Advertisement

OPSEARCH

pp 1–33 | Cite as

A priority based unbalanced time minimization assignment problem

  • Ekta Jain
  • Kalpana DahiyaEmail author
  • Vanita Verma
Theoretical Article

Abstract

This paper discusses a priority based unbalanced time minimization assignment problem which deals with the allocation of n jobs to \(m~(<n)\) persons such that the project is executed in two stages, viz. Stage-I and Stage-II. Stage-I is composed of \(n_1(<m)\) primary jobs and Stage-II is composed of the remaining \((n-n_1)\) secondary jobs which are commenced only after Stage-I jobs are completed. Each person has to do at least one job whereas each job is to be assigned to exactly one person. It is assumed that the nature of primary jobs is such that one person can perform exactly one job whereas a person is free to perform more than one job in Stage-II. Also, persons assigned to primary jobs cannot perform secondary jobs. In a particular stage, all persons start performing the jobs simultaneously. However, if a person is performing more than one job, he does them one after the other. The objective of the proposed study is to find the feasible assignment that minimizes the overall completion time (i.e., the sum of Stage-I and Stage-II time) for the two stage implementation of the project. In this paper, an iterative algorithm is proposed that solves a constrained unbalanced time minimization assignment problem at each iteration and generates a pair of Stage-I and Stage-II times. In order to solve this constrained problem, a solution strategy is developed in the current paper. An alternative combinations based method to solve the priority based unbalanced problem is also analysed and a comparative study is carried out. Numerical demonstrations are provided in support of the theory.

Keywords

Assignment Time minimization Unbalanced Priority Constrained 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments which helped in improving the manuscript considerably. The first author is thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (Sanction No. 09/135/(0724)/2015-EMR-I) for providing financial support for carrying out this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal, V.: The assignment problem under categorized jobs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 14, 193–195 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal, V., Tikekar, V.G., Hsu, L.F.: Bottleneck assignment problems under categorization. Comput. Oper. Res. 13(1), 11–26 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arora, S., Puri, M.C.: A variant of time minimizing assignment problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 110, 314–325 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatia, H.L.: Time minimizing assignment problem. SCIMA 6(3), 75–83 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandt, A., Intrator, Y.: The assignment problem with three job categories. Cas. Pro Pest. Mat. 96, 8–11 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burkard, R.E., Rendl, F.: Lexicographic bottleneck problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 10, 303–308 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carpaneto, G., Toth, P.: Algorithm for the solution of the bottleneck assignment problem. Computing 27, 179–187 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen, R., Katzir, L., Raz, D.: An efficient approximation for the generalized assignment problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 100(4), 162–166 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derigs, U.: Alternate strategies for solving bottleneck assignment problems: analysis and computational results. Computing 33(2), 95–106 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleischer, L., Goemans, M.X., Mirrokni, V.S., Sviridenko, M.: Tight approximation algorithms for maximum general assignment problems. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, pp 611–620 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frieze, A.M., Yadagar, J.: On the quadratic assignment problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 5, 89–98 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garfinkel, R.S.: An improved algorithm for the bottleneck assignment problem. Oper. Res. 19, 1747–1751 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gevezes, T.P., Pitsoulis, L.S.: A new greedy algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. Optim. Lett. 7, 207–220 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghose, S.: The maximum capacity routes: a lexisearch approach. Opsearch 8(3), 209–225 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gross, O.: The Bottleneck Assignment Problem. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, Technical report P-1630 (1959)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horowitz, E., Sahni, S.: Exact and approximate algorithms for scheduling non identical processors. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 23, 317–327 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iampang, A., Boonjing, V., Chanvarasuth, P.: A cost and space efficient method for unbalanced assignment problems. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Macao, pp 985–988 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaur, P., Sharma, A., Verma, V., Dahiya, K.: A priority based assignment problem. Appl. Math. Model. 40(7), 7784–7795 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuhn, H.W.: The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 2, 83–97 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuhn, H.W.: Variants of the Hungarian method for assignment problems. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 3, 253–258 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar, A.: A modified method for solving the unbalanced assignment problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 176, 76–82 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lawler, E.L.: The quadratic assignment problem. Manag. Sci. 9(4), 586–599 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawler, E.L., Lenstra, J.K., Kan, A.H.G.R., Schmoys, D.B.: Sequencing and scheduling: algorithms and complexity. Handb. OR MS 4, 445–522 (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Malhotra, R., Bhatia, H.L.: Variants of the time minimization assignment problem. Trabajos De Estadistica Y De Investigacian Operativa 35(3), 331–338 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munkres, J.: Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 5(1), 32–38 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pandit, S.N.N., Murthy, M.S.: Allocation of sources and destinations. In: \(8^{th}\) Annual Convention of Operational Research Society of India, pp 22–24 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pandit, S.N.N., Subrahmanyam, Y.V.: Enumeration of all optimal job sequence. Opsearch 12(1–2), 35–39 (1975)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pferchy, U.: Solution methods and computational investigations for the linear bottleneck assignment problem. Computing 59, 237–258 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ravindran, A., Ramaswamy, V.: On the bottleneck assignment problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 21(4), 451–458 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sahni, S., Gonzalez, T.: P-complete approximation problems. J. ACM 23(3), 555–565 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sahu, A., Tapadar, R.: Solving the assignment problem using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. In: IMECS, pp 762–765 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seshan, C.R.: Some generalizations of time minimizing assignment problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 32, 489–494 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sonia, Puri, M.C.: Two stage time minimizing assignment problem. Omega 36, 730–740 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Subrahmanyam, Y.V.: Some special cases of assignment problems. Opsearch 16(1), 45–47 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.University Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations