Advertisement

Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 425–440 | Cite as

Trading Real-World Assets on Blockchain

An Application of Trust-Free Transaction Systems in the Market for Lemons
  • Benedikt Notheisen
  • Jacob Benjamin Cholewa
  • Arun Prasad Shanmugam
Research Paper

Abstract

Since its introduction in 2008, blockchain technology has outgrown its use in cryptocurrencies and is now preparing to revolutionize a multitude of commercial applications including value and supply chains, business models, and market structures. This work follows design science research to guide the implementation of a blockchain-based proof-of-concept prototype that enables the automated transaction of real-world assets, such as cars, and provides a valid, transparent, and immutable record of vehicle history to market participants, authorities, and other third parties. The contribution of this study to existing research is threefold: First, it introduces a built-in mechanism to reduce transaction risk resulting from the irreversibility of transactions in blockchain-based systems. Second, it replaces a trust-based, centralized, and bureaucratic register with a tamper-free and autonomous transactional database system that comprises a secure registration and transaction process. Third, it proposes a novel approach to mitigate adverse selection effects in lemon markets by providing a reliable, transparent, and complete record of each marketable asset’s history. In total, the findings in this article illustrate the potential of blockchain-based systems but also highlight technological shortcomings and challenges for commercial applications, such as scalability or privacy issues.

Keywords

Blockchain Design science research Trust-free commercial system Asymmetric information Market for lemons 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the IT University of Copenhagen for giving us the opportunity to attend the Blockchain Summer School 2016, SKAT for the chance to work on this specific use case, and Felix Albert and Martin Dybdal for their contributions in the initial draft of our prototype during the summer school’s hackathon. We also want to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors Roman Beck, Michel Avital, Matti Rossi, and Jason Thatcher for their valuable feedback and constructive criticism, which greatly improved the paper. In addition, this paper has greatly benefited from the comments by the participants of the Institute of Information System and Marketing’s 2016 winter retreat and the remarks of Christof Weinhardt and Florian Glaser. Finally, financial support of Boerse Stuttgart is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Akerlof GA (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson L, Holz R, Ponomarev A, Rimba P, Weber I (2016) New kids on the block: an analysis of modern blockchains. CoRR abs/1606.06530Google Scholar
  3. Ateniese G, Bonacina I, Faonio A, Galesi N (2014) Proofs of space: when space is of the essence. In: 9th International conference on security and cryptography for networks (SCN), pp 538–557Google Scholar
  4. Beck R, Stenum Czepluch J, Lollike N, Malone S (2016) Blockchain—the gateway to trustfree cryptographic transactions. In: 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS)Google Scholar
  5. Bellare M, Namprempre C, Neven G (2009) Security proofs for identity-based identification and signature schemes. J Cryptol 22(1):1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Böhme R, Nicolas C, Edelman B, Moore T (2015) Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance. J Econ Perspect 2(22):213–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond EW (1982) A direct test of the “lemons” model: the market for used pickup trucks. Am Econ Rev 72(4):836–840Google Scholar
  8. Brenig C, Schwarz J, Rückeshäuser N (2016) Value of decentralized consensus systems—evaluation framework. In: 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS)Google Scholar
  9. Broadbent B (2016) Central banks and digital currencies. Speech at the London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  10. Buterin V (2013) Ethereum white paper: a next generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper
  11. Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016) Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4:2292–2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly TM, Begg CE (2015) Database systems: a practical approach to design, implementation, and management, 6th edn. Always learning. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson S, de Filippi P, Potts J (2016) Economics of blockchain. SSRNGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinger J, Hartenstein H (2006) Defending the sybil attack in p2p networks: taxonomy, challenges, and a proposal for self-registration. In: First international conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES’06), pp 756–763Google Scholar
  15. Djankov S, McLiesh C, Shleifer A (2007) Private credit in 129 countries. J Financ Econ 84(2):299–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douceur JR (2002) The sybil attack. In: Druschel P, Kaashoek F, Rowstron A (eds) International workshop on peer-to-peer systems (IPTPS), pp 251–260Google Scholar
  17. Dziembowski S, Faust S, Kolmogorov V, Pietrzak K (2015) Proofs of space. In: 35th Annual cryptology conference (CRYPTO), pp 585–605Google Scholar
  18. Economist (2015) The trust machine: the promise of the blockchainGoogle Scholar
  19. Elmasri R, Navathe SB (2015) Fundamentals of database systems, 7th edn. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Fairfield JA (2015) Bitproperty. South Calif Law Rev 88:261–277Google Scholar
  21. Fujimura S, Watanabe H, Nakadaira A, Yamada T, Akutsu A, Kishigami JJ (2015) BRIGHT: a concept for a decentralized rights management system based on blockchain. In: IEEE 5th international conference on consumer electronics, pp 345–346Google Scholar
  22. Gavazza A, Lizzeri A, Roketskiy N (2014) A quantitative analysis of the used-car market. Am Econ Rev 104(11):3668–3700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Genesove D (1993) Adverse selection in the wholesale used car market. J Polit Econ 101(4):644–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gervais A, Karame GO, Wüst K, Glykantzis V, Ritzdorf H, Capkun S (2016) On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In: ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  25. Gipp B, Meuschke N, Gernandt A (2015) Decentralized trusted timestamping using the crypto currency bitcoin. CoRR abs/1502.04015Google Scholar
  26. Glaser F (2017) Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In: 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS)Google Scholar
  27. Glaser F, Bezzenberger L (2015) Beyond cryptocurrencies—a taxonomy of decentralized consensus systems. In: 23rd European conference on information systems (ECIS)Google Scholar
  28. Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 2(37):337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greiner M, Hui W (2015) Trust-free systems - a new research and design direction to handle trust-issues in P2P systems: the case of Bitcoin. In: 21st Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS)Google Scholar
  30. Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M (2013) Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener Comput Syst 29(7):1645–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999) Adverse selection in durable goods markets. Am Econ Rev 89:1097–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hendel I, Lizzeri A, Siniscalchi M (2005) Efficient sorting in a dynamic adverse-selection model. Rev Econ Stud 72(2):467–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Sudha R (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 1(28):75–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jappelli T, Pagano M (2002) Information sharing, lending and defaults: cross-country evidence. J Bank Financ 26(10):2017–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karapetyan A, Stacescu B (2014) Information sharing and information acquisition in credit markets. Rev Financ 18(4):1583–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kiayias A, Konstantinou I, Russell A, David B, Oliynykov R (2016) A provably secure proof-of-stake blockchain protocol. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/889Google Scholar
  37. Kosba A, Miller A, Shi E, Wen Z, Papamanthou C (2015) Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts, pp 839–858Google Scholar
  38. Lamport L, Shostak R, Pease M (1982) The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 4(3):382–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis G (2011) Asymmetric information, adverse selection and online disclosure: the case of ebay motors. Am Econ Rev 101(4):1535–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li CT, Weng CY, Lee CC, Wang CC (2015) A hash based remote user authentication and authenticated key agreement scheme for the integrated epr information system. J Med Syst 39(11):144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lustig C, Nardi B (2015) Algorithmic authority: the case of Bitcoin. In: 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS)Google Scholar
  42. March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis Support Syst 15(4):251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maurer B, Nelms TC, Swartz L (2013) When perhaps the real problem is money itself! The practical materiality of bitcoin. Soc Semiot 23(2):261–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mist (2017) Mist browser—the tool of choice to browse and use apps. https://github.com/ethereum/mist
  45. Nakamoto (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash systemGoogle Scholar
  46. Nofer M, Gomber P, Hinz O, Schiereck D (2017) Blockchain. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(3):183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Dwyer KJ, Malone D (2014) Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In: 25th IET Irish signals systems conference (ISSC) and China-Ireland international conference on information and communications technologies (CIICT), pp 280–285Google Scholar
  48. Pagano M, Jappelli T (1993) Information sharing in credit markets. J Financ 48(5):1693–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson JR, Schneider HS (2014) Adverse selection in the used-car market: evidence from purchase and repair patterns in the consumer expenditure survey. RAND J Econ 45(1):140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raskin M, Yermack D (2016) Digital currencies, decentralized ledgers, and the future of central banking. Working Paper 22238, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  51. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. SKAT (2016) Smart properties: trading cars. https://magic.piktochart.com/output/14349797-smart-properties
  53. Szabo N (1994) Smart contracts. http://szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html
  54. Tirole J (2012) Overcoming adverse selection: how public intervention can restore market functioning. Am Econ Rev 102(1):29–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tran B, Xu X, Weber I, Staples M, Rimba P (2017) Regerator: a registry generator for blockchain. In: CAiSE Forum and Doctoral Consortium Papers, pp 81–88Google Scholar
  56. Truffle (2017) Your Ethereum Swiss Army Knife. http://truffleframework.com/
  57. Walsh C, O’Reilly P, Gleasure R, Feller J, Li S, Christoforo J (2016) New kid on the block: a strategic archetypes approach to understanding the Blockchain. In: 37th International conference on information systems (ICIS)Google Scholar
  58. Wilson C (1980) The nature of equilibrium in markets with adverse selection. Bell J Econ 11(1):108–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolinsky A (1983) Prices as signals of product quality. Rev Econ Stud 50(4):647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wood G (2017) Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf
  61. Wörner D, von Bomhard T, Schreier YP, Bilgeri D (2016) The Bitcoin ecosystem: disruption beyond financial services? In: 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS)Google Scholar
  62. Xu X, Pautasso C, Liming Z, Gramoli V, Ponomarev A, Chen S (2016) The blockchain as a software connector. In: 13th Working IEEE/IFIP conference on software architecture (WICSA)Google Scholar
  63. Xu X, Weber I, Staples M, Zhu L, Bosch J, Bass L, Pautasso C, Rimba P (2017) A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design. In: IEEE international conference on software architecture (ICSA), pp 243–252Google Scholar
  64. Zhang Y, Wen J (2017) The iot electric business model: using blockchain technology for the internet of things. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 10(4):983–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zyskind G, Nathan O, Pentland AS (2015) Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. In: IEEE security and privacy workshops (SPW), pp 180–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedikt Notheisen
    • 1
  • Jacob Benjamin Cholewa
    • 2
  • Arun Prasad Shanmugam
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Information Systems and MarketingKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark
  3. 3.Digital Innovation and ManagementIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark

Personalised recommendations