Proceedings of the Zoological Society

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 20–26 | Cite as

Influence of Physicochemical Parameters on the Abundance of Coliform Bacteria in an Industrial Site of the Hooghly River, India

  • Shraddha Basu
  • Tuhin Banerjee
  • Pankaj Manna
  • Banjul Bhattacharyya
  • Bibhas Guha
Research Article


Industrial effluents from jute, paper, pulp mills and sewage from households are regularly discharged into the Hooghly River. It generates a potential risk for both humans and animals of the area concerned. In the present study, water quality of the Hooghly River passing by the site of a growing township (Naihati, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India) was assessed throughout the year 2010 on the basis of the data collected on the physicochemical and microbiological parameters. The water samples collected on each month revealed the presence of higher amount of coliform bacteria, Streptococcus sp. and Escherichia coli, than the standard limit. Different physicochemical parameters like chemical oxygen demand, biological oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen (DO), total suspended solids, total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness, alkalinity, chlorinity, nitrate and nitrite of the water at the sampling sites were found to be considerably higher than the levels standardized by WHO (2006). It was found that the relative abundance of Streptococcus and E. coli was influenced by two independent variables (water quality parameters), namely, DO and TDS. The abundance of coliform bacteria in the water sample warrants the adoption of proper measures to reduce the pollution level at the point source on way of scientific disposal of industrial effluents.


Hooghly River Water pollution Physicochemical parameters Coliform bacteria 



Authors are thankful to the principal and Head of the Department of Zoology of Rishi Bankim Chandra College, Naihati for providing the necessary laboratory facilities.


  1. APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bonde, G.J. 1977. Bacterial indication of water pollution. In Advances in aquatic microbiology, eds. M.R. Droop, H.W. Januasch, 273–364. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brenner, K.P., C.C. Rankin, Y.R. Roybal, G.N. Stelma Jr, P.V. Scarpino, and A.P. Dufour. 1993. New medium for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 3534–3544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandra, R., S. Singh, and A. Raj. 2006. Seasonal bacteriological analysis of gola river water contaminated with pulp paper mill waste in Uttaranchal, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 118: 393–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatterjee, S.K., I. Bhattacharjee, and G. Chandra. 2010. Water quality assessment near an industrial site of Damodar River, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 161: 177–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craun, G.F. 1978. Impact of the coliform standard on the transmission of disease. In Evaluation of the microbiology standards for drinking water, ed. C.W. Hendricks, 21–35. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Downing, A.L. 1971. Forecasting the effects of polluting discharges on natural waters-I. Rivers. The International Journal of Environmental Studies 2(1): 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPA. 2002. US Environment Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Act Ammendment. Available at
  9. Fried, J.J. 1991. Nitrates and their control in the EEC aquatic environment. In Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on nitrate contamination: Exposure, consequences, and control, 9–14 Sept 1990, Lincoln, Nebraska. NATO ASI Series: Ecological Sciences 30:3–11. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. Grant, M.A. 1997. A new membrane filtration medium for simultaneous detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and total coliform. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63: 3526–3530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guissani, B., D. Monticelli, R. Gambillara, A. Pozzi, and C. Dossi. 2008. Three way principal component analysis of chemical data from lake como watershed. Microchemical Journal 88(2): 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jain, C.K., K.K.S. Bhatia, and S.M. Seth. 1996. Characterization of waste disposals and their impacts on the water quality of river Koli. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection 17(6): 442–447.Google Scholar
  13. Jain, S.K., P.K. Agarwal, and V.P. Singh. 2007. Hydrology and water resources of India. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer (13-978-1-4020-5180-7 e-book).Google Scholar
  14. Legendre, P., B. Baleux, and M. Troussellier. 1984. Dynamics of pollution indicator and heterotrophic bacteria in sewage treatment lagoons. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48: 586–593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mcdaniels, A.E., R.H. Bordner, P.S. Gartside, J.R. Haines, K.P. Conner, and C.C. Rankin. 1985. Holding effects on coliform enumeration in drinking water samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 50: 755–762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nath, D., R.N. Misra, and H.C. Karmakar. 2005. The Hooghly estuarine system-ecological flux, fishery resources and production potential. Bulletin of Central Inlamnd Fisheries Research Institute, West Bengal, India 130: 29–30.Google Scholar
  17. Osborne, J.W. 2000. Prediction in multiple regression. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(2). Available at Accessed 6 Feb 2012.
  18. Ramanibai, R. 1996. Seasonal and spatial abundance of pollution indicator bacteria in Buckingham canal madras. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection 17(2): 110–114.Google Scholar
  19. Ramteke, P.W., S.P. Pathak, J.W. Bhattacherjee, K. Gopal, and N. Mathur. 1994. Evaluation of the presence–absence (P–A) test. A simplified bacteriological test for detecting coliform in rural drinking water of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 33: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma, S., S. Dixit, P. Jain, K.W. Shah, and R. Vishwakarma. 2008. Statistical evaluation of hydrobiological parameters of Narmada River water at Hosangabad city, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 143(1–3): 195–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shittu, O.B., J.O. Olaitan, and T.S. Amusa. 2008. Physico-chemical and bacteriological analysis of water used for drinking and swimming purposes in Abeokuta, Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research 11: 285–290.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, K.P., A. Malik, S. Sinha, and V.K. Singh. 2007. Multi-block data modeling for characterization of soil contamination: A case study. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 185: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sood, A., K.D. Singh, P. Pandey, and S. Sharma. 2008. Assessment of bacterial indicators and physicochemical parameters to investigate pollution status of Gangetic river system of Uttarakhand (India). Ecological Indicators 8(5): 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tyagi, P., D. Buddi, R. Chowdary, and R. Sawhney. 2000. Physicochemical quality of ground water in industrial areas of India. Pollution Research 19: 443–445.Google Scholar
  25. Vass, K.K., S. Samanta, V.R. Suresh, P.K. Katiha, and S.K. Mandal. 2008. Current status of River Ganges. Bulletin of Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, West Bengal, India 130: 5–6.Google Scholar
  26. Venter, S.N., M.C. Stenyberg, C.M.E. De Wet, D. Hohls, G. Du Plessis, and R. Kfir. 1997. A situational analysis of the microbial water quality in a periurban catchment in South Africa. Water Science and Technology 35(11–12): 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WBPCB. 2008. Environmental monitoring: water quality monitoring (part-II). Annual Report (2006–07) of West Bengal Pollution Control Board, Government of West Bengal, pp. 53–59.Google Scholar
  28. WHO. 2006. Guidelines for drinking water quality. First addendum to third edition (vol.1). Recommendations ISBN 924-915-4696-4694.Google Scholar
  29. Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis (4th edn.). Singapore: Pearson Education. India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Zoological Society, Kolkata, India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shraddha Basu
    • 1
  • Tuhin Banerjee
    • 1
  • Pankaj Manna
    • 1
  • Banjul Bhattacharyya
    • 2
  • Bibhas Guha
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyRishi Bankim Chandra CollegeNaihati, 24 Parganas (N)India
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural StatisticsBidhan Chandra Krishi ViswavidyalayaKalyaniIndia
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyNetaji Subhas Open UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations