Advertisement

Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 259–264 | Cite as

Digital Work Design

The Interplay of Human and Computer in Future Work Practices as an Interdisciplinary (Grand) Challenge
  • Alexander Richter
  • Peter Heinrich
  • Alexander Stocker
  • Gerhard Schwabe
Catchword

Introduction

More and more academic studies and practitioner reports claim that human work is increasingly disrupted or even determined by information and communication technology (ICT) (Cascio and Montealegre 2016). This will make a considerable share of jobs currently performed by humans susceptible to automation (e.g., Frey and Osborne 2017; Manyika et al. 2017). These reports often sketch a picture of ‘machines taking over’ traditional domains like manufacturing, while ICT advances and capabilities seem to decide companies’ fate. Consequently, ICT is often put at the core of innovative efforts. While this applies to nearly all areas of workplace design, a recent popular example of increasing technology centricity is ‘Industry 4.0’, which is often delineated as ‘machines talking to computers’.

As objects in the physical environment increasingly house advanced computing and communication capabilities, the resulting composite systems are often referred to as cyber-physical systems...

Keywords

Digitalization Industry 4.0 Human-centered design Cyber-physical production system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author wants to thank Shahper Richter and Michael Koch for their feedback for this paper and their guidance in many other occasions. This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 636778.

References

  1. Bergman M, Lyytinen K, Mark G (2007) Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(11):546–568Google Scholar
  2. Bødker S, Grønbæk K (1991) Cooperative prototyping: users and designers in mutual activity. Int J Man Mach Stud 34(3):453–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bødker K, Kensing F, Simonsen J (2009) Participatory IT design: designing for business and workplace realities. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratteteig T, Wagner I (2016) Unpacking the notion of participation in participatory design. Comput Supported Coop Work 25(6):425–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cascio WF, Montealegre R (2016) How technology is changing work and organizations. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 3:349–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (2013) Multi annual roadmap for the contractual PPP under horizon 2020. http://www.effra.eu/sites/default/files/factories_of_the_future_2020_roadmap.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
  8. Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ Sci 22(5):1240–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floyd C, Mehl W-M, Reisin F-M, Schmidt G, Wolf G (1989) Out of Scandinavia: alternative approaches to software design and system development. Hum Comput Interact 4:253–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol Forecast Soc Change 114(1):254–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol 92(5):1332–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luczak H (2013) Arbeitswissenschaft. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  14. Manyika J, Chui M, Miremadi M, Bughin J, George K, Willmott P, Dewhurst M (2017) A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Mumford E (2003) Redesigning human systems. IGI Global, HersheyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nicolini D (2012) Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen L (2012) Personas-user focused design. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker SK, Wall TD, Cordery JL (2001) Future work design research and practice: towards an elaborated model of work design. J Occup Organ Psychol 74(4):413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pruitt J, Grudin J (2003) Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences, ACM, San Francisco, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  21. Rajkumar RR, Lee I, Sha L, Stankovic J (2010) Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. In: Proceedings of the 47th design automation conference, ACM, Anaheim, pp 731–736Google Scholar
  22. Randall D, Harper R, Rouncefield M (2007) Fieldwork for design: theory and practice. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richter A, Riemer K (2013) Malleable end-user software. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(3):195–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2002) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human–computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Schoder D, Putzke J, Metaxas PT, Gloor PA, Fischbach K (2014) Information systems for “wicked problems”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wagner I, Bratteteig T, Stuedahl D (2010) Exploring digital design. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wall TD, Corbett JM, Clegg CW, Jackson PR, Martin R (1990) Advanced manufacturing technology and work design: towards a theoretical framework. J Organ Behav 11(3):201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willcocks L, Lacity M, Craig A (2017) Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services? J Inf Technol Teach Cases 7(1):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wortmann F, Flüchter K (2015) Internet of things. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(3):221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Richter
    • 1
  • Peter Heinrich
    • 2
  • Alexander Stocker
    • 3
  • Gerhard Schwabe
    • 4
  1. 1.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark
  2. 2.Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte WissenschaftenWinterthurSwitzerland
  3. 3.Virtual Vehicle Research CenterGrazAustria
  4. 4.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations