Advertisement

Rare Metals

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Microstructure and mechanical properties of two-stage aged Al–Cu–Mg–Ag–Sm alloy

  • Wen-Long Zhang
  • Dai-Hong Xiao
  • Ting Li
  • Jian-Di Du
  • Dong-Yan Ding
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

High-strength Al–Cu–Mg–Ag–Sm alloy was fabricated and subjected to single-stage aging and pre-aging (two-stage aging). Effect of pre-aging on microstructure and mechanical properties of the alloy was investigated. It is found that the alloy is mainly composed of α-Al, Al2Cu, Al2CuMg and AlCu4Sm. The number of plate-like Ω Al2Cu precipitates is comparable to that of rod-like S Al2CuMg precipitates in the single-stage aged alloy, whereas, in the two-stage aged alloy, it is much higher than that of S precipitates. Ω precipitates have a smaller plate thickness and distribute more uniformly in the two-stage aged alloy than in the single-stage aged alloy. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and yield strength of the two-stage aged alloy are 12% higher than those of the single-stage aged one, indicating a better aging hardening caused by the two-stage aging. The increased tensile properties mainly come from both stronger precipitation strengthening caused by more Ω precipitates in the two-stage aged alloy and stronger solution strengthening from Mg atoms. The fracture surfaces consist of both dimple zones composed of microscale dimples and platform zones composed of nanoscale dimples. The total area of dimple zones for single-stage aged alloy is much higher than that for two-stage aged alloy, which can be attributed to different numbers of Ω precipitates in the two alloys.

Keywords

Rare earth aluminum alloy Aging behavior Tensile property Fractography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51171108) and the Open Research Fund of Science and Technology on High Strength Structural Materials Laboratory, Central South University, China.

References

  1. [1]
    Wang SC, Starink MJ. Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al–Cu–Mg–(Li) based alloys. Int Mater Rev. 2005;50(4):193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Liu JT, Zhang YA, Li XW, Li ZH, Xiong BQ, Zhang JS. Phases and microstructures of high Zn-containing Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Rare Met. 2016;35(5):380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chakrabarti DJ, Laughlin DE. Phase relations and precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys with Cu additions. Prog Mater Sci. 2004;49(3–4):389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Polmear IJ, Pons G, Barbaux Y, Octor H, Sanchez C, Morton AJ, Borbidge WE, Rogers S. After Concorde: evaluation of creep resistant Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 1999;15(8):861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lin XY, Pan QL, Lu ZL, Cao SF, He YB, Li WB. Effects of solution treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Mater Des. 2010;31(9):4392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ringer SP, Sakurap T, Polmear IJ. Origins of hardening in aged Al–Cu–Mg–(Ag) alloys. Acta Mater. 1997;45(9):3731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hutchinson CR, Fan X, Pennycook SJ, Shiflet GJ. On the origin of the high coarsening resistance of Ω plates in Al–Cu–Mg–Ag Alloys. Acta Mater. 2001;49(14):2827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wang SC, Starink MJ, Gao N. Precipitation hardening in Al–Cu–Mg alloys revisited. Scr Mater. 2006;54(2):287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Roshan MR, Jenabali Jahromi SA, Ebrahimi R. Predicting the critical pre-aging time in ECAP processing of age-hardenable aluminum alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2011;509(30):7833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liu XY, Pan QL, Zhang XL, Liang SX, Zheng LY, Gao F, Xie HL. Effects of stress-aging on the microstructure and properties of an aging forming Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Mater Des. 2014;58:247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bakavos D, Prangnell PB, Bes B, Eberl F. The effect of silver on microstructural evolution in two 2xxx series Al-alloys with a high Cu:Mg ratio during ageing to a T8 temper. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;491(1–2):214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Song YF, Ding XF, Xiao LR, Zhao XJ, Cai ZY, Guo L, Li YW, Zheng ZZ. Effects of two-stage aging on the dimensional stability of Al–Cu–Mg alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2017;701:508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Aruga Y, Kozuka M, Takaki Y, Sato T. Formation and reversion of clusters during natural aging and subsequent artificial aging in an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;631:86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Aruga Y, Kozuka M, Takaki Y, Sato T. Evolution of solute clustering in Al–Cu–Mg alloys during secondary ageing. Acta Mater. 2010;58(5):1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Li Z, Xiong B, Zhang Y, Zhu B, Wang F, Liu H. Investigation of microstructural evolution and mechanical properties during two-step ageing treatment at 115 and 160 °C in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy pre-stretched thick plate. Mater Charact. 2008;59(3):278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Stiller K, Warren PJ, Hansen V, Angenete J, Gjønnes J. Investigation of precipitation in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy after two-step ageing treatment at 100 and 150 °C. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;270(1):55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Chemingui M, Khitouni M, Jozwiak K, Mesmacque G, Kolsi A. Characterization of the mechanical properties changes in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy after a two-step ageing treatment at 70 and 135 °C. Mater Des. 2010;31(6):3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lumley RN, Morton AJ, Polmear IJ. Enhanced creep performance in an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy through underageing. Acta Mater. 2002;50(14):3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Somoza A, Macchi CE, Lumley RN, Polmear IJ, Dupasquier A, Ferragut R. Role of vacancies during creep and secondary precipitation in an underaged Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Phys Stat Sol. 2007;4(10):3473.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ferragut R, Dupasquier A, Macchi CE, Somoza A, Lumley RN, Polmear IJ. Vacancy–solute interactions during multiple-step ageing of an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Scr Mater. 2009;60(3):137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Zhang J, Ding D, Xu X, Gao Y, Chen G, Chen W, You X, Huang Y, Tang J. Effect of Ce addition on the mechanical and electrochemical properties of a lithium battery shell alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2014;617:665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Du JD, Ding DY, Xu Z, Zhang JC, Zhang WL, Gao YJ, Chen GZ, Chen WG, You XH, Chen RZ, Huang YW, Tang JS. Effect of CeLa addition on the microstructures and mechanical properties of Al–Cu–Mn–Mg–Fe alloy. Mater Charact. 2017;123:42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Xiao DH, Huang BY. Effect of Yb addition on precipitation and microstructure of Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloys. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China. 2007;17(6):1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Wang WT, Zhang XM, Gao ZG, Jia YZ, Ye LY, Zheng DW, Liu L. Influences of Ce addition on the microstructures and mechanical properties of 2519A aluminum alloy plate. J. Alloys Comp. 2010;491(1–2):366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Fang HC, Chao H, Chen KH. Effect of Zr, Er and Cr additions on microstructures and properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;610:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Shi Y, Pan Q, Li M, Huang X, Li B. Effect of Sc and Zr additions on corrosion behaviour of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2014;612:42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Xiao DH, Song M, Chen KH, Huang BY. Effect of rare earth Yb addition on mechanical properties of Al–5.3Cu–0.8Mg–0.6Ag alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2007;23(10):1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Xiao DH, Song M, Huang BY, Yi JH, He YH, Li YM. Effect of Sc addition on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu–Mg–Ag–Zr alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2009;25(6):747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Li BQ, Wawner FE. Dislocation interaction with semicoherent precipitates (Ω phase) in deformed Al–Cu–Mg–Ag. Acta Mater. 1998;46(15):5483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Ringer SP, Hono K, Polmear IJ, Sakurai T. Nucleation of precipitates in aged Al–Cu–Mg–(Ag) alloys with high Cu:Mg ratios. Acta Mater. 1996;44(5):1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Bai S, Liu Z, Zhou X, Xia P, Zeng S. Mg-controlled formation of Mg–Ag co-clusters in initial aged Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2014;602:193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Gazizov M, Kaibyshev R. Effect of pre-straining on the aging behavior and mechanical properties of an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;625:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Gupta AK, Gaunt P, Chaturvedi MC. The crystallography and morphology of the S’-phase precipitate in an Al(CuMg) alloy. Philos Mag A. 1987;55(3):375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Gazizov M, Kaibyshev R. The precipitation behavior of an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy under ECAP. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;588:65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Gazizov M, Kaibyshev R. Effect of over-aging on the microstructural evolution in an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy during ECAP at 300 °C. J Alloys Compd. 2012;527:163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Wang SC, Starink MJ. Two types of S phase precipitates in Al–Cu–Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2007;55(3):933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Charai A, Walther T, Alfonso C, Zahra AM, Zahra CY. Coexistence of clusters, GPB zones, S″-, S′- and S-phases in an Al–0.9% Cu–1.4% Mg alloy. Acta Mater. 2000;48(10):2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Zhen L, Kang SB. The effect of pre-aging on microstructure and tensile properties of Al–Mg–Si alloys. Scr Mater. 1997;36(10):1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Khan IN, Starink MJ, Yan JL. A model for precipitation kinetics and strengthening. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;472(1–2):66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nonferrous Metals Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Materials Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Science and Technology on High Strength Structural Materials LaboratoryCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations