Phytoparasitica

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 455–460 | Cite as

Activity of ß-1,3-glucanase and ß-1,4-glucanase in two potato cultivars following challenge by the fungal pathogen Alternaria solani

  • Hadis Shahbazi
  • Heshmatolah Aminian
  • Navazollah Sahebani
  • Dennis A. Halterman
Article

Abstract

Early blight of potato, caused by Alternaria solani, is a ubiquitous disease in many countries around the world. Our previous screening of several Iranian potato cultivars found that variation in resistance exists between two cultivars: ‘Diamond’ and ‘Granula’. Cultivar Diamond is more resistant to multiple isolates of A. solani when compared to cv. Granula. Furthermore, we have found that different pathogen isolates have varying degrees of infection. We monitored the activities of two pathogen-related (PR) glucanase proteins in Diamond and Granula in response to two isolates of A. solani with different degrees of virulence. ß-1,3-glucanase and ß-1,4-glucanase activities were recorded in healthy and diseased leaves of potatoes up to 10 days after inoculation. Their activities were found to be higher in diseased leaves when compared to those of uninfected leaves. Our data suggest that significantly reduced activities of theses enzymes in potato could be related to a lower degree of resistance or an increased ability of a more aggressive isolate to suppress PR protein expression.

Keywords

Early blight Pathogen-related protein Solanum tuberosum 

References

  1. Abad, L. R., D'Urzo, M. P., Liu, D., Narasimhan, M. L., Reuveni, M., Zhu, J. K., et al. (1996). Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Science, 119, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abeles, F. B., Bosshart, R. P., Forrence, L. E., & Habig, W. H. (1971). Preparation and purification of glucanase and chitinase from bean leaves. Plant Physiology, 47, 129–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye-binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchel, A., & Linthorst, H. (1999). PR-1: A group of plant proteins induced upon pathogen infection. In S. Datta & S. Muthukrishnan (Eds.), Pathogenesis-related proteins in plants (pp. 21–47). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006). Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell, 124, 803–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edreva, A. (2005). Pathogenesis-related proteins: Research progress in the last 15 years. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 31, 105–124.Google Scholar
  7. Flors, V., Leyva, M. D. L. O., Vicedo, B., Finiti, I., Real, M. D., García-Agustín, P., et al. (2007). Absence of the endo-β-1,4-glucanases Cel1 and Cel2 reduces susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. The Plant Journal, 52, 1027–1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gau, A. E., Koutb, M., Piotrowski, M., & Kloppstech, K. (2004). Accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins in the apoplast of a susceptible cultivar of apple (Malus domestica cv. Elstar) after infection by Venturia inaequalis and constitutive expression of PR genes in the resistant cultivar Remo. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110, 703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeun, Y-Ch., & Buchenauer, H. (2001). Infection structures and localization of the pathogenesis-related protein AP24 in leaves of tomato plants exhibiting systemic acquired resistance against Phytophthora infestans after pre-treatment with 3-aminobutyric acid or tobacco necrosis virus. Journal of Phytopathology, 149, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lawrence, C. B., Joosten, M. H. A. J., & Tuzun, S. (1996). Differential induction of pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato by Alternaria solani and the association of a basic chitinase isozyme with resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 48, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence, C. B., Singh, N. P., Qiu, J., Gardner, R. G., & Tuzun, S. (2000). Constitutive hydrolytic enzymes are associated with polygenic resistance of tomato to Alternaria solani and may function as an elicitor release mechanism. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 57, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS® system for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Madhaiyan, M., Poonguzhali, S., Senthikumar, M., Seshadri, S., Chung, H., Yong, J., et al. (2004). Growth promotion and induction of systemic resistance in rice cultivar Co-47 (Oryza sativa) by Methylobacterium spp. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 45, 315–324.Google Scholar
  14. Pelletier, J., & Fry, W. (1989). Characterization of resistance to early blight in three potato cultivars: Incubation period, lesion expansion rate, and spore production. Phytopathology, 9, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poupard, P., Parisi, L., Campion, C., Ziadi, S., & Simoneau, P. (2003). A wound- and ethephon-inducible PR-10 gene subclass from apple is differentially expressed during infection with a compatible and an incompatible race of Venturia inaequalis. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 62, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Selitrennikoff, C. P. (2001). Antifungal proteins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 2883–2894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shahbazi, H., Aminian, H., Sahebani, N., & Halterman, D. (2010). Biochemical evaluation of resistance responses of potato to different isolates of Alternaria solani. Phytopathology, 100, 454–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tonón, C., Guevara, G., Oliva, C., & Daleo, G. (2002). Isolation of a potato acidic 39 kDa β-1,3-glucanase with antifungal activity against Phytophthora infestans and analysis of its expression in potato cultivars differing in their degrees of field resistance. Journal of Phytopathology, 150, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valmeekam, V., Loh, Y. L., & San Francisco, M. J. (2001). Control of exuT activity for galacturonate transport by the negative regulator ExuR in Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 14, 816–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44, 135–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Loon, L. C., & van Strien, E. A. (1999). The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 55, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vigers, A., Roberts, W., & Selitrennikoff, C. (1991). A new family of plant antifungal proteins. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 4, 315–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vigers, A., Wiedemann, S., Roberts, W., Legrand, M., Selitrennikoff, C., & Fritig, B. (1992). Thaumatin-like pathogenesis-related proteins are antifungal. Plant Science, 83, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vleeshouwers, V. G., Van Dooijeweert, W., Govers, F., Kamoun, S., & Colon, L. T. (2000). The hypersensitive response is associated with host and nonhost resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Planta, 210, 853–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vögeli-Lange, R., Fründt, C., Hart, C. M., Beffa, R., Nagy, F., & Meins, F., Jr. (1994). Evidence for a role of ß-1,3-glucanase in dicot seed germination. The Plant Journal, 5, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wubben, J. P., Lawrence, C. B., & de Wit, P. J. G. M. (1996). Differential induction of chitinase and 1,3-ß-glucanase gene expression in tomato by Cladosporium fulvum and its race-specific elicitors. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 48, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yedidia, I., Benhamou, N., Kapulnik, Y., & Chet, I. (2000). Induction and accumulation of PR proteins activity during early stages of root colonization by the mycoparasite Trichoderma harzianum strain T-203. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 38, 863–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadis Shahbazi
    • 1
  • Heshmatolah Aminian
    • 2
  • Navazollah Sahebani
    • 2
  • Dennis A. Halterman
    • 3
  1. 1.Young Researchers Club, Arak BranchIslamic Azad UniversityArakIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant Protection, Aboryhan CampusTehran UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.U.S. Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service, Vegetable Crops Research UnitMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations