Proceedings of the Zoological Society

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 96–108 | Cite as

Population Trends and Spatiotemporal Changes to the Community Structure of Waterbirds in Birbhum District, West Bengal, India

Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Waterbird assemblages on five important wetlands of Birbhum district, West Bengal, were studied for 13 years to examine the changes in the community composition of the waterbirds and to quantify their population decline during the period between 1998 and 2010. The spatiotemporal analyses revealed that the waterbird communities of these wetlands maintained high spatial but low temporal variations in their structure. Such within-wetland homogeneity was attributed to a relatively static distribution of some key resources. The spatiotemporal variations in the abundance and community structure were associated with a shift in distribution of some important winter migrants from a disturbed and deteriorating wetland to a newly built well protected one. Twenty-one species of waterbirds acted as significant indicators in structuring the waterbird communities of these wetlands, revealing their species rich nature. However, comparisons between data collected for these wetlands in 1998 and 2010 showed that notable changes in these waterbird communities have occurred over longer periods of time, with 16 of the 25 most common and important species having declined in this period indicating an overall decline by 38%. These wetlands still regularly support globally important populations of four waterbird species.

Keywords

Community structure Conservation implication Indicator species Long-term trend Waterbird decline 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by funding from University Grants Commission and we gratefully acknowledge this support. We are thankful to the Higher Education Department, Government of West Bengal, and Principal, Maulana Azad College, for allowing us to carry out this work. We also gratefully acknowledge the active cooperation of the personnel of Bakreswar Thermal Power Plant and Ballavpur Wildlife Sanctuary in carrying out this long-term study and providing important information about the wetlands and their denizens. Special thanks are due to the Post Graduate Zoology (Ecology Special Paper) students at Maulana Azad College for their active participation in survey works.

References

  1. Amat, J.A. 1995. Effects of wintering greylag geese Anser anser on their Scirpus food plants. Ecography 18: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baral, H.S., and C. Inskipp. 2004. The state of Nepal’s birds 2004. Kathmandu: Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Bird Conservation Nepal and IUCN Nepal.Google Scholar
  3. Clements, J. 2007. The Clements Checklist of the birds of the world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Day, J.H., and M.A. Colwell. 1998. Water communities in rice fields subjected to different post-harvest treatments. Colonial Waterbirds 21: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dufrene, M., and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monograph 67: 345–366.Google Scholar
  6. Elphick, C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetlands habitats. Conservation Biology 14: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elphick, C.S., and L.W. Oring. 1998. Winter management of California rice fields for waterbirds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbs, J.P. 1995. Hydrologic needs of wetland animals. In Encyclopedia of environmental biology, ed. Nierenberg, W.A., Vol. II, 267–276. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haag, K.H., J.C. Joyce, W.M. Hetrick, and J.C. Jordan. 1987. Predation on water hyacinth weevils and other aquatic insects by three wetland birds in Florida. The Florida Entomologist 70: 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kazmierczak, K. 2003. A field guide to the birds of India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. New Delhi: Om Book Service.Google Scholar
  11. Khan, T.N. 2010. Temporal changes to the abundance and community structure of migratory waterbirds in Santragachhi Lake, West Bengal, and their relationship with water hyacinth cover. Current Science 99(11): 1570–1577.Google Scholar
  12. Khan, T.N., A. Sinha, D. Basu, and S. Chakraborty. 2005. A preliminary observation of diversity and threats to the survival of migratory waterfowls in an avian abode near Kolkata. Journal of Natural History 1: 56–67.Google Scholar
  13. Kingsford, R.T., and F.I. Norman. 2002. Australian waterbirds—products of the continent’s ecology. Emu 102: 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ludwig, J.A., and J.F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Ma, Z., B. Li, B. Zhao, K. Jing, S. Tang, and J. Chen. 2004. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds?—A case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maiti, S., S. Balachandran, and S. Chaudhury. 2010. Interdependency of macrophytes and avian diversity in the wetlands of Ballavpur Wildlife Sanctuary, Santiniketan. Science and Culture 76(5–6): 180–184.Google Scholar
  17. McCune, B., and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
  18. McCune, B., and M.J. Mefford. 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 5. Gleneden Beach: MjM Software.Google Scholar
  19. Moser, M., C. Prentice, and S. Frazier. 1996. A global overview of wetland loss and degradation. In Technical Session B of the 6th Ramsar Conference of Parties, Brisbane, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
  20. Okes, N.C., P.A.R. Hockey, and G.S. Cumming. 2008. Habitat use and life history as predictors of bird responses to habitat change. Conservation Biology 22: 151–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pannekoek, J. and A. van Strien. 2001. TRIM (trends and indices for monitoring data). Vooburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS). (Research paper no. 1020).Google Scholar
  22. Paton, D.C., D.J.B. Rogers, M.C. Hill, P. Bailey, and M. Ziembicki. 2009. Temporal changes to spatially stratified waterbird communities of the Coorong, South Australia: Implications for the management of heterogenous wetlands. Animal Conservation 12: 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramachandra, T.V., and M. Solanki. 2007. Ecological assessment of lentic water bodies of Bangalore. ENVIS Technical Report No. 25.Google Scholar
  24. Rendon, M.A., A.J. Green, E. Aquilera, and P. Aalmaraz. 2008. Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south-west Spain. Biological Conservation 14: 1371–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson, J. 2002. Anas acuta. Animal Diversity Web, ed. Johansson C. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Anasacuta.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2010.
  26. Rodríguez-Pérez, H., and A.J. Green. 2006. Waterbird impacts on widgeongrass Ruppia maritima in a Mediterranean wetland: Comparing bird groups and seasonal effects. Oikos 112: 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shine, C., and C. Klemm. 1999. Wetlands, water and the law: Using law to advance wetland conservation and wise use. Gland: UICN.Google Scholar
  28. Svingen, D., and S.H. Anderson. 1998. Waterfowl management on grass-sage stock ponds. Wetlands 18: 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tourenq, C., R.E. Bennets, H. Kowalski, E. Vialet, J.-L. Licchesi, Y. Kayser, and P. Isenmann. 2001. Are rice fields a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camargue, southern France? Biological Conservation 100: 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wei, D.L.Z., A. Bloem, S. Delany, G. Martakis, and J.O. Quientero. 2009. Status of waterbirds in Asia: Results of the Asian waterbird census 1987–2007. Kuala Lumpur: Wetlands International.Google Scholar
  31. Wetlands International. 2006. Waterbird population estimates, 4th ed. Wageningen: Wetlands International.Google Scholar
  32. Woodward, R.T., and Y.S. Wui. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Zoological Society, Kolkata, India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecology and Wildlife Biology Laboratory, Department of ZoologyMaulana Azad CollegeKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations