Advertisement

OPSEARCH

pp 1–29 | Cite as

A demand aggregation approach for inventory control in two echelon supply chain under uncertainty

  • Peeyush Vats
  • Gunjan SoniEmail author
  • Ajay Pal Singh Rathore
  • Surya Prakash Yadav
Technical Note
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper it is discussed that the demand aggregation is an effective approach for reducing inventory levels and the number of facilities under the uncertain supply and demand conditions. Therefore in this paper, an inventory control model is developed incorporating demand aggregation approach for two staged supply chain distribution network under uncertain demand conditions. The two stage of distribution network mainly consists of distributors and retailers. This inventory control model is developed as non-linear programming model with in the different alternatives of distribution networks. The main decision variables of the system are reorder point and the ordering quantity. The prime objective function in this paper is the total cost of system which mainly consists of ordering cost, inventory carrying cost, facility cost, facility operating cost and the cost of shipment. The model is solved for total cost minimization which provides the optimum inventory policy (reorder point and ordering quantity) and the minimum cost. Through this problem best alternative of distribution network is also suggested along with optimum reorder point, ordering quantity and total cost of the system. Some other vital inventory performance parameters besides of ordering quantity and reorder point are also evaluated for the system. These performance parameters are safety stocks, expected shortages per cycle, fill rates, cycle service level, average inventory etc. These performance parameters are evaluated with total cost of the system under different uncertainty levels for a desired service level. This problem also yielded the best network options in given uncertain conditions of demand and supply. This model is formulated for single product and single period. This study mainly focused on the small part of supply chain i.e. distribution network for implementing demand aggregation approach. A case study of a sugar mill distribution network has been performed for validating the industrial applications of the proposed model.

Keywords

Demand aggregation Inventory Two stage supply chain Safety stock Inventory level Uncertainty 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, P.: Effect of uncertain and turbulent environment on organizational design. Econ. Bus. J. Enq. Perspect. 5(1), 11–24 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angkiriwang, R., Pujawan, I.N., Santosa, B.: Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs. proactive approaches. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2(1), 50–70 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anupindi, R., Bassok, Y.: Centralization of stocks: retailers vs. manufactures. Manag. Sci. 45(2), 178–191 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold, J.R.T.: Introduction to Materials Management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernstein, F., Decroix, G.A., Wang, Y.: The impact of demand aggregation through delayed component in an assemble to order system. Manag. Sci. 57(6), 1154–1171 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bragila, M., Frosolini, M.: Virtual pooled inventories for equipment-intensive industries: an implementation in a paper district. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 112, 26–37 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Constantin, A.: Inventory management, service level and safety stock. J. Public Adm. Finance Law X(6), 145–153 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christopher, M.: Logistic and Supply Chain Management. Pitman Pub, London (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charles, J.C., Kumar, R.: A generalization of inventory pooling effect to nonnormal dependent demand. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 8(4), 351–358 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chopra, S., Meindl, P., Kalra, D.V.: Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and operations, 5th edn, pp. 337–344. Pearson Education Inc., London (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dang, V.T.: Effects of component commonality in multi-component inventory models. OPSEARCH 37(4), 294–315 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dai, Y., Fang, S.-C., Ling, X., Nuttle, H.L.W.: Risk pooling strategy in multi-echelon supply chain with price sensitive demand. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 67(3), 391–421 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eppen, G.D.: Effects of centralization on expected costs in multi-location newsboy problem. Manag. Sci. 5(5), 498–501 (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eppen, G., Scharge, L.: Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand. In: Schwarz, L.B. (ed.) Multi-level Production/Inventory System: Theory and Practice, pp. 51–67. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Etienne, E.C.: Supply chain responsiveness and the inventory illusion. Supply Chain Forum 6(1), 48–65 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eynan, A., Fouque, T.: Benefiting from risk pooling effects: internal (component commonality) vs external (demand reshape) efforts. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 1(1), 90–99 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferrer, G.: Open architecture, inventory pooling and maintenance modules. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 128, 393–403 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ganeshan, R.: Managing supply chain inventories: a multiple retailer, one warehouse, multiple supplier model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 59(1–3), 341–354 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaur, S., Ravindran, A.R.: A bi-criteria model for inventory aggregation problem under risk pooling. Comput. Ind. Eng. 51, 482–501 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerchak, Y., He, Q.M.: On the relation between the benefits of risk pooling and variability of demand. IIE Trans. 35(11), 1027–1031 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Govindan, K., Fattahi, Md, Keyvanshokooh, E.: Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 263(1), 108–141 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamath, B.N., Bhattacharya, S.: Integrated inventory model for similar products under a two-echelon supply chain environment: an empirical Study. OPSEARCH 43(4), 331–357 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kang, J.H., Kim, Y.D.: Inventory control in a two level supply chain with risk pooling effect. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135, 116–124 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, H.L., Billington, C.: Managing supply chain inventories: opportunities and pitfalls. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 33(3), 65–74 (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin, C.T., Chen, C.B., Hsieh, H.J.: Effects of centralization on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(7), 839–841 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liao, S.-H., Hsieh, C.-L., Lai, P.-J.: An evolutionary approach for multi-objective optimization of the integrated location—inventory distribution network problem in vendor-managed inventory. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(6), 6768–6776 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oeser, G.: Risk pooling in business logistics. In: Deshmukh S. G. (eds.) Risk-Pooling Essentials. Springer Briefs in Business. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ouyang, L.-Y., Chang, H.C.: Mixture inventory model involving setup cost reduction with service level constraints. OPSEARCH 37(4), 327–339 (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pal, S., Manna, D.K.: A marketing decision problem in single period stochastic inventory model. OPSEARCH 40(3), 230–240 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prakash, S., Kumar, S., Soni, G., Jain, V., Rathore, A.P.S.: Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 5(3), 1–28 (2018)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prakash, S., Soni, G., Rathore, A.P.S.: A grey based approach for assessment of risk associated with facility location in global supply chain. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 5(3), 419–436 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reddy, G.S.N., Sarma, K.V.S.: A periodic review inventory problem with variable stock dependent demand. OPSEARCH 38(3), 332–341 (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Routroy, S., Kodali, R.: Differential evolution algorithm for supply chain inventory planning. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 16(1), 7–17 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schmitt, A.J., Sun, S.A., Synder, L.V., Shen, Z.J.: Centralization vs decentralization: risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions. Omega 52, 201–212 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shi, J., Zhao, Y.: Component commonality under no hold-back allocation rules. Oper. Res. Lett. 42, 409–413 (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sobel, M.J.: Risk pooling. In: Chhajed, D., Lowe, T.J. (eds.) Building Institution, pp. 155–174. Springer, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Synder, L.V., Daskin, M., Teo, C.P.: The stochastic location model with risk pooling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179, 1221–1238 (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takai, S., Sengupta, S.: An approach to evaluate the probability of component commonality. J. Mech. Des. 139(7), 74501–74507 (2017)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vats, P., Soni, G., Rathore, A.P.S., Purohit, J.K.: Risk pooling approach in multi-product multi-period inventory control model under uncertainty. In: 2018 International Conference on Production and Operations Management Society (POMS) (2018)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wazed, MdA, Ahmed, S., Nukman, Y.: Commonality in manufacturing resource planning issues and models: a review. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 4(2), 167–188 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.: Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50, 2–18 (1991)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weng, Z.K.: Risk-pooling over demand uncertainty in the presence of product modularity. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62, 75–85 (1999)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu, K., Evers, P.T.: Managing single echelon inventories through demand aggregation and the feasibility of correlation matrix. Comput. Oper. Res. 30, 297–308 (2003)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang, H., Scharge, L.: Conditions that cause risk pooling to increase inventory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(3), 837–851 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peeyush Vats
    • 1
  • Gunjan Soni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ajay Pal Singh Rathore
    • 1
  • Surya Prakash Yadav
    • 2
  1. 1.Malaviya National Institute of TechnologyJaipurIndia
  2. 2.School of Engineering and TechnologyBML Munjal UniversityGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations