Advertisement

OPSEARCH

pp 1–43 | Cite as

Modeling the public distribution system: a PO-P approach

  • Ajay Bohtan
  • K. MathiyazhaganEmail author
  • Prem Vrat
Application Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Public distribution system (PDS) is the lifeline of food security in India which involves provisioning of foodgrains. To manage this supply chain more efficiently, an effective performance management system is a pre-requisite. This paper utilises the performance objectives-productivity approach to formalise a performance measurement methodology for the PDS supply chain of foodgrains at state level. Here, the actual values of the performance measures are compared with the objectivated values to arrive at the productivity index which indicates the degree of performance of PDS and its various components. In this model the optimal values of the “objectivated output” can be obtained either by solving a goal programming model or through benchmarking in the multi attribute utility theory framework. As fast movement of foodgrains is vital to reduce the degree of perishability due to losses during transit and storage, this multi-dimensional performance measurement system also rates the losses of foodgrains during various stages of freight transportation with a view to minimise the same. The primary aim in applying this method is to arrive at a benchmarking technique to assess if such supply chain is working effectively and efficiently which is akin to auditing the system. By using the given approach some standardisation could be brought into arrive at the authentic performance level of the PDS.

Keywords

Supply chain management Public distribution system Performance measurement system Performance objectives-productivity 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to put on record their deep appreciation for the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and relevant suggestions which has led to the improvement in the quality and content of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Tarozzi, A.: The Indian public distribution system as provider of food security: evidence from child nutrition in Andhra Pradesh. Eur. Econ. Rev. 49, 1305–1330 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Government of India.: Mid Term Appraisal of 11th Five-Year Plan 2007–12. Planning Commission (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Government of India.: Report of the Expert Committee on National Food Security Bill (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Association for Protection of Civil Rights.: Public Distribution System in India: A Brief Overview, Preliminary Document, Version 0.0 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohtan, A., Vrat, P., Vij, A.K.: Supply chain of the Indian public distribution system: a new paradigm. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 14(1), 110–123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rajkumar, P.: Service quality measurement of the public distribution system in the food grains supply chain. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model. 5(2), 131–147 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhagwat, R.O., Raut, D.N.: The performance evaluation of public distribution system using exploratory factor analysis. J. Harm. Res. Eng. 4(3), 76–83 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vrat, P., Sardana, G.D.: Concept of productivity: a plea for reappraisal. Udyog Pragati VIII(1), 16–24 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sardana, G.D., Vrat, P.: An MBO based mathematical model for measuring plant productivity. In: Proceedings, All India Seminar on Productivity Maximisation in Industries, Institution of Engineers (India), Calcutta (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sardana, G.D., Vrat, P.: Performance objective-productivity (PO-P): a conceptual framework and mathematical model for productivity management. Productivity XXIV(3), 299–307 (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sardana, G.D., Vrat, P.: Models of productivity measurement- survey and critical appraisal. In: Reading Material, APO Seminar on Productivity Measurement and Analysis. National Productivity Council, New Delhi (1984)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sardana, G.D., Vrat, P.: Models of productivity measurement-survey and critical appraisal. Productivity XXV(3), 271–289 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K.: Performance measurement system design—a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 15(4), 80–116 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tangen, S.: An overview of frequently used performance measures. Work Study 52(7), 347–354 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osborne, D., Gaebler, E.: Reinventing Government—How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Propper, C., Wilson, D.: The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. CMPO Working Paper Series No. 03/073. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.148.448&rep=rep1&type=pdf Accessed 21 Dec 2017
  17. 17.
    Osbourne, S., Bovaird, T., Martin, S., Tricker, M., Waterson, P.: Performance management and accountability in complex public programmes. Financ. Account. Manag. 11, 19–37 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharifi, S., Bovaird, T.: The financial management initiative in the UK public sector—the symbolic role of performance reporting. Int. J. Public Adm. 18, 467–490 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pidd, M.: Measuring the Performance of Public Services-Principle and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kendrik, J.W., Creamer, D.: Measuring Company Productivity. Handbook with Case Studies. National Conference Board, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramsay, M.R.: Overall productivity measurement. In: Paper presented at World Productivity Conference. Indian Institution of Industrial Engineering, Bombay (1973)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mali, P.: Improving Total Productivity-MBO Strategies for Business, Government and Not-For-Profit Organisations. Wiley, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson, R.A., Kast, F.E., Rosenzweig, J.E.: The Theory and Management of System. Mc Graw Hill Kogakusha Ltd, Tokyo (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scharf, A.D.: Productivity and problem solving—don’t collect data first. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference. Institute of Industrial Engineers, Chicago (1984)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22(11), 1222–1245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ambekar, S., Kapoor, R., Mehta, P.: Structural mapping of public distribution system using multi-agent systems. Bus. Process Manag. J. 21(5), 1066–1090 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2014-0081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swaminathan, M.: Consumer food subsidies in India: proposals for reform. J. Peasant Stud. 27(3), 92–114 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramaswami, B.: Efficiency and equity of food market interventions. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 37(123), 1129–1135 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mane, P.: Targeting the poor or poor targeting: a case for strengthening the public distribution system of India. J. Asian Afr. Stud. 41(4), 299–317 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kattumuri, R.: Food security and the targeted public distribution system in India. Asia Research Centre Working Paper No. 38. http://www.lse.ac.uk/asiaResearchCentre/_files/ARCWP38-Kattumuri.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
  31. 31.
    Nagavarapuy, S., Sekhriz, S.: Who is targeted by India’s targeted public distribution system? Working paper. Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/group/SITE/archive/SITE_2011/2011_segment_2/2011_segment_2_papers/nagavarapu.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  32. 32.
    Nagavarapuy, S., Sekhriz, S.: Informal monitoring mechanisms in public service delivery: evidence from the public distribution system in India. Working paper. Virginia University. http://people.virginia.edu/~ss5mj/UP_TPDS.pdf.Accessed 23 Dec 2017
  33. 33.
    Murthy, R.V., Ramanayya, T.V.: Procurement policy for Food Corporation of India modifications and implications. IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 250. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2147608. Accessed 23 Dec 2017
  34. 34.
    Jha, S., Ramaswami, B.: The percolation of public expenditure: food subsidies and the poor in India and the Philippines. Paper presented at NCAER-NBER: India Policy Forum, New Delhi, India (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khera, R.: India’s public distribution system: utilisation and impact. J. Dev. Stud. 47(7), 1038–1060 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Basu, K.: India’s foodgrain policy: an economic theory perspective. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 46(5), 37–46 (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thaller, C., Moraitakis, N., Rogers, H., Sigge, D., Clausen, U., Pfohl, H.C., Hartmann, E, Hellingrath, B.: Analysis of the logistics research in India—White Paper. http://web.iitd.ac.in/~ravi1/4a_White%20Paper%20Logistics%20Research%20in%20India%20%282%29.pdf (2012). Accessed 23 Dec 2017
  38. 38.
    Shah, J.: Supply Chain Management-Text and Cases. Pearson Education Ltd, London (2009). ISBN 978-81-317-1517-8Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sink, D.S., Tuttle, T.C.: Planning and measurement of your organization of the future. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross (1989)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Keegan, D.P., Eiler, R.G., Jones, C.R.: Are your performance measures obsolete? Manag. Account. 71, 45–50 (1989)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: Measuring performance in a changing business environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 23(2), 213–229 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J., Vollmann, T.E.: The New Performance Challenge—Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1990)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ghalayini, A.M., Noble, J.S.: The changing basis of performance measurement. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 16(8), 63–80 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    De Toni, A., Tonicha, S.: Manufacturing flexibility—a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 36(6), 1587–1617 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70(1), 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Atkinson, A., Waterhouse, J., Wells, R.: A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(3), 5 (1997)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lindner, C.: Supply chain performance measurement—a research of occurring problems and challenges. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:221082/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  48. 48.
    European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM).: An overview of the EFQM excellence model. http://www.efqm.org/sites/default/files/overview_efqm_2013_v1.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
  49. 49.
    Ahmed, A.H.: Virtual integrated performance measurement. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 19(4), 414–441 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Supply Chain Operation Research (SCOR).: https://www.scor.com/en. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  51. 51.
    Vrat, P.: Materials Management—An Integrated Systems Approach. Springer, New Delhi (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Allard, R., Keal, J.E., Mount, W., Samuel, P.J., Smith, G.R., Swanack, A.R.: Productivity Measurement—A Symposium for the Seventies. Institute of Personal Management, London (1971)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S., McDevitt, L.: Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 17(5), 522–534 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vrat, P., Sardana, G.D., Sahay, B.S.: Productivity Measurement for Business Excellence. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi (2009)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aramyan, L.H., Lansink, A.G.O., Van Der Vorst, J.G., Van Kooten, O.: Performance measurement in agri-food supply chains—a case study. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 12(4), 304–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jha, S., Ramaswami, B.: How can food subsidies work better? Answers from India and the Philippines. ADB Economics Working Paper Series. 221 (2010)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ahluwalia, D.: Public distribution of food in India. Food Policy 8(1), 33–54 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ramaswami, B., Balakrishnan, P.: Food prices and the efficiency of public intervention: the case of the public distribution system in India. Food Policy 27(5), 419–436 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jha, R., Bhattacharyya, S., Gaiha, R.: Social safety nets and nutrient deprivation—an analysis of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Program and the Public Distribution System in India. J. Asian Econ. 22(2), 189–201 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Coates, J.: Build it back better: deconstructing food security for improved measurement and action. Glob. Food Secur. 2(3), 188–194 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cummings Jr., R., Rashid, S., Gulati, A.: Grain price stabilisation experiences in Asia: What have we learned? Food Policy 31(4), 302–312 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., Macnaughton, S.: Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 365, 3065–3081 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cavinato, J.L.: Total cost value model for supply chain competitiveness. J. Bus. Logis. 13(2), 285–291 (1992)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stewart, G.: Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logist. Inf. Manag. 8(2), 38–44 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Naim, M.M.: The book that changed the world. Manuf. Eng. 76, 13–16 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Benjamin, R., Wigand, R.: Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the information superhighway. Sloan Manag. Rev. 36(2), 62–72 (1997)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Novich, N.: Distribution strategy: Are you thinking small enough? Sloan Manag. Rev. 32(1), 71–77 (1990)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thomas, D.J., Griffin, P.M.: Coordinated supply chain management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 94(3), 1–15 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lee, H.L., Billington, C.: Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Manag. Rev. 33, 65–73 (1992)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Van Hoek, R.I., Harrison, A., Christopher, M.: Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21(1/2), 126–147 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Slack, N., Chambers, S., Johnston, R.: Operations Management, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, London (2001)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    PDS Portal of India.: https://pdsportal.nic.in/main.aspx. Accessed 24 Dec 2017
  73. 73.
    Farmer’s Portal.: http://farmer.gov.in/. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  74. 74.
    Commission for Agricultural Costs & Practises.: http://cacp.dacnet.nic.in/. Accessed 23 Dec 2017
  75. 75.
    Directorate of Economics and Statistics.: http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/. Accessed 24 Dec 2017
  76. 76.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1, 39–71 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kumar, S.: Report of the high-level committee on reorienting the role and restructuring of Food Corporation of India. Government of India, Planning Commission report (2015)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Treasury, H.M.: Cabinet Office, National Audit Office, Audit Commission, Office for National Statistics.: Choosing the Right FABRIC—A Framework for Performance Information. London: TSO; 2001. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/fabric.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2018
  79. 79.
    El Turabi, A., Hallsworth, M., Ling, T., Grant, J.: A novel performance monitoring framework for health research systems-experiences of the National Institute for Health Research in England. Health Res. Policy Syst. 9, 13 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Government of Australia, Performance Unit, Cabinet Services, Department of the Premier and Cabinet.: Performance Management Framework: Measuring, Monitoring and Reporting Performance—Reference Guide (2017). https://www.forgov.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/measuring-monitoring-reporting-performance.pdf Accessed 13 Sep 18

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Northcap UniversityGurugramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity School of Engineering and TechnologyAmity UniversityNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations