Advertisement

Journal of the Geological Society of India

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 278–284 | Cite as

Itacolumite (Flexible Sandstone) From Kaliana, Charkhi Dadri District, Haryana, India

  • Pawan Kumar
  • Milap Chand Sharma
  • Yamuna SinghEmail author
  • Neelratan Singh
  • Pankaj Kumar
  • Sundeep Chopra
Research Articles
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study is to highlight main causes of flexibility in itacolumite from Kaliana Hills, Charkhi Dadri district, Haryana. Results of petrominerological studies, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 3D analysis of SEM images, and quantitative micro fabric analysis reveal that the intergranular void spaces are significantly higher in more flexible specimen (mean 47.68 μm) relative to less flexible specimen (mean 14.32 μm, i.e., <3 times), whereas, non-flexible sandstones show negligible intergranular void spaces (4.97-6.40 μm). Therefore, it may be envisaged that the flexibility in Kaliana itacolumite is due to the presence of more intergranular void spaces. The chemical corrosion appears to be the main reason for the formation of more void spaces in between the constituent grains in the flexible sandstones. Leaching effect on the grains is evident on scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images. These solution channels and embayment might have removed the significant amount of cementing material and silica by dissolution and solution activity. Thus, obviously, the flexibility in the itacolumite was induced by solution activity, more the solution activity, more the void spaces and hence more resultant flexibility. Almost vertically dipping beds of sandstone would have facilitated capillary movement and solutioning leading to development of concomitant leaching induced porosity.

Higher degree of flexibility in itacolumite specimen from quarry dump, compared to in-situ fresh itacolumite specimen, is apparently due to more exposure of former to surface processes like weathering, more solution activity and corrosion leading to more removal of cementing material and silica accompanied by concomitant augmentation of considerable intergranular void spaces (>3 times), relative to the latter. It is thus clear that relatively less flexibility in in-situ itacolumite is linked with its less solutioning relative to itacolumite from dump. Thermal shock resistance property of itacolumite can be used as a model material to process synthetic flexible ceramics by mixing phases with large differences of thermal expansion properties.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balfour, E. (1885) The Cyclopaedia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, 3rd ed., Morrison & Gibb, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  2. Bannister, Cowan and Company (1869) Resources of North Carolina: It’s natural wealth, condition, and advantages, as existing in 1869, Presented to the Capitalists and People of the Central and Northern States. Bannister & Cowan, Wilmington, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, W.B. (1876) On itacolumite. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, v.28, pp.325–326.Google Scholar
  4. Card, G. (1892) On the flexibility of rocks with special mention to the flexible limestone of Durham. Geol. Magz., v.9, pp.117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derby, O. A. (1882) Modes of occurrence of the diamond in Brazil. Amer. Jour. Sci., v.25, pp.34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derby, O.A. (1884) On the flexibility of itacolumite. Amer. Jour. Sci., v.28, pp.205–08.Google Scholar
  7. Derby, O. A. (1898) On the accessory elements of itacolumite, and the secondary enlargement of tourmaline. Amer. Jour. Sci., v.5, pp.187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doncieux, A., Stagnol, D., Huger, M., Chotard, T., Gault, C., Ota, T., and Hashimoto, S. (2008) Thermo-elastic behaviour of a natural quartzite: Itacolumite. Jour. Materials Sci., v.43(12), pp. 4167–4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dusseault, M. B. (1980) Itacolumite: The flexible sandstones. Quart. Jour. Engg. Geol., v.13, pp.119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fedden, F. (1877) Flexible sandstone. In: Hughes (Ed.) Wardha Valley Coal Field. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.XIII Pt. 1, pp.16.Google Scholar
  11. Ginsburg, L. and Lucas, G. (1949) Presence de quartzites elastiques dans les gres armoricains de Berrien (Finistere). Comptes Rendue, pp.1657–1658.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, W.H. (1950). Petrography of three Georgia itacolumites. Georgia Department of Mines Mining and Geology, v.56, pp.91–96.Google Scholar
  13. Hacket, C.A. (1868). On the geology of the Arvali Region, Central and Eastern. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, v.XIV, pp.279–303.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, A.C. (1951) Flexible sandstone. The Mineralogist, v.19, pp.34.Google Scholar
  15. Heusser, C. and Claraz, G. (1861) Description of the rocks in which diamonds are found and the manner of working them in the province of Minas Gerais, in Brazil. The Geologist, pp.163–8.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, J. L. (2005) The quartzite problem revisited. Jour. Geol., v.113, pp.707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerbey, H.C. (2011) Itacolumite, flexible sandstone and flexible quartzite - a review. Proc. Geol. Assoc., v.122, pp.16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Medlicott, H.B. (1874) A note on the habitat in India of the elastic sandstone, or so called itacolumyte. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, v.7, pp.30–31.Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, A. (1876) A note on itacolumite, or flexible sandstone. Proc. Liverpool Geol. Soc., no.iii, pp.148–151.Google Scholar
  20. Oldham, R.D. (1889). On flexible sandstone or itacolumite, with special reference to its nature and mode of occurrence in India, and the cause of its flexibility. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, v.XXII, pp.51–56.Google Scholar
  21. Pande, I.C. and Gupta, V.J. (1969) Flexible sandstone in the rocks of the Delhi System. Research Bulletin (N.S.), Panjab University, v.20, pp.589–90.Google Scholar
  22. Pittman, E. F. (1892) Flexible sandstone. Geol. Mag., v.9, pp.335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siegesmund, S., Volbrecht, A. and Hulka, C. (2002) The anisotropy of itacolumite flexibility. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.205, pp.137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato, I., Ichikawa, Y., Sakanoue, J., Mizutani, M., Adachi, N., and Ota, T. (2008). Flexible ceramics in the system KZr2(PO4)3 - KAlSi2O6 prepared by mimicking the microstructure of itacolumite. Jour. Amer. Ceramic Soc., v.91(2), pp.607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzuki, H. and Shimizu, D. (1993) Petrography of Indian, Brazilian and Appalachian itacolumite. Jour. Geol. Soc. Japan, v.99, pp.391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suzuki, H., Yokoyama, T. and Nishihara, M. (1993) Scanning electron microscope and acoustic emission studies of itacolumite. Jour. Geol. Soc. Japan, v.99, pp.443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verma, V.K. (1982) Flexibility in itacolumites from Brazil, India and United States. Jour. Indian Assoc. Sediment., v.3, pp.19–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geological Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pawan Kumar
    • 1
  • Milap Chand Sharma
    • 2
  • Yamuna Singh
    • 3
    Email author
  • Neelratan Singh
    • 2
  • Pankaj Kumar
    • 4
  • Sundeep Chopra
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Geography, School of Earth, Environment and Space SciencesChaudhary Bansi Lal UniversityBhiwani, HaryanaIndia
  2. 2.Jawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and ResearchBegumpet, HyderabadIndia
  4. 4.Inter-University Accelerator CentreNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations