Advertisement

Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers Selection by Cross-Species Amplification in Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus asiae)

  • Priyanka Negi
  • Pramesh Lakhera
Short Communication
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The cross-species amplification is an effective method in obtaining microsatellite loci for genetic studies of closely related species. In this study, the cross-species amplified markers were characterized and selected for black francolin (Francolinus francolinus asiae). It is a ground dwelling game bird. In this study total eight markers were cross-species amplified. These eight markers were selected from chicken. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 21. The observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.022 to 0.98 and the expected heterozygosity from 0.23 to 0.79. There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium among the pair of loci. These loci were polymorphic and offered valuable tool for genetic diversity and population genetic studies of black francolin.

Keywords

Black francolin Galliformes Genetic diversity Microsatellite Polymorphism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Authors gratefully acknowledge the University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi for providing UGC BSR Fellowship (No. F.7-77/2007/BSR) and Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi for Bioinformatics Centre.

References

  1. Ali, S., and S.D. Ripley. 1983. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan, Compact ed. Delhi: Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. AVIANDIV, Weigend, S. (Coordinator), M.A.M. Groenen et al. (1998–2000). Development of strategy and application of molecular tools to assess biodiversity in chicken genetic resources. EC Contract No. BI04-CT98-0342 (1998–2000); http://aviandiv.tzv.fal.de/primer_table.html.
  3. Baratti, M., A. Alberti, T. Veenendaal, and F.D. Fulgheri. 2001. Polymorphic microsatellites developed by cross-species amplifications in common pheasant breeds. Animal Genetics 32: 222–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. FAO/MoDAD. 2004. Secondary guidelines. Measurement of domestic animal diversity (MoDAD): Recommended microsatellite markers. Available at http://fao.org/dad-is.
  5. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (version 2.9.3.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. The Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang, Zuhao, and Liao Xinjun. 2010. Cross-species amplification and characterization of microsatellite DNA loci from Gallus gallus in Bambusicola thoracica. Chinese Birds 1 (1): 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalinowski, S.T., M.L. Taper, and T.C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kayang, B.B., M.I. Murayama, T. Hoshi, K. Matsuo, H. Takahashi, M. Minezawa, M. Mizutani, and Ito Shinichi. 2002. Microsatellite loci in Japanese quail and cross species amplification in chicken and guinea fowl. Genetics Selection Evolution 34: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Litt, M., and J.A. Luty. 1989. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by invitro amplification of dinucleotide repeats within the cardiac muscle actin gene. The American Journal of Human Genetics 44: 397–401.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. McGowan, P.J.K., and G.M. Kirwan. 2015. Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. and de Juana, E. (eds.), Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona (Retrieved from http://www.hbw.com/node/53386. Accessed 1 October 2015.
  11. Mukesh, T., I.D. Rai, R.P. Mandhan, and S. Sathyakumar. 2011. A panel of polymorphic microsatellite markers in Himalayan monal Lophophorus impejanus developed by cross-species amplification and their applicability in other Galliformes. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57: 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peakall, R., and P.E. Smouse. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Reed, K.M., K.M. Mendoza, and C.W. Beattie. 2000. Comparative analysis of microsatellite loci in chicken and turkey. Genome 43: 796–802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rousset, F. 2008. Genepop: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source of polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 6463–6471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhou, X., Y. Xu, J. Ran, B. Yue, L. Cao, and J. Li. 2009. Polymorphic microsatellites in Buff-throated partridge developed by cross-species amplification. European Journal of Wildlife Research 55: 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Zoological Society, Kolkata, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.H.N.B, Garhwal UniversitySrinagar GarhwalIndia

Personalised recommendations