Advertisement

OPSEARCH

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Identifying defective network components through restricted group testing

  • Diptesh GhoshEmail author
Application Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a network of switches in which some of the switches may malfunction. Our aim is to find out efficiently (a) if any of the switches in a network of switches are defective, and (b) if there are defective switches, to identify those switches. We find an optimal solution for the first problem and a heuristic solution to the second, and demonstrate the feasibility of our approach through computational experiments.

Keywords

Switch networks Node covering Group testing s-t Cuts Heuristics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Nilotpal Chakravarti for introducing him to the problem and for many fruitful discussions on the problem.

References

  1. 1.
    Azwell, T., Blum, M.J., Hare, A., Joye, S., Kubendran, S., Laleian, A., Lane, G., Meffert, D.J., Overton, E.B., Thomas III, J., White, L.E.: The Macondo Blowout Environmental Report. Deepwater Horizon Study Group Environmental Report (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balding, D.J., Bruno, W.J., Knill, E., Torney, D.C.: A comparative survey of non-adaptive pooling designs. In: Speed T., Waterman, M.S. (eds.) Genetic mapping and DNA sequencing, pp. 133–154. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications Book Series (IMA, vol. 81) Springer, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babarczi, P., Tapolcai, J., Ho, P.-H.: Adjacent link failure localization with monitoring trails in all-optical mesh networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19, 907–920 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheraghchi, M., Karbasi, A., Mohajer, S., Saligrama, V.: Graph-constrained group testing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 58, 248–262 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Du, D.-Z., Hwang, F.: Combinatorial Group Testing and Its Applications. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyachkov, A.G., Rykov, V.V.: A survey of superimposed code theory. Probl. Control. Inf. Theory 12, 229–242 (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoshino, E.A.: The minimum cut cover problem. Electron. Notes Discret. Math. 37, 255–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karbasi, A., Zadimoghaddam, M.: Sequential group testing with graph constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), pp. 292–296 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, C.H.: A sequential method for screening experimental variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57, 455–477 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loulou, R.: Minimal cut cover of a graph with an application to the testing of electronic boards. Oper. Res. Lett. 12, 301–305 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motwani, R., Naor, J.: On exact and approximate cut covers of graphs. Technical report STAN-CS-TN-94-11, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tapolcai, J., Wu, B., Ho, P.-H., Rónyai, L.: A novel approach for failure localization in all-optical mesh networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19, 275–285 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.P&QM AreaIndian Institute of Management AhmedabadAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations