Critical Success Factors of Service Orientation in Information Systems Engineering

Derivation and Empirical Evaluation of a Causal Model
Research Paper

Abstract

Service orientation has been a major buzz-word in recent years. While the buzz is on a decline, organizations are slowly, but steadily moving towards service oriented designs. However, service orientation turns out to be as much of a managerial challenge as of a technical one. The most important complexity drivers in the service oriented design of information systems seem to be (a) inconsistent design goals of stakeholders and (b) the pursuit of exhaustive service orientation coverage. This research focuses on the following two questions: (1) What are the characteristics of successful implementations of service oriented information systems, and (2) what are the critical success factors influencing, driving and/or, determining these characteristics? Data of an empirical analysis is used to test a set of cause-effect relationship hypotheses based on nine latent variables. In the core of this model we differentiate the variables “overall service orientation infrastructure success” and “service orientation project success”. The hypothesized interrelationships between the nine variables lead to a causal model which is proven to hold.

Keywords

Critical success factors Service orientation Information systems integration Structural equation model 

References

  1. Ahsan M, Ye-Ngo L (2005) The relationship between I.T. Infrastructure and strategic agility in organizations. In: Romano NC Jr (eds) Proc of the eleventh Americas conference on information systems. Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp 415–427 Google Scholar
  2. Aier S, Bucher T, Winter R (2010) Indicators for measuring critical success factors of service orientation – A literature analysis. Institute of Information. Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen Google Scholar
  3. Aier S, Winter R (2009) Virtual decoupling for IT/Business alignment – conceptual foundations, architecture design and implementation example. Business & Information Systems Engineering 51(2):150–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antikainen J, Pekkola S (2009) Factors influencing the alignment of SOA development with business objectives. In: Newell S, Whitley E, Pouloudi N, Wareham J, Mathiassen L (eds) Proc of the 17th European conference on information systems Google Scholar
  5. Bacon CJ, Fitzgerald B (2001) A systemic framework for the field of information systems. ACM SIGMIS Database 32(2):46–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1):74–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bieberstein N, Bose S, Walker L, Lynch A (2005) Impact of service-oriented architecture on enterprise systems, organizational structures, and individuals. IBM Systems Journal 44(4):691–708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookes CHP, Grouse PJ, Jeffrey DR, Lawrence MJ (1982) Information systems design. Prentice–Hall, Sydney Google Scholar
  9. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 295–336 Google Scholar
  10. Chin WW (2001) PLS graph user’s guide – Version 3.0. Soft Modeling, Inc. Google Scholar
  11. Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy 14(5):235–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coronado MAE, Lyons AC, Kehoe DF (2004) Assessing the value of information systems in supporting agility in high-tech manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24(12):1219–1246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation – reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Google Scholar
  14. DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research 3(1):60–95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success – a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9–30 Google Scholar
  16. Eldrege N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115 Google Scholar
  17. Fiedler FE (1964) A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1:149–190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flores F, Ludlow J (1980) Doing and speaking in the office. In: Fick G, Spraque JH (eds) Decision support systems: issues and challenges. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 95–118 Google Scholar
  19. Gefen D, Straub DW (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph – tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the AIS 16(5):91–109 Google Scholar
  20. Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudrau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression – guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS 4(7):1–77 Google Scholar
  21. Gericke A, Klesse M, Winter R, Wortmann F (2010) Success factors of application integration: an exploratory analysis. Communications of the AIS 27:677–694 Google Scholar
  22. Gersick CJG (1991) Revolutionary change theories: a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review 16(1):10–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon, Boston Google Scholar
  24. Heutschi R, Legner C (2007) SOA adoption in practice – findings from early SOA implementations. In: Proc of the 15th European conference on information systems Google Scholar
  25. Hevner AR (2007) A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2):87–92 Google Scholar
  26. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1):75–105 Google Scholar
  27. Hochstein A, Brenner W (2006) Implementation of service-oriented it management: an empirical study on swiss it organizations. In: Proc of the international conference on service systems and service management, pp 91–97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holland CP, Light B (1999) A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software 16(3):30–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IEEE (2000) IEEE recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems (IEEE Std 1471–2000) Google Scholar
  30. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5):759–779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klose K, Knackstedt R, Beverungen D (2007) Identification of services – a stakeholder-based approach to SOA development and its application in the area of production planning. In: Proc of the 15th European conference on information systems. Google Scholar
  32. Lam W (2005) Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration – a case-driven analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 14(2):175–187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work: modeling, communication and analysis. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  34. Lee JH, Shim HJ, Kim KK (2010) Critical success factors in SOA implementation: an exploratory study. Information Systems Management 27(2):123–145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loch CH, Huberman BA (1999) Punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Science 45(2):160–177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller D, Friesen PH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 23(4):591–614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nah FFH, Lau JLS, Kuang J (2001) Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal 7(3):285–296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Puschmann T, Alt R (2004) Enterprise application integration systems and architecture – the case of the Robert Bosch Group. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17(2):105–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review 57(2):81–93 Google Scholar
  40. Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: an empirical test. Academy of Management Journal 37(5):1141–1166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27(2):237–263 Google Scholar
  42. Schelp J, Winter R (2007) Towards a methodology for service construction. In: Proc of the 40th Hawaii international conference on systems sciences (HICSS-40). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, p 64a (61–67) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (1996) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah Google Scholar
  44. Schwinn A, Winter R (2007) Success factors and performance indicators for enterprise application integration. In: Lam W, Shankararaman V (eds) Enterprise architecture and integration. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 23–39 Google Scholar
  45. Slevin DP, Pinto JK (1987) Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation. Sloan Management Review 29(1):33–41 Google Scholar
  46. Sneed HM, Brössler P (2003) Critical success factors in software maintenance: a case study. In: Proc of the international conference on software maintenance (ICSM’03), pp 190–198 Google Scholar
  47. Somers TM, Nelson K (2001) The impact of critical success factors across the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations. In: Sprague RH (ed) 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos Google Scholar
  48. Stal M (2006) Using architectural patterns and blueprints for service-oriented architecture. IEEE Software 23(2):54–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sumner M (2000) Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects. Journal of Information Technology 15(4):317–327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tatnall A, Davey B, McConville D (1996) Information systems: design and implementation, 3nd edn. Data Publishing, Melbourne Google Scholar
  51. The Open Group (2009) TOGAF Version 9 – The open group architecture framework (TOGAF). The Open Group Google Scholar
  52. Themistocleous M, Irani Z (2001) Benchmarking the benefits and barriers of application integration. Benchmarking 8(4):317–331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tolbert P, Zucker LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly 28:22–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Umapathy K, Purao S (2007) A theoretical investigation of the emerging standards for web services. Information Systems Frontiers 9(1):119–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vessey I, Galletta D (1991) Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Information System Research 2(1):63–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vessey I, Ramesh V, Glass RL (2002) Research in information systems: an empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2):129–174 Google Scholar
  57. Weill P, Ross J (2004) IT Governance – how top performers manage IT. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Google Scholar
  58. Winter R, Fischer R (2007) Essential layers artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(2):7–18 Google Scholar
  59. Wold H (1985) Partial least squares. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol 6. Wiley, New York, pp 581–591 Google Scholar
  60. Wong-Bushby I, Egan R, Isaacson C (2006) A case study in SOA and re-architecture at company ABC. In: Proc of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations