Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 19–31 | Cite as

Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers

Research Paper

Abstract

The market for the new provisioning type Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has reached a significant size and still shows enormous growth rates. By varying size of SaaS products, providers can improve their market position and profits by successfully acting in the tension area of customer acquisition, pricing and costs. We first elaborate differences concerning product differentiation between classic software provisioning models and SaaS. Then, we introduce a micro-economic based decision model to maximize the return of a provider by finding an optimal granularity, i.e. by varying the size of services. This paper makes two contributions in this context: (1) it provides a conceptual foundation for product differentiation within the scope of SaaS and (2) it presents the first implementation of variable reproduction costs for web based software offers. The model is illustrated by a real world case with data from a SaaS provider.

Keywords

Software-as-a-Service Product differentiation Service granularity Decision model 

References

  1. Albani A, Keiblinger A, Turowski K, Winnewisser C (2003) Domain based identification and modelling of business component applications. In: Proc ADBIS, pp 30–45 Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht AJ (1979) Measuring application development productivity. In: Proc IBM applications development symposium Google Scholar
  3. Anderson C (2006) The long tail. Hyperion, New York Google Scholar
  4. Arsanjani A, Ghosh S, Allam A, Abdollah T, Ganapathy S, Holley K (2008) SOMA: a method for developing service-oriented solutions. IBM Systems Journal 47(3):377–396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker RD, Datar SM, Kemerer CF (1991) A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects. Man Sci 37(1):1–18 Google Scholar
  6. Benlian A (2009) A transaction cost theoretical analysis of software-as-a-service (SAAS)-based sourcing in SMBS and enterprise. In: Proc 17th European conference on information systems, Verona Google Scholar
  7. Benlian A, Hess T, Buxmann P (2009) Drivers of SaaS-adoption – an empirical study of different application types. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(5):357–369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2001) Information goods and vertical differentiation. J Manage Inf Syst 18(2):89–106 Google Scholar
  9. Bhargava HK, Sun D (2008) Pricing under quality of service uncertainty: market segmentation via statistical QoS guarantees Eur J Oper Res 191(3):1189–1204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boerner R, Goeken M (2009) Identification of business services – literature review and lessons learned. In: Proc 15th Americas conference on information systems, San Francisco Google Scholar
  11. Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2005) Managing piracy: pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Information Systems Research 16(4):400–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng HK, Tang QC (2010) Free trial or no free trial: optimal software product design with network effects. Eur J Oper Res 205(2):437–447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng HK, Tang QC, Zhao JL (2006) Web services and service-oriented application provisioning: an analytical study of application service strategies. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(4):520–533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choudhary V, Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rajan U (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Man Sci 51(7):1120–1130 Google Scholar
  15. Cremer H, Thisse JF (1991) Location models of horizontal differentiation: a special case of vertical differentiation models. The Journal of Industrial Economics 39(4):383–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erl T (2005) Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice, Upper Saddle River Google Scholar
  17. Fan M, Kumar S, Whinston AB (2009) Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):661–671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gartner (2009) Market trends: software as a service worldwide 2009–2013 Google Scholar
  19. Ghose A, Sundararajan A (2005) Software versioning and quality degradation? An exploratory study of the evidence. Working paper, New York University Google Scholar
  20. Haesen R, Snoeck M, Lemahieu W, Poelmans S (2008) On the definition of service granularity and Its Architectural Impact. In: Proc 20th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, Montpellier, pp 375–389 Google Scholar
  21. Heinrich B, Fridgen M (2005) Enterprise application integration. BARev 65(1):43–61 Google Scholar
  22. Holschke O, Rake J, Levina O (2009) Granularity as a cognitive factor in the effectiveness of business process model reuse. In: Proc 7th international conference on business process management, Ulm Google Scholar
  23. Jing B (2000) Versioning information goods with network externalities. In: Proc 21st international conference on information systems, Brisbane Google Scholar
  24. Jones C (2007) Estimating software costs. McGraw-Hill, New York Google Scholar
  25. Jones R, Mendelson H (2005) Information goods: development, quality and competition. Discussion paper, Stanford University Google Scholar
  26. Kaplan JM (2007) SaaS: friend or foe? Business Communications Review 37(6):48–53 Google Scholar
  27. Kim SD, Chang SH (2004) A systematic method to identify software components. In: Proc 11th Asia-Pacific software engineering conference, Busan Google Scholar
  28. Krafzig D, Banke K, Slama D (2005) Enterprise SOA – service-oriented architecture best practices. Prentice, Upper Saddle River Google Scholar
  29. Lee KB, Yu S, Kim SJ (2006) Analysis of pricing strategies for e-business companies providing information goods and services. Comput Ind Eng 51(1):72–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmann S, Buxmann P (2009) Pricing strategies of software vendors. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(6):452–462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mietzner R, Leymann F (2008) Towards provisioning the cloud: on the usage of multi-granularity flows and services to realize a unified provisioning infrastructure for Saas applications. In: Proc 2008 IEEE congress on services, Hawaii Google Scholar
  32. Nault BR (1997) Quality differentiation and adoption costs: the case for interorganizational information system pricing. Ann Oper Res 71:115–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papazoglou MP, van den Heuvel W (2007) Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. The VLDB Journal 16(3):389–415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Papazoglou MP, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F (2007) Service-oriented computing: state of the art and research challenges. IEEE Computer 40(11):38–45 Google Scholar
  35. Parnas DL (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. ComACM 15(12):1053–1058 Google Scholar
  36. Phillips DE (2009) The software license unveiled: how legislation by license controls software access. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  37. Raghunathan S (2000) Software editions: an application of segmentation theory to the packaged software market. J Manage Inf Syst 17(1):87–113 Google Scholar
  38. Sääksjärvi M, Lassila A, Nordström H (2005) Evaluating the software as a service business model: from CPU time-sharing to online innovation sharing. In: Proc IADIS international conference e-society, Malta, pp 177–186 Google Scholar
  39. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Versioning: the smart way to sell information. Harv Bus Rev 76(6):106–114 Google Scholar
  40. Simon CP, Blume L (1994) Mathematics for economists. Norton, New York Google Scholar
  41. Susarla A, Barua A, Whinston AB (2009) A transaction cost perspective of the “software as a service” business model. J Manage Inf Syst 26(2):205–240 Google Scholar
  42. Szyperski CA (1998) Emerging component software technologies: a strategic comparison. Software – Concepts and Tools 19(1):2–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Valente P, Mitra G (2007) The evolution of web-based optimisation: from ASP to e-services. Decis Support Syst 43(4):1096–1116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varian HR (1997) Versioning information goods. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley Google Scholar
  45. Varian HR (2000) Buying sharing and renting information goods. The Journal of Industrial Economics 48(4):473–488 Google Scholar
  46. Varian HR (2009) Intermediate microeconomics. Norton, New York Google Scholar
  47. Walsh KR (2003) Analyzing the application ASP concept: technologies, economies, and strategies. Commun ACM 46(8):103–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang ZJ, Xu X, Zhan D (2005) A survey of business component identification methods and related techniques. International Journal of Information Technology 2(4):229–238 Google Scholar
  49. Weber TA (2001) Mixed differentiation of information goods under incomplete information. In: Proc 22nd international conference on information systems, New Orleans Google Scholar
  50. Weber TA (2008) Delayed multiattribute product differentiation. Decis Support Syst 44(2):447–468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wei X, Nault BR (2006) Vertically differentiated information goods: entry deterrence, rivalry clear-out or coexistence. In: Proc 2006 INFORMS conference on information systems and technology, Pittsburgh Google Scholar
  52. Zhang J, Seidmann A (2002) The optimal software licensing policy under quality uncertainty. In: Proc 23rd international conference on information systems, Barcelona Google Scholar
  53. Zhang Z, Tan Y, Dey D (2009) Price competition with service level guarantee in web services. Decis Support Syst 47(2):93–104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FIM Research Center Finance & Information ManagementUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations