (2007) Studies on the ecosystem-based resource management system. MOMAF, Seoul, Korea, 241 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Mote PW, Canning DJ, Fluharty DL, Francis RC, Franklin JF, Hamlet AF, Hershman M, Holmberg M, Ideker KN, Keeton WS, Lettenmaier DP, Leung LR, Mantua NJ, Miles EL, Noble B, Parandvash H, Peterson DW, Snover AK, Willard SR (1999) Impacts of Climate Change: Pacific Northwest. National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, Office of Global Programs, and JISAO/SMA Climate Impacts Group, Seattle, WA, 110 pGoogle Scholar
  39. NFRDI(National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) (2005) Ecology and Fishing Ground of Major Fishery Resources in the Korean EEZ. Yemoonsa Pub Co, Busan, 307 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Overland J, Rodionov S, Minobe S, Bond N (2008) North Pacific regime shifts: definitions, issues and recent transitions. Prog Oceanogr 77:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oh J-H, Kim T, Kim MK, Lee SH, Min SK, Kwon WT (2004) Regional climate simulation for Korea using dynamic downscaling and statistical adjustment. J Meteorol Soc Japan 82(6):1629–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. PICES (2004) Marine Ecosystems of the North Pacific. PICES Special Publication 1, 280 pGoogle Scholar
  43. Raible CC, Stocker TF, Yoshimori M, Renold M, Beyerle U, Casty C, Luterbacher J (2005) Northern hemispheric trends of pressure indices and atmospheric circulation patterns in observations, reconstructions, and coupled GCM simulations. J Climate 18:3968–3982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sakurai Y, Kiyofuji H, Saitoh S, Goto T, Hiyama Y (2000) Change in inferred spawning areas of Todarodes pacificus (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) due to changing environmental conditions. ICES J Mar Sci 57:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sakurai Y, Kiyofuji H, Satito S, Yamamoto J, Goto Y, Mori K (2002) Stock fluctuations of the Japanese common squid, Todarodes pacificus, related to recent climate changes. Fish Sci 68(Supppl. I):226–229Google Scholar
  46. Seo H, Kim S, Seong K, Kang S (2006) Variability in scale growth rates of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in relation to climate changes in the late 1980s. Prog Oceanogr 68:205–216Google Scholar
  47. Trudel M, Welch DW, Morris JFT, Candy JR, Beacham TD (2004) Using genetic markers to understand the coastal migration of juvenile coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). North Pacific Anadromous Fisheries Commission Technical Report 5, pp 52–54Google Scholar
  48. Ware DM, McFarlane GA (1989) Fisheries production domains in the northeast Pacific ocean. In: Beamish RJ, McFarlane GA (ed) Effects of ocean variability on recruitment and an evaluation of parameters in stock assessment models, Can Spec Pub Fish Aquat Sci 108, pp 359–379Google Scholar
  49. Wilson CD, Guttormsen MA, Cooke K, Saunders MW, Kieser R (2000) Echo integration-trawl survey of Pacific hake, merluccius productus, off the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada during July–August, 1998. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tech Mem NMFS-AFSC-118, 103 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Wooster WS, Zhang CI (2004) Regime shift in the North Pacific: early indications of the 1976–1977 event. Prog Oceanogr 60:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang CI, Gong Y (2005) Effect of ocean changes on the Korean stock of Pacific saury, Cololabis saira (BREVOORT). J Oceanogr 61:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang CI, Lee SK (2004)) Trophic levels and fishing intensities in Korean marine ecosystem. J. Korea Soc Fish 6(2):140–152Google Scholar
  53. Zhang CI, Marasco RJ (2003) New appoaches in fisheries assessment and management under the exclusive economic zone regime in Korea. Am Fish Soc Symp 38:685–693Google Scholar
  54. Zhang CI, Lee JB, Kim S, Oh J-H (1999) Effects of regime shifts on fish stocks in Korean waters. In: Saxena NK (ed) Recent Advances in Marine Science and Technology 1999, Pacific Congress on Marine Science and Technology (PACON) International, Honolulu, USA, pp 81–92Google Scholar
  55. Zhang CI, Lee JB, Kim S, Oh J-H (2000) Climatic regime shifts and their impacts on marine ecosystem and fisheries resources in Korean waters. Prog Oceanogr 47:171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang CI, Lee JB, Seo YI, Yoon SC, Kim S (2004) Variations in the abundance of fisheries resources and ecosystem structure in the Japan/East Sea. Prog Oceanogr 61:245–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang CI, Kim S, Gunderson D, Marasco R, Lee JB, Park HW, Lee JH (2009) An ecosystem-based fisheries assessment approach for Korean fisheries. Fish Res. doi:10.1016/j.fishres. 2008.12.002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute (KORDI) and the Korean Society of Oceanography (KSO) and Springer Netherlands 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon A. McFarlane
    • 1
  • Chang Ik Zhang
    • 2
  • Jacquelynne R. King
    • 1
  • Suam Kim
    • 3
  • Richard J. Beamish
    • 1
  • Jae Ho Oh
    • 4
  1. 1.Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and OceansNanaimoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Marine Production System and ManagementPukyong National UniversityBusanKorea
  3. 3.Department of Marine BiologyPukyong National UniversityBusanKorea
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Atmospheric SciencesPukyong National UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations