Advertisement

Phytoparasitica

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 329–336 | Cite as

Monitoring of the pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis by pheromone traps in Italy

  • D. Rassati
  • E. Petrucco Toffolo
  • A. Battisti
  • M. FaccoliEmail author
Article

Abstract

The pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Olivier) (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) gained importance as a pest in Europe after the introduction in Portugal of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, the agent of pine wilt disease. As the nematode is transmitted by the adult beetles during both maturation feeding and oviposition, effective methods of monitoring of the longhorn beetle populations are needed for the surveillance of the disease spread in Europe. Although in the last years many studies focused on the efficacy of different trapping methods, the general results are still controversial. In this study, we compared the efficiency of two trap types, cross-vane and multi-funnel, and two attractive blends, a kairomonal lure (α-pinene, ipsenol and methyl-butenol) and a commercial kit specific for M. galloprovincialis (pheromone plus kairomonal lure), in order to identify the trap/blend combination more appropriate for the surveillance of the M. galloprovincialis populations. Moreover, the trap efficiency was tested also in a pine stand colonized by M. galloprovincialis after a hailstorm and in a control stand. The results showed that the multi-funnel traps baited with the specific commercial kit was the most effective combination. Interestingly, trap catch was similar in the two pine stands, despite a different density of the target species. As the trapping method was effective also at low population density of M. galloprovincialis, it may be adopted as a general tool for beetle surveillance in the forest and at ports of entry.

Keywords

Aggregation pheromone Attractive blends Beetle surveillance Cross-vane trap Longhorn beetles Multi-funnel trap Pinus 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Regional Plant Protection Organization of Friuli Venezia Giulia, the Regional Forest Service stations of Villa Santina (Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy) for the collaboration during the research, and Gabriella Frigimelica, Mauro Simonato, and Daniel Zovi (University of Padova) for the help in field work. This study was supported by the Q-DETECT project (Development of detection methods for quarantine plant pests for use by plant health inspection services) financed through the EU Seventh Research Framework Program (FP7) (Contract No. 245047).

References

  1. Acosta, J., Krajnc, B., Gonzales, G., & Solla, A. (2009). Monochamus galloprovincialis en masas de Pinus pinaster al norte de Extremadura. Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales, Junta de Castilla-León (Eds.) Proceedings of the “5º Congreso Forestal Español” (Pontevedra, Spain).Google Scholar
  2. Allison, J. D., Borden, J. H., & Seybold, S. J. (2004). A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology, 14, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costello, S. L., Negron, J. F., & Jacobi, W. R. (2008). Traps and attractants for wood-boring insects in ponderosa pine stands in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101, 409–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui, X., Chen, H., Zhao, J., Yang, S., & Zhou, Q. (2008). Population dynamics of major Coleoptera insects in pine forest in northern piedmont of Kuocang mountain. Forest Research, 21, 340–345.Google Scholar
  5. De Groot, P., & Nott, R. W. (2001). Evaluation of traps of six different designs to capture pine sawyer beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 3, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Groot, P., & Nott, R. W. (2003). Response of Monochamus (Col., Cerambycidae) and some Buprestidae to flight intercept traps. Journal of Applied Entomology, 127, 548–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dropkin, V. H., Foudin, A., Kondo, E., Linit, M., Smith, M., & Robbins, K. (1981). Pinewood nematode: a threat to U.S. forests? Plant Disease, 65, 1022–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPPO/CABI. (1997). In I. M. Smith, D. G. McNamara, P. R. Scott, & M. Holderness (Eds.), Quarantine pests for Europe (2nd ed.). Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
  9. Fan, T. J., Miller, D. R., Zhang, L. W., & Sun, J. H. (2010). Effects of bark beetle pheromones on the attraction of Monochamus alternatus to pine volatiles. Insect Science, 17, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francardi, V., & Pennacchio, F. (1996). Note sulla bioecologia di Monochamus galloprovincialis (Olivier) in Toscana e in Liguria (Coleoptera Cerambycidae). Redia, 79, 153–169.Google Scholar
  11. Francardi, V., de Silva, J., Pennacchio, F., & Roversi, P. F. (2009). Pine volatiles and terpenoid compounds attractive to European xylophagous species, vectors of Bursaphelenchus spp. nematodes. Phytoparasitica, 37, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gandhi, K. J. K., Gilmore, D. W., Katovich, S. A., Mattson, W. J., Spence, J. R., & Seybold, S. J. (2007). Physical effects of weather events on the abundance and diversity of insects in North American forests. Environmental Reviews, 15, 113–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hellrigl, K. G. (1970). Die Bionomie der europäischen Monochamus-arten (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) und ihre Bedeutung für die Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Redia, 52, 367–509.Google Scholar
  14. Ibeas, F., Gallego, D., Diez, J. J., & Pajares, J. A. (2007). An operative kairomonal lure for managing pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 131, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikeda, T., Enda, N., Yamane, A., Oda, K., & Toyoda, T. (1980). Attractants for the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 15, 358–361.Google Scholar
  16. Mamiya, Y. (1972). Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus lignicolous Mamiya and Kiyohara, as causal agent of pine wilting disease. Review of Plant Protection Research, 5, 46–60.Google Scholar
  17. Mamiya, Y. (1983). Pathology of the pine wilt disease caused by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 21, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mamiya, Y., & Enda, N. (1972). Transmission of Bursaphelenchus lignicolous (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) by Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Nematologica, 18, 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCullough, D. G., Werner, R. A., & Neumann, D. (1998). Fire and insects in northern and boreal forest ecosystems of North America. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 107–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McIntosh, R. L., Katinic, P. J., Allison, J. D., Borden, J. H., & Downey, D. L. (2001). Comparative efficacy of five types of traps for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 3, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, D. R., & Asaro, C. (2005). Ipsenol and ipsdienol attract Monochamus titillator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and associated large pine woodborers in southeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 2033–2040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morewood, W. D., Hein, K. E., Katinic, P. J., & Borden, J. H. (2002). An improved trap for large wood-boring insects, with special reference to Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 32, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nageleisen, L. M., & Bouget, C., coord., (2009) Forest insect studies: methods and techniques. Key considerations for standardisation. An overview of the reflections of the “Entomological Forest Inventories” working group. Les Dossiers Forestiers n. 19 Paris, France: Office National des Forêts.Google Scholar
  24. Nakamura, K. (2008). Attraction trap for monitoring Monochamus alternatus adults—Its usefulness and limitations. In M. M. Mota & P. Vieira (Eds.), Pine wilt disease: A worldwide threat to forest ecosystems (pp. 369–378). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naves, P. M., Camacho, S., Sousa, E. M., & Quartau, J. A. (2007). Transmission of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus through feeding activity of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 131, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naves, P. M., Sousa, E., & Rodrigues, J. M. (2008). Biology of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) in the pine wilt disease affected zone, Southern Portugal. Silva Lusitana, 16, 133–148.Google Scholar
  27. Pajares, J. A., Ibeas, F., Diez, J. J., & Gallego, D. (2004). Attractive responses by Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col. Cerambycidae) to host and bark beetle semiochemicals. Journal of Applied Entomology, 126, 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pajares, J. A., Gonzalo, A., & Ibeas, F. (2010). Identification and field activity of a male-produced aggregation pheromone in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus galloprovincialis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36, 570–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutherford, T. A., Mamiya, Y., & Webster, J. M. (1990). Nematode-induced pine wilt disease: factors influencing its occurrence and distribution. Forest Science, 36, 145–155.Google Scholar
  30. Saint-Germain, M., Drapeau, P., & Hébert, C. (2004). Landscape-scale habitat selection patterns of Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in a recently burned black spruce forest. Environmental Entomology, 33, 1703–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schröeder, T., McNamara, D. G., & Gaar, V. (2009). Guidance on sampling to detect pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in trees, wood and insects. Eppo/OEPP Bulletin, 39, 179–188.Google Scholar
  32. Sousa, E., Bravo, M. A., Pires, J., Naves, P., Penas, A. C., Bonifacio, L., et al. (2001). Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) associated with Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Portugal. Nematology, 3, 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sousa, E., Naves, P., Bonifacio, L., Bravo, M. A., Penas, A. C., Pires, J., et al. (2003). Preliminary survey for insects associated with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin, 32, 499–502.Google Scholar
  34. Stefanutto, L. (2003). Lezioni di clima. http://www.arpa.fvg.it/
  35. Sweeney, J., De Groot, P., MacDonald, L., Smith, S., Cocquempot, C., Kenis, M., et al. (2004). Host volatile attractants and traps for detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.), Tetropium castaneum L., and other longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 33, 844–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Rassati
    • 1
  • E. Petrucco Toffolo
    • 1
  • A. Battisti
    • 1
  • M. Faccoli
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department DAFNAE-EntomologyUniversity of PadovaLegnaroItaly

Personalised recommendations