Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 89–101 | Cite as

Internet Social Networking

Research State of the Art and Implications for Enterprise 2.0
State of the Art

Abstract

An overview of the literature on Internet social networking (ISN) is presented. The authors identify four dominant streams of research and review the key contributions to the field. The review reveals that the research field is fragmented and does not yet facilitate a general understanding of the phenomenon. In particular research is very much skewed towards certain user groups (e.g., students) and platforms (in particular Facebook). Further, implications for a corporate context are discussed. In doing so, three contexts of application are differentiated: Social network sites (SNSs) for 1) recruiting and professional career development, 2) relationship facilitation in distributed work contexts, and 3) interactions with end customers. The authors discuss SNS potentials, implications of existing ISN research and future research opportunities. In summary, they seek to contribute to a better understanding of the phenomenon of ISN and to making available the current state of ISN research for the wider Enterprise 2.0 community.

Keywords

Enterprise 2.0 Internet social networking Social software 

Supplementary material

12599_2011_151_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (115 kb)
(PDF 115 KB)

References

  1. Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4258:36–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahonen TT, Moore A (2005) Communities dominate brands. Futuretext, London Google Scholar
  3. Avram G (2006) At the crossroads of knowledge management and social software. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 4(1):1–10 Google Scholar
  4. Bächle M (2006) Social Software. Informatik-Spektrum 29(2):121–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes SB (2006) A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) Google Scholar
  6. Beer D (2008) Social network(ing) sites...revisiting the story so far: a response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(2):516–529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkman R (2008) The art of strategic listening: finding market intelligence through blogs and other social media. Paramount, Ithaca Google Scholar
  8. Boyd D (2006a) Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday 11(12) Google Scholar
  9. Boyd D (2006b) The significance of social software. In: Burg TN, Schmidt J (eds) Blogtalks reloaded: social software research & cases. Books on Demand, Norderstedt Google Scholar
  10. Boyd D (2007) Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed) Teenage social life. Youth, identity and digital media. MIT Press, New York, pp 119–142 Google Scholar
  11. Boyd D, Ellison N (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1):210–230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd D, Heer J (2006) Profiles as conversation: networked identity performance on Friendster. In: Proc Hawai’i international conference on system sciences (HICSS-39). Kauai Google Scholar
  13. Breu K, Hemingway CJ (2004) Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams. J Inform Technol 19(3):191–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. British Office of Communication (2008) Social networking – a quantitative and qualitative research report into attitute, behaviours and use. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/socialnetworking/. Accessed 2010-11-08
  15. Buffardi LE, Campbell WK (2008) Narcissism and social networking web sites. Pers Soc Psychol B 34(10):1303–1304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bultje R, van Wijk J (1998) Taxonomy of virtual organisations, based on definitions, characteristics and typology. VoNet Newsletter 2(3):7–21 Google Scholar
  17. Bumgarner BA (2007) You have been poked: exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday 12(11) Google Scholar
  18. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  19. Byrne DN (2007) Public discourse community concerns, and civic engagement: exploring black social networking traditions on blackplanet.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1):319–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carroll KS (2008) Puerto Rican language use on MySpace.com. Centro Journal 20(1):96–111 Google Scholar
  21. Carton L, Wellman B (1999) Studying on-line social networks. In: Jones S (ed) Doing internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the net. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 75–105 Google Scholar
  22. Choi JH (2006) Living in CyWorld: Contextualising cy-ties in South Korea. In: Bruns A, Jacobs J (eds) Use of blogs (digital formation). Peter Lang, New York, pp 173–186 Google Scholar
  23. Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S (2009) Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12(3):341–345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chun H, Kwak H, Eom YH, Ahn YY, Moon S, Jeong H (2008) Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction: a case study of CyWorld. In: Proc 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on internet measurement, pp 57–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clemons EK, Barnett S, Appadurai A (2007) The future of advertising and the value of social network websites: some preliminary examinations. In: Proc 9th international conference on electronic commerce. Minneapolis, pp 267–276 Google Scholar
  26. Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living. Harvard University Press, Boston Google Scholar
  27. Davenport TH (2008) Enterprise 2.0: The new, new knowledge management? http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/davenport/2008/02/enterprise_20_the_new_new_know_1.html. Accessed 2010-11-08
  28. DiMicco J, Millen DR, Geyer W, Dugan C, Brownholtz B, Muller M (2008) Motivations for social networking at work. In: Proc ACM 2008 conference on computer supported cooperative work. San Diego, pp 711–720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DiMicco JM, Millen DR (2007) Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook. In: Proc 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work. New York, pp 383–386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Donath J, Boyd D (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technol J 22(4):71–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drucker PF (2000) Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. Calif Manage Rev 41(2):79–94 Google Scholar
  32. Dwyer C (2007) Digital relationships in the ’MySpace’ generation: results from a qualitative study. In: Proc Hawai’i international conference on system sciences (HICSS-40). Waikoloa, pp 317–326 Google Scholar
  33. Ermecke R, Mayrhofer P, Wagner S (2009) Agents of diffusion – insights from a survey of Facebook users. In: Proc Hawai’i international conference on system sciences (HICSS-42). Waikoloa, pp 1–10 Google Scholar
  34. Evans DC, Gosling SD, Carroll A (2008) What elements of an online social networking profile predict target-rater agreement in personality impressions? In: Proc International conference on weblogs and social media. Seattle, pp 1–6 Google Scholar
  35. Farzan R, DiMicco JM, Brownholtz B (2009) Spreading the honey: a system for maintaining an online community. In: Proc ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work. Sanibel Island, pp 31–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fogg B, Iizawa D (2008) Online persuasion in Facebook and Mixi: a cross-cultural comparison. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5033:35–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fono D, Raynes-Goldie K (2006) Hyperfriends and beyond: friendship and social norms on LiveJournal. In: Consalvo M, Haythornthwaite C (eds) Selected papers from the Association of Internet Researchers conference 2005. Peter Lang, New York, pp 91–104 Google Scholar
  38. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor, New York Google Scholar
  39. Gosling SD, Gaddis S, Vazire S (2007) Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles. In: Proc international conference on weblogs and social media. Boulder, pp 26–28 Google Scholar
  40. Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theor 1:201–233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the Facebook case). In: Proc 2005 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society. Alexandria, pp 71–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. GroßT, Koch M (2007) Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Oldenbourg, München CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2008) Personal information of adolescents on the internet: a quantitative content analysis of MySpace. J Adolescence 31(1):125–146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hippner H (2006) Bedeutung, Anwendungen und Einsatzpotentiale von Social Software. HMD – Praxis der WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 43(252):6–16 Google Scholar
  45. Introna LD (2001) Recognising the limits of virtual organizations. In: Hunt B, Barnes S (eds) E-commerce and v-business. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 268–278 Google Scholar
  46. Jones S, Millermaier S, Goya-Martinez M, Schuler J (2008) Whose space is MySpace? A content analysis of MySpace profiles. First Monday 13(9) Google Scholar
  47. Klein S, Köhne F, Totz C (2004) Extending customer’s roles in eCommerce – promises, challenges and some findings. In: Shaw MJ (ed) Electronic commerce and the digital economy. Sharpe, Armonk Google Scholar
  48. Klein S, Totz C (2004) Prosumers as service configurators – vision, status and future requirements. In: Preissl B, Bouwman H, Steinfield C (eds) E-life after the dot com bust. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 119–135 Google Scholar
  49. Koch M, Richter A (2007) Enterprise 2.0: Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenbourg, München Google Scholar
  50. Krasnova H, Hildebrand T, Günther O, Kovrigin A, Nowobilska A (2008) Why participate in an online social network? An empirical analysis. In: Proc 16th European conference on information systems. Galway, pp 2124–2135 Google Scholar
  51. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2006) A face(book) in the crowd: social searching vs. social browsing. In: Proc 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work. Banff, pp 167–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2007) A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. In: Proc SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York, pp 435–444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee A, Bruckman A (2007) Judging you by the company you keep: dating on social networking sites. In: Proc 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work. Sanibel Island, pp 371–378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lenhart A, Madden M (2007) Social networking websites and teens: an overview. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/198/report_display.asp. Accessed 2010-11-08
  55. Lewis K, Kaufman J, Christakis N (2008) The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(1):79–100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Livingstone S (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society 10(3):393–411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McAfee A (2006a) Enterprise 2.0, version 2.0. http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/enterprise_20_version_20/. Accessed 2010-11-08
  58. McAfee AP (2006b) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review 47(3):21–28 Google Scholar
  59. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. Siam Review 45(2):167–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 2010-11-08
  61. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J (2008) MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 11(2):169–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richter A, Kneifel D, Ott F (2009a) Fallstudie: Social Networking bei Accenture. Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management 1(1):78–81 Google Scholar
  63. Richter A, Koch M (2009) Zum Einsatz von Social Networking Services im Unternehmen. In: Proc Internationale Konferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. Vienna, pp 851–860 Google Scholar
  64. Richter A, Koch M, Jahnke I, Bullinger A, Stocker A, Graz KC (2009b) Tagungsband zum Workshop: Enterprise 2.0-Web 2.0 im Unternehmen. Logos, Berlin Google Scholar
  65. Richter A, Riemer K (2009) Corporate social networking sites – modes of use and appropriation through co-evolution. In: Proc ACIS international conference on computer and information science. Melbourne, pp 722–732 Google Scholar
  66. Richter D, Riemer K, vom Brocke J, Große Böckmann S (2009c) Internet social networking – distinguishing phenomenon and practical manifestation. In: Proc 17th European conference on information systems. Verona, pp 2603–2614 Google Scholar
  67. Riemer K, Klein S (2008) Is the v-form the next generation organisation? An analysis of challenges, pitfalls and remedies of ICT-enabled virtual organisations based on social capital theory. J Inform Technol 23(3):147–162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosen C (2007) Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. The New Atlantis 17(1):15–31 Google Scholar
  69. Schaefer C (2008) Motivations and usage patterns on social network sites. In: Proc 16th European conference on information systems. Galway, pp 2088–2099 Google Scholar
  70. Schumacher J, Feurstein K (2007) Living Labs – the user as co-creator. In: Proc 13th international conference on intelligent communities for Europe. Lingen, pp 27–32 Google Scholar
  71. Session LF (2009) “You looked better on MySpace”. Deception and authenticity on the Web 2.0. First Monday 14(7) Google Scholar
  72. Skeels MM, Grudin J (2009) When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In: Proc ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work. Sanibel Island, pp 95–104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steinfield C, DiMicco JM, Ellison N, Lampe C (2009) Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In: Proc fourth international conference on communities and technologies. University Park, pp 245–254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steinfield C, Ellison NB, Lampe C (2008) Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol 29(6):434–445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stutzman F (2006) An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association 3(1):10–18 Google Scholar
  76. Thew D (2008) LinkedIn – a user’s perspective: using new channels for effective business networking. Business Information Review 25(2):87–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tong ST, Van der Heide B, Langwell L, Walther JB (2008) Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3):531–549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tufekci Z (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. B. Sci Technol Soc 28(1):20–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vie S (2008) Digital Divide 2.0: “generation M” and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Media Convergence 25(1):9–23 Google Scholar
  80. vom Brocke J, Richter D, Riemer K (2009a) Motives for using social network sites (SNSs) – an analysis of SNS adoption among students. In: Proc 22nd Bled eConference. Bled, pp 40–56 Google Scholar
  81. vom Brocke J, Simons A, Niehaves B, Riemer K, Plattfaut R, Cleven A (2009b) Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proc 17th European conference on information systems. Verona, pp 3226–3238 Google Scholar
  82. Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Hamel LM, Shulman HC (2009) Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: a test of warranting theory using Facebook. Commun Res 36(2):229–253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Kim SY, Westerman D, Tong ST (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep? Hum Commun Res 34(1):28–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  85. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ (2008) How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics 121(2):350–357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput Hum Behav 24(5):1816–1836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik und InterorganisationssystemeUniversität MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Discipline of Business Information Systems Business SchoolThe University of SydneyNSWAustralia
  3. 3.Hilti Chair of Business Process Management Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein

Personalised recommendations