Advertisement

Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 111–114 | Cite as

Massive Open Online Courses

  • Jochen WulfEmail author
  • Ivo Blohm
  • Jan Marco Leimeister
  • Walter Brenner
Catchword

Massive Open Online Courses—The Democratization of Education?

The Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) is one of the world’s leading universities in computer science education. Starting from 2014’s winter term, Georgia Tech is providing a Master’s program in Computer Science. Individual courses are offered exclusively as “massive open online courses” (MOOCs).1 The tuition fees will cover only a fraction of the traditional Master’s program in order to enhance accessibility. To realize this project, Georgia Tech is cooperating with AT&T and the private educational organization Udacity.2AT&T supports the program with 2 million USD. The telecommunication company uses the program for educating its own members of staff as well as for recruiting highly skilled graduates. With MOOCs for up to 300,000 participants, Udacity has gained global media attraction. Top German universities, e.g., Freiburg, Munich, and Berlin, have already started to accept some Udacity-MOOCs in their...

Keywords

Business Model Educational Service Blended Learning Georgia Tech Business Model Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blohm I, Leimeister JM (2013) Gamification – Gestaltung IT-basierter Zusatzdienstleistungen zur Motivationsunterstützung und Verhaltensänderung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 55(4):275–278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clow D (2013) MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proc 3rd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK ’13), New York, pp 185–189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper S, Sahami M (2013) Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM 56(2):28–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuseo J (2007) The empirical case against large class size: adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. Journal of Faculty Development 21(1):5–21 Google Scholar
  5. Haake J, Schwabe G, Wessner M (eds) (2012) CSCL-Kompendium 2.0: Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen, 2nd edn. Oldenbourg, München Google Scholar
  6. Kop R (2011) The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(3):18–38 Google Scholar
  7. Kop R, Hill A (2008) Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? IRRODL 9(3) Google Scholar
  8. Leimeister JM (2012) Dienstleistungsengineering und -management. Springer, Heidelberg CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin F (2012) Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM 55(8):26–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McAuley A, Stewart B, Siemens G, Cormier D (2010) The MOOC model for digital practice. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf. Accessed 2013-07-05
  11. Reichwald R, Piller F (2009) Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Gabler, Wiesbaden CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson R (2001) Calibrated Peer Review™: an application to increase student reading & writing skills. American Biology Teacher 63(7):474–480 Google Scholar
  13. Sadlar P, Good E (2006) The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment 11(1):1–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Google Scholar
  15. Vardi MY (2012) Will MOOCs destroy academia? Communications of the ACM 55(11):5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wegener R, Leimeister JM (2012) Virtual learning communities: success factors and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4(5/6):383–397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wegener R, Menschner P, Leimeister JM (2012) Design and evaluation of a didactical service blueprinting method for large scale lectures. In: Proc international conference on information systems (ICIS), Orlando Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Wulf
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ivo Blohm
    • 1
  • Jan Marco Leimeister
    • 2
    • 3
  • Walter Brenner
    • 1
  1. 1.IWI-HSGUniversität St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Chair for Information SystemsUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Information ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations