Advertisement

Non-Impact Origin of the Baisha Structure in Hainan Province, China

  • Jiang Pu
  • Zhiyong XiaoEmail author
  • Long Xiao
  • Cheng Huang
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The Baisha Structure, with a rim-to-rim diameter of ~3.7 km, in the center of the Hainan Province, southern China has been considered to be an impact crater. Field investigation and petrological study are presented in this paper to investigate the impact hypothesis for this structure. The ~600-m-thick Lower Cretaceous feldspathic quartz sandstones from the Lumuwan Formation are the major outcrops both within and outside of the structure. The amphitheater-shaped rim of the structure is composed of granite porphyries that are intruded in the Lumuwan Formation. Previously interpreted impact breccia and impact melt rocks are actually granite porphyries different cooling rates and weathering status. Rocks from locations that most likely have recorded shock metamorphic signatures are sampled, but petrographic analyses reveal no indications of shock metamorphism. While subtle structural deformation occurs at the contact boundary between the granite porphyries and the feldspathic quartz sandstones, the feldspathic quartz sandstones exhibit uniformed dipping strata across the crater floor and walls. All the evidence suggests that the Baisha Structure was not formed by impact cratering. It most likely has been shaped by a combination of magmatic intrusion and long-term differential erosion.

Key words

impact crater shock metamorphism differential erosion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Hainan Geological Survey kindly provided support during the field trip. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41773063 and 41403053) to Zhiyong Xiao and Jiang Pu, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (Nos. CUG180601 and CUG2018JM10), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41772050) to Long Xiao, and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20171BAB213027) to Cheng Huang. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-018-0887-0.

References Cited

  1. Baratoux, D., Reimold, W. U., 2016. The Current State of Knowledge about Shatter Cones: Introduction to the Special Issue. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 51(8): 1389–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, M., Xiao, W. S., Xie, X. D., et al., 2010. Xiuyan Crater, China: Impact Origin Confirmed. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(17): 1777–1781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. French, B. M., 1998. Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Craters. LPI Contribution 954, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 120Google Scholar
  4. French, B. M., Koeberl, C., 2010. The Convincing Identification of Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures: What Works, what Doesn't, and why. Earth-Science Reviews, 98(1/2): 123–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grieve, R. A. F., Langenhorst, F., Stöffler, D., 1996. Shock Metamorphism of Quartz in Nature and Experiment: II. Significance in Geoscience. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 31(1): 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02049.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grieve, R. A. F., Robertson, P. B., Dence, M. R., 1981. Constraints on the Formation of Ring Impact Structures, Based on Terrestrial Data. In: Schultz, P. H., Merrill, R. B., eds., Multi-Ring Basins: Formation and Evolution. Proceedings of the Lunar Planet Science Conference, November 10–12, 1980, Houston, TX. Pergamon Press, New York and Oxford. 37–57Google Scholar
  7. Hergarten, S., Kenkmann, T., 2015. The Number of Impact Craters on Earth: Any Room for Further Discoveries?. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 425: 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koeberl, C., Claeys, P., Hecht, L., et al., 2012. Geochemistry of Impactites. Elements, 8(1): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.8.1.37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Langenhorst, F., Deutsch, A., 2012. Shock Metamorphism of Minerals. Elements, 8(1): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.8.1.31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Milton, D. J., MacDonald, F. A., 2005. Goat Paddock, Western Australia: An Impact Crater near the Simple-Complex Transition. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 52(4/5): 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090500170435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, D. J., Li, J., 1993. The Interpretation of Remote Sensing Image of Baisha Impact Crater and Its Verification. Geology in China, (5): 23–24, 32–33 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Wang, D. J., Wang, X. J., 1995. The Baisha Meteorite-Impacted Crater and Crater-Forming Meteorite in Hainan Island. Geological Science and Technology Information, 4: 17–21 (in Chinese with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Wang, D. J., Wang, X. J., Ding, S. J., et al., 1997. Baisha Meteorite-Impact Crater in Hainan Island. Hainan Publishing House, Haikou. 60 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Wang, X. J., 1994. Impactites of Baisha Crater in Hainan: The Preliminary Study of Geochemical Characteristics. Geology in China, (6): 21–23 (in Chinese with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Wang, X. J., 1996. The Discovery of Calcium-Rich Chondrite in Baisha, Hainan. Geology in China, (4): 21–24, 33 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Xiao, Z. Y., Chen, Z. X., Pu, J., et al., 2018. Hailar Crater—A Possible Impact Structure in Inner Mongolia, China. Geomorphology, 306: 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiao, Z. Y., Zeng, Z. X., Li, Z. Y., et al., 2014. Cooling Fractures in Impact Melt Deposits on the Moon and Mercury: Implications for Cooling Solely by Thermal Radiation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(7): 1496–1515. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013je004560 Google Scholar
  18. Xu, X. M., Kenkmann, T., Xiao, Z. Y., et al., 2017. Reconnaissance Survey of the Duolun Ring Structure in Inner Mongolia: Not an Impact Structure. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 52(9): 1822–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yichang Institute of Geology and Mineral, Ministry of Geology and Mineral, Hainan Bureau of Geological and Mineral, 1991a. Hainan Island Geology (III) Tectonic Geology. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. 140 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Yichang Institute of Geology and Mineral, Ministry of Geology and Mineral, Hainan Bureau of Geological and Mineral, 1991b. Cretaceous. In: Zhang, Z. L., Meng, F. S., Sheng, X. C., eds., Hainan Island Geology (I) Stratigraphy and Palaeontology. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. 202–204 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Yin, J. J., Wang, Y. H., 2017a. The Mystery of the Footprints of “The Extraterrestrial” (I). Land & Resources, 11: 60–61 (in Chinese with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  22. Yin, J. J., Wang, Y. H., 2017b. The Mystery of the Footprints of “The Extraterrestrial” (II). Land & Resources, 11: 58–59 (in Chinese with English Abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Planetary Science Institute, School of Earth SciencesChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Space Science InstituteMacau University of Science and TechnologyMacauChina
  3. 3.College of Hydraulic and Ecological EngineeringNanchang Institute of TechnologyNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations