Stem inoculation with bacterial strains Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03) and Microbacterium imperiale (MAIIF2a) mitigates Fusarium root rot in cassava
- 149 Downloads
Cassava (Manihot esculenta), a major staple food in the developing world provides a starch-based carbohydrate diet for over half-a-billion people living in the tropics. Despite the plant’s resistance to most local insect pests and bacterial pathogens, cassava is susceptible to root rot caused by Fusarium solani. With the recent identification that the beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03) increases iron accumulation in cassava, the question arises as to whether plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) also induces plant resistance to fungal infection and in turn, ameliorate cassava disease symptoms. Phytopathological analyses reveal that shoot-propagated cassava, inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03) or Microbacterium imperiale (MAIIF2a) induces increased shoot and root growth by over 100% compared to un-inoculated controls. Moreover, PGPR inoculation lowered disease incidence in greenhouse-grown plants by over half compared to media treated controls and reduced mycelial growth and fungal colonization with in vitro cassava-plant assays. These results demonstrate the integrated role beneficial bacteria play to increase plant growth and protect against pathogen infection in a starch crop that is cultivated on a global scale.
KeywordsBacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03) Microbacterium imperiale (MAIIF2a) Fusarium solani root rot Induced systemic resistance (ISR) Manihot esculenta (cassava) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)
Funding was generously provided by The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Process 401330/2014-1).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Altindag, M., Sahin, M., Esitken, A., Ercisli, S., Guleryuz, M., Donmez, M. F., & Sahin, F. (2006). Biological control of brown rot (Moniliana laxa Ehr.) on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Hacihaliloglu) by Bacillus, Burkholderia and Pseudomonas application under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Biological Control, 38, 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cardoso, E. M. R., Poltronieri, L. S., & Trindade, D. R. (2000). Recomendações para o controle da podridão mole de raízes de mandioca no Estado do Pará. Belém: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Circular Técnica, 13, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Cubeta, M. A., Hartman, G. L., & Sinclair, J. B. (1985). Interaction between Bacillus subtilis and fungi associated with soybeen seeds. Plant Disease, 69, 506–509.Google Scholar
- Datnoff, L. E., Elmer, W. H., & Huber, D. M. (2007). Mineral nutrition and plant diseases (p. 278). Saint Paul: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
- Howeler R, Lutaladio N, Thomas G (2013) Save and grow cassava: a guide to sustainable production intensification. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome 130 p.Google Scholar
- Jha, C. K., & Saraf, M. (2015). Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Journal of Agricultural Research Development, 5, 108–119.Google Scholar
- Keinath, A. P., Batson Jr., W. E., Caceres, J., Sumner, M. L. D. R., Brannen, P. M., Rothrock, C. S., Huber, D. M., Benson, D. M., Conway, K. E., Schneider, R. N., Motsenbocker, C. E., Cubeta, M. A., Ownley, B. H., Canaday, C. H., Adams, P. D., & Backman, F. J. (2000). Evaluation of biological and chemical seed treatments to improve stand of snap bean across the southern United States. Crop Protection, 19, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khalid, A., Sultana, S., Arshad, M., Mahmood, S., Mahmood, T., & Siddique, M. T. (2011). Performance of auxin producing rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat and rice grown in rotation under field conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Applied Science, 3, 44–50.Google Scholar
- Melo, I. S., Faria, R., & Teixeira, M. A. (2005). Diversidade de bactérias endofíticas na cultura da mandioca. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 33, 6–24.Google Scholar
- Nehl DB, Knox OGG (2006) Significance of bacteria in the rhizosphere in: Mukerji, K.; Manoharachary, C.; Singh, J. Soil Biology: Microbial activity in the rhizoshere. (pp. 89–119) Berlin: Springer, GER.Google Scholar
- Notaro, K. A., Medeiros, E. V., Silva, C., & Barros, J. A. (2013). Prospecting of phytopathogens associated to cassava root rot in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Bioscience Journal, 29, 1832–1839.Google Scholar
- Prabakar, K., & Reguchander, T. (2000). Fungicidal control of cassava brown leaf spot caused by Cercospora henningsii Allescher. The Madras Agricultural Journal, 87, 537–538.Google Scholar
- Quandt-Hallmann, A., Hallmann, J., & Kloepper, J. W. (1997). Bacterial endophytes in cotton: Location and interaction with other plant-associated bacteria. Journal of Microbiology, 43, 254–259.Google Scholar
- Robbs CF (1991) Bacteria as agents of biological control of phytopathogens. In: Bettiol, W. Controle biológico de doenças de plantas. Embrapa, (pp. 121–133). Jaguariúna- São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
- Spaepen, S., & Vanderleyden, J. (2010). Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 3. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001438.
- Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M. L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., & Prigent-Combaret, C. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Plant Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356.